Schvartz-Leyzac Kara C, Zwolan Teresa A, Pfingst Bryan E
a Department of Otolaryngology , Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , USA.
b Department of Otolaryngology , Hearing Rehabilitation Center, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , USA.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Nov;18(6):324-334. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1359457. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
The objective of the current study is to evaluate how speech recognition performance is affected by the number of active electrodes that are turned off in multichannel cochlear implants. Several recent studies have demonstrated positive effects of deactivating stimulation sites based on an objective measure in cochlear implant processing strategies. Previous studies using an analysis of variance have shown that, on average, cochlear implant listeners' performance does not improve beyond eight active electrodes. We hypothesized that using a generalized linear mixed model would allow for better examination of this question.
Seven peri- and post-lingual adult cochlear implant users (eight ears) were tested on speech recognition tasks using experimental MAPs which contained either 8, 12, 16 or 20 active electrodes. Speech recognition tests included CUNY sentences in speech-shaped noise, TIMIT sentences in quiet as well as vowel (CVC) and consonant (CV) stimuli presented in quiet and in signal-to-noise ratios of 0 and +10 dB.
The speech recognition threshold in noise (dB SNR) significantly worsened by approximately 2 dB on average as the number of active electrodes was decreased from 20 to 8. Likewise, sentence recognition scores in quiet significantly decreased by an average of approximately 12%.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Cochlear implant recipients can utilize and benefit from using more than eight spectral channels when listening to complex sentences or sentences in background noise. The results of the current study suggest a conservative approach for turning off stimulation sites is best when using site-selection procedures.
本研究的目的是评估在多通道人工耳蜗中,关闭的有源电极数量如何影响语音识别性能。最近的几项研究表明,在人工耳蜗处理策略中,基于客观测量停用刺激部位具有积极效果。先前使用方差分析的研究表明,平均而言,人工耳蜗使用者在超过八个有源电极时,其性能不会进一步提高。我们假设使用广义线性混合模型将能更好地研究这个问题。
七名成年人工耳蜗使用者(八只耳朵),包括语前和语后使用者,使用包含8、12、16或20个有源电极的实验性映射程序进行语音识别任务测试。语音识别测试包括语音形状噪声中的纽约城市大学句子、安静环境中的蒂米特句子,以及安静环境中以及信噪比为0和 +10 dB时呈现的元音(CVC)和辅音(CV)刺激。
随着有源电极数量从20个减少到8个,噪声中的语音识别阈值(dB SNR)平均显著恶化约2 dB。同样,安静环境中的句子识别分数平均显著下降约12%。
讨论/结论:人工耳蜗接受者在听复杂句子或背景噪声中的句子时,可以利用超过八个频谱通道并从中受益。本研究结果表明,在使用部位选择程序时,关闭刺激部位的保守方法是最佳的。