Charlie Gard and the limits of medicine.
出版信息
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):531. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32159-1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Charlie Gard and the limits of medicine.
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):531. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32159-1.
2
Observations on the case of Charlie Gard.关于查理·加德一案的观察
Arch Dis Child. 2018 May;103(5):409-410. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314373. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
3
Is it in Charlie Gard's best interest to die?让查理·加德死去符合他的最大利益吗？
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1868-1869. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31204-7. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Hard lessons: learning from the Charlie Gard case.沉痛教训：从查理·加德案中吸取教训。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jul;44(7):438-442. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104492. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
5
Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie Gard case.寻求非已确立医疗方法的父母：查理·盖德案的反思。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jul;44(7):443-447. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104902. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
When Doctors and Parents Don't Agree: The story of Charlie Gard.当医生与家长意见相左时：查理·加德的故事。
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Dec;14(4):461-468. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9814-9. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Law, ethics, and emotion: the Charlie Gard case.法律、伦理与情感：查理·加德案
BMJ. 2017 Jul 4;358:j3152. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3152.
8
The United Kingdom Sets Limits on Experimental Treatments: The Case of Charlie Gard.英国对实验性治疗设限：查理·加德事件
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1001-1002. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.10410.
9
Charlie Gard and the weight of parental rights to seek experimental treatment.查理·加德和父母寻求实验性治疗的权利的重量。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jul;44(7):448-452. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104718. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Reflections on Charlie Gard and the Best Interests Standard From Both Sides of the Atlantic Ocean.大西洋两岸对查理·加德案和最佳利益标准的反思。
Pediatrics. 2020 Aug;146(Suppl 1):S60-S65. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0818L.
Zotero 插件