University Institute for the History of Medicine and Public Health (IUHMSP), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Emergency Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):669-676. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13992. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
To investigate the assessment of pain intensity in the specific context of triage.
Acute pain affects most patients admitted to emergency departments, but pain relief in this setting remains insufficient. Evaluation of pain and its treatment at the time of patient triage expedites the administration of analgesia, but may be awkward at this time-pressured moment. The assessment of pain intensity by a validated pain scale is a critical initial step, and a patient's self-reporting is widely considered as the key to effective pain management. According to good practice guidelines, clinicians must accept a patient's statement, regardless of their own opinions.
A qualitative methodology rooted in interactionist sociology and on the Grounded theory was used to provide an opportunity to uncover complex decision-making processes, such as those involved in assessing pain.
A sociologist conducted semi-structured interviews during the 2013-2014 winter months with twelve nurses and trained in the use of an established protocol, focusing on the assessment of pain intensity. The interviews were recorded, fully transcribed and analysed.
The most frequently used pain scale was the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale. Discrepancies between self-assessment and evaluation by a nurse were common. To restore congruence between the two, nurses used various tactics, such as using different definitions of the high-end anchor of the scale, providing additional explanations about the scale, or using abnormal vital signs or the acceptance of morphine as a proof of the validity of severe pain ratings.
Nurses cannot easily suspend their own judgement. Their tactics do not express a lack of professionalism, but are consistent with the logic of professional intervention.
This article presents triage nurses' reality in a time-pressured environment, and understanding this conflict may outline new educational targets to further improve pain management in ED.
调查分诊特定背景下的疼痛强度评估。
急性疼痛影响大多数入住急诊科的患者,但在这种情况下,疼痛缓解仍然不足。在患者分诊时评估疼痛及其治疗可以加快镇痛剂的给药,但在这个时间紧迫的时刻可能会有些尴尬。使用经过验证的疼痛量表评估疼痛强度是一个关键的初始步骤,而患者的自我报告被广泛认为是有效疼痛管理的关键。根据良好实践指南,临床医生必须接受患者的陈述,无论他们自己的意见如何。
扎根于交互主义社会学和扎根理论的定性方法学为提供机会以揭示复杂的决策过程提供了机会,例如评估疼痛所涉及的过程。
一位社会学家在 2013-2014 年冬季期间,使用既定协议对 12 名护士进行了半结构化访谈,重点是评估疼痛强度。采访进行了录音、完整的转录和分析。
最常使用的疼痛量表是数字评分量表。自我评估与护士评估之间的差异很常见。为了在两者之间恢复一致性,护士使用了各种策略,例如使用量表高端锚的不同定义、提供有关量表的额外解释,或者使用异常生命体征或接受吗啡作为严重疼痛评分有效性的证明。
护士不能轻易地暂停自己的判断。他们的策略并不是缺乏专业精神,而是与专业干预的逻辑一致。
本文介绍了分诊护士在时间紧迫的环境下的现实情况,了解这种冲突可能会确定新的教育目标,以进一步改善急诊科的疼痛管理。