Uchiyama Kimio, Yamada Manabu, Shiiba Yuusuke, Kasazaki Shingo, Suga Kenichirou, Iwabuchi Hiroshi, Asoda Seiji, Uehara Keita
Dept. of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2017 Jul;44(7):585-589.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of aprepitant(from days 1 to 3, po)and fosaprepitant(day 1, iv) for nausea in patients with oral cancer receiving combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, or cisplatin(divided doses for 5 days), and 5-fluorouracil(TPF).The incidence rate of nausea in the aprepitant group was 60%(6/10), and that in the fosaprepitant group was 90%(9/10).The incidence rate of continuous nausea for more than 2 days was significantly lower in the aprepitant group than in the fosaprepitant group(40%[4/10]vs 90%[9/10], p=0.02; c 2 test).In addition, the mean area under the curve of the chronological changes in the grade of nausea tended to be lower in the aprepitant group than in the fosaprepitant group.In both groups, 3 cases(30%)of vomiting were observed.However, the incidence of continued daily vomiting tended to be lower in the aprepitant group than in the fosaprepitant group.These results suggest that aprepitant is more effective than fosaprepitant for nausea induced by TPF.
本研究的目的是确定阿瑞匹坦(第1至3天,口服)和福沙匹坦(第1天,静脉注射)对接受多西他赛、奈达铂或顺铂(分5天给药)与5-氟尿嘧啶(TPF)联合化疗的口腔癌患者恶心症状的影响。阿瑞匹坦组的恶心发生率为60%(6/10),福沙匹坦组为90%(9/10)。阿瑞匹坦组持续恶心超过2天的发生率显著低于福沙匹坦组(40%[4/10]对90%[9/10],p = 0.02;卡方检验)。此外,阿瑞匹坦组恶心程度随时间变化的曲线下平均面积倾向于低于福沙匹坦组。两组均观察到3例(30%)呕吐。然而,阿瑞匹坦组每日持续呕吐的发生率倾向于低于福沙匹坦组。这些结果表明,阿瑞匹坦在治疗TPF引起的恶心方面比福沙匹坦更有效。