a Department of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
b Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
J Med Econ. 2017 Dec;20(12):1252-1260. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1365720. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
To assess the impact of Medicaid prescription copayment policies on anti-psychotic and other medication use among patients with schizophrenia.
The study sample included fee-for-service adult Medicaid patients with schizophrenia. Medicaid claims records from 2003-2005 from 42 states and D.C. were linked with county-level data from the Area Resource File and findings from a state Medicaid policy survey. Patient-level fixed-effects regression models examined the impact of increases in generic copayments and generic/brand copayment differentials on monthly use of anti-psychotic (overall and by generic/brand status) and other non-antipsychotic medications. Medications for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes in sub-groups of patients with these comorbidities were also examined.
Prescription copayment changes had a statistically significant but small impact on anti-psychotic use. For instance, for every $1 increase in the minimum or generic copayment per prescription, there was a reduction of 1.4 anti-psychotic drug fills per 100 patient months (relative reduction = 1.9%). The generic/brand copayment differential increases also had a minimal impact in changing utilization of first-generation (generic) and second-generation (brand) anti-psychotics. Effects of copayment changes on non-anti-psychotic medication use were substantially higher; for each $1 generic copayment increase, there was a reduction of 23 non-anti-psychotic drug fills per 100 patient months (relative reduction = 10.1%). Similarly, for each $1 increase in the generic/brand copayment differential, there was a reduction of 15 non-anti-psychotic drug fills (relative reduction = 5.6%). Reductions in the number of prescriptions filled for antidiabetics, antihypertensives, and lipid-lowering agents were 4-11-fold higher than corresponding reductions for anti-psychotics.
Because federal law requires pharmacists to fill medications for Medicaid patients regardless of the ability to pay, these results may under-estimate the true impact of copayment increases.
Medicaid prescription copayment increases resulted in only a minimal decline in anti-psychotic medication use, but much larger reductions in use of other medications, particularly cardiometabolic medications.
评估医疗补助处方药共付政策对精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物和其他药物使用的影响。
研究样本包括按服务收费的成年医疗补助精神分裂症患者。从 2003 年至 2005 年,来自 42 个州和哥伦比亚特区的医疗补助索赔记录与来自区域资源文件的县级数据和一项州医疗补助政策调查结果相链接。患者层面固定效应回归模型考察了增加通用共付额和通用/品牌共付额差异对每月抗精神病药物(整体和按通用/品牌状况)和其他非抗精神病药物使用的影响。还检查了患有这些合并症的患者亚组中高血压、高血脂和糖尿病药物的使用情况。
处方共付额的变化对抗精神病药物的使用有统计学意义但影响较小。例如,每增加处方药最低或通用共付额 1 美元,每 100 个患者月就会减少 1.4 种抗精神病药物的配药(相对减少 1.9%)。通用/品牌共付额差异的增加也对第一代(通用)和第二代(品牌)抗精神病药物的使用变化影响很小。共付额变化对非抗精神病药物使用的影响要高得多;每增加 1 美元通用共付额,每 100 个患者月就会减少 23 种非抗精神病药物的配药(相对减少 10.1%)。同样,每增加 1 美元通用/品牌共付额差异,就会减少 15 种非抗精神病药物的配药(相对减少 5.6%)。减少抗糖尿病药物、抗高血压药物和降血脂药物的处方数量是抗精神病药物相应减少数量的 4-11 倍。
由于联邦法律要求药剂师为医疗补助患者配药,无论其支付能力如何,因此这些结果可能低估了共付额增加的真正影响。
医疗补助处方药共付额的增加仅导致抗精神病药物使用略有下降,但其他药物(特别是心血管代谢药物)的使用大幅下降。