• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查前的计算机辅助指导与护士咨询效果相同,一项临床试点试验。

Computer-assisted instruction before colonoscopy is as effective as nurse counselling, a clinical pilot trial.

作者信息

Veldhuijzen Govert, Klemt-Kropp Michael, Noomen Casper, Van Esch Aura A, Tjwa Eric T, Drenth Joost

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2017 Aug;5(8):E792-E797. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110813. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-110813
PMID:28791330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5546893/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Better patient education prior to colonoscopy improves adherence to instructions for bowel preparation and leads to cleaner colons. We reasoned that computer assisted instruction (CAI) using video and 3 D animations followed by nurse contact maximizes the effectiveness of nurse counselling, increases proportion of clean colons and improves patient experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults referred for colonoscopy in a high-volume endoscopy unit in the Netherlands were included. Exclusion criteria were illiteracy in Dutch and audiovisual handicaps. Patients were prospectively divided into 2 groups, 1 group received nurse counselling and 1 group received CAI and a nurse contact before colonoscopy. The main outcome, cleanliness of the colon during examination, was measured with Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS) and Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). We assessed patient comfort and anxiety at 3 different time points.

RESULTS

We included 385 patients: 197 received traditional nurse counselling and 188 received CAI. Overall patient response rates were 99 %, 76.4 % and 69.9 % respectively. Endoscopists scored cleanliness in 60.8 %. Comparative analysis of the 39.2 % of patients with missing scores showed no significant difference on age, gender or educational level. Baseline characteristics were evenly distributed over the groups. Bowel cleanliness was satisfactory and did not differ amongst groups: nurse vs. CAI group scores in BBPS: (6.54 ± 1.69 vs. 6.42 ± 1.62); OBPS: (6.07 ± 2.53 vs. 5.80 ± 2.90). Patient comfort scores were significantly higher (4.29 ± 0.62 vs. 4.42 ± 0.68) in the CAI group shortly before colonoscopy. Anxiety and knowledge scores were similar.

CONCLUSION

CAI is a safe and practical tool to instruct patients before colonoscopy. We recommend the combination of CAI with a short nurse contact for daily practice.

摘要

背景与研究目的

结肠镜检查前更好地对患者进行教育可提高患者对肠道准备说明的依从性,并使结肠更清洁。我们推断,使用视频和3D动画的计算机辅助教学(CAI),随后由护士进行跟进,可使护士咨询的效果最大化,提高清洁结肠的比例,并改善患者体验。

患者与方法

纳入荷兰一家大容量内镜检查单位中被转诊进行结肠镜检查的成年人。排除标准为荷兰语文盲和视听障碍。患者被前瞻性地分为两组,一组接受护士咨询,另一组在结肠镜检查前接受CAI及护士跟进。主要结局指标,即检查时结肠的清洁度,采用渥太华肠道准备量表(OBPS)和波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)进行测量。我们在3个不同时间点评估了患者的舒适度和焦虑程度。

结果

我们纳入了385例患者:197例接受传统护士咨询,188例接受CAI。总体患者回复率分别为99%、76.4%和69.9%。内镜医师对60.8%的患者的清洁度进行了评分。对39.2%评分缺失患者的比较分析显示,在年龄、性别或教育水平方面无显著差异。基线特征在各组中分布均匀。肠道清洁度令人满意,且各组之间无差异:护士咨询组与CAI组的BBPS评分分别为(6.54±1.69对6.42±1.62);OBPS评分分别为(6.07±2.53对5.80±2.90)。在结肠镜检查前不久,CAI组的患者舒适度评分显著更高(4.29±0.62对4.42±0.68)。焦虑和知识评分相似。

结论

CAI是结肠镜检查前指导患者的一种安全实用的工具。我们建议在日常实践中将CAI与简短的护士跟进相结合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81d4/5546893/6a9136487f82/10-1055-s-0043-110813-i741ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81d4/5546893/4ea234ce1853/10-1055-s-0043-110813-i741ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81d4/5546893/6a9136487f82/10-1055-s-0043-110813-i741ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81d4/5546893/4ea234ce1853/10-1055-s-0043-110813-i741ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81d4/5546893/6a9136487f82/10-1055-s-0043-110813-i741ei2.jpg

相似文献

1
Computer-assisted instruction before colonoscopy is as effective as nurse counselling, a clinical pilot trial.结肠镜检查前的计算机辅助指导与护士咨询效果相同,一项临床试点试验。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Aug;5(8):E792-E797. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110813. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
2
Computer-based patient education is non-inferior to nurse counselling prior to colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.基于计算机的患者教育在结肠镜检查前与护士咨询相比不劣效:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):254-263. doi: 10.1055/a-1225-8708. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy.电子患者咨询试验(E-PACO):基于计算机的教育与护士咨询对患者结肠镜检查准备的比较
J Vis Exp. 2019 Aug 1(150). doi: 10.3791/58798.
4
Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.患者教育结合卡通视觉辅助对结肠镜检查肠道准备质量的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):804-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
5
Providing Hospitalized Patients With an Educational Booklet Increases the Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation.为住院患者提供教育手册可提高结肠镜肠道准备质量。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jun;14(6):858-864. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men.男性筛查或监测结肠镜检查中充分肠道准备的量化评估
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):396-405; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade is an effective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation in low-risk patients: a randomized controlled study.Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade 是一种有效、安全且耐受良好的低危患者肠道准备选择:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1036-42. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.115. Epub 2012 May 8.
8
Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.波士顿肠道准备量表的综合验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.068.
9
Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II).强化短信服务的患者教育以提高结肠镜检查准备质量和接受度:一项随机、多中心研究(PERICLES-II)的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):506-513.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
10
[Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: comparative study using Boston Bowel Preparation Scale].[结肠镜检查的肠道准备:使用波士顿肠道准备量表的比较研究]
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2012 Sep;42(3):186-92.

引用本文的文献

1
A digital intake tool to avert outpatient visits in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening population: study protocol of a multicentre, prospective non-randomized trial - the DIT-trial.基于 FIT 的结直肠癌筛查人群中避免门诊就诊的数字化入组工具:一项多中心、前瞻性非随机试验的研究方案 - DIT 试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 18;24(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03039-0.
2
Impact of Multimedia CD Education on the Quality of Colon Preparation; A Single-Blind Randomized Study.多媒体光盘教育对结肠准备质量的影响;一项单盲随机研究。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2022 Oct;14(4):431-436. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.304. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Advantages and Challenges of Measuring Patient Experience in Outpatient Clinical Practice. Part 2: History of Patient Satisfaction in Health Care.门诊临床实践中衡量患者体验的优势与挑战。第2部分:医疗保健中患者满意度的历史
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 May;111(5):587-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.78. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
2
An Unexpected Turn: My Life as a Cancer Advocate.意外转折:我作为癌症倡导者的生活
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 May;111(5):594-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.118. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
3
Improved Bowel Preparation with Multimedia Education in a Predominantly African-American Population: A Randomized Study.
Cloud-based multi-media systems for patient education and adherence: a pilot study to explore patient compliance with colonoscopy procedure preparation.
用于患者教育与依从性的基于云的多媒体系统:一项探索患者对结肠镜检查程序准备依从性的试点研究。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2019 Sep 12;10(2):89-103. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2019.1663974.
4
Impact of Video Aid on Quality of Bowel Preparation Among Patients Undergoing Outpatient Screening Colonoscopy.视频辅助对接受门诊结肠镜筛查患者肠道准备质量的影响
Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 8;11:1179552218803304. doi: 10.1177/1179552218803304. eCollection 2018.
在以非裔美国人为主的人群中通过多媒体教育改善肠道准备:一项随机研究。
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2016;2016:2072401. doi: 10.1155/2016/2072401. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
Meta-analysis: The effect of patient education on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.荟萃分析:患者教育对结肠镜检查肠道准备的影响
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Dec;3(6):E646-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392365. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
5
What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.何种程度的肠道准备质量需要早期重复结肠镜检查:准备质量对腺瘤检出率影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.232. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
6
Optimal bowel preparation--a practical guide for clinicians.最佳肠道准备--临床医生实用指南。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;11(7):419-25. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.35. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
7
Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video.使用教育视频提高结肠镜检查肠道准备质量。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;27(12):696-700. doi: 10.1155/2013/292636.
8
Failure of an Internet-based health care intervention for colonoscopy preparation: a caveat for investigators.基于互联网的结肠镜检查准备医疗干预措施的失败:给研究者的一个警示
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 22;173(14):1374-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6477.
9
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明:定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
10
Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).结肠镜筛查质量:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)立场声明
Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):957-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325686. Epub 2012 Sep 17.