Plociennik Lukasz, Nelson Scott M, Lukaszuk Aron, Kunicki Michal, Podfigurna Agnieszka, Meczekalski Blazej, Lukaszuk Krzysztof
a INVICTA Fertility and Reproductive Center , Gdansk , Poland.
b School of Medicine , University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;34(2):115-119. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1358708. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
The aim of the study was to determine whether the assays exhibit an interaction with age and exhibit heterogeneous age related declines in AMH. Apart of chronological age, AMH variation was investigated with relation to menstrual cycle day (MCD). The goal implicates two questions: Are distributions of AMH concentrations homogenous after adjustment for the specific AMH assay? Does age-assay product has an effect on AMH depletion?
The study was conducted by examining results of AMH tests performed for 12,917 women with four types of AMH assays: Immunotech I generation kit (IMI, 4016 samples), Beckman Coulter II generation kit RUO (BCII RUO, 3430 samples), Beckman Coulter II generation kit with IVD certificate (BCII IVD, 830 samples), and Ansh Labs I generation kit (AnshLabs, 4641 samples). Statistical analysis included ACNOVA and least square regression technique.
Menstrual cycle day has no effect on AMH measurements. On the other hand, AMH values differed substantially between the four assays, with a marked discordance in the rate of age-related AMH decline for the four assays (ranging from -8.16% (95% CI: -8.79, -7.54) to -11.53% (95% CI -12.20, -10.87), with a significant interaction between age and assay.
(1) The distribution of AMH concentration is heterogeneous after controlling the age across assays; (2) the rate of AMH decline as a function of age is different for the four manual AMH ELISA assays.
本研究旨在确定这些检测方法是否与年龄存在相互作用,以及抗苗勒管激素(AMH)是否存在与年龄相关的异质性下降。除了实足年龄外,还研究了AMH变化与月经周期日(MCD)的关系。该目标涉及两个问题:在针对特定的AMH检测方法进行校正后,AMH浓度分布是否均匀?年龄-检测方法的乘积是否对抗苗勒管激素的消耗有影响?
通过检查对12917名女性进行的AMH检测结果开展本研究,这些检测采用了四种类型的AMH检测方法:免疫技术第一代试剂盒(IMI,4016份样本)、贝克曼库尔特第二代RUO试剂盒(BCII RUO,3430份样本)、具有体外诊断证书的贝克曼库尔特第二代试剂盒(BCII IVD,830份样本)以及安仕实验室第一代试剂盒(安仕实验室,4641份样本)。统计分析包括方差分析和最小二乘回归技术。
月经周期日对AMH测量没有影响。另一方面,四种检测方法之间的AMH值存在显著差异,四种检测方法中与年龄相关的AMH下降速率存在明显不一致(范围从-8.16%(95%置信区间:-8.79,-7.54)到-11.53%(95%置信区间-12.20,-10.87),年龄与检测方法之间存在显著相互作用。
(1)在跨检测方法控制年龄后,AMH浓度分布是异质性的;(2)四种手动AMH酶联免疫吸附测定法中,AMH随年龄下降的速率不同。