Nainani Viveka, Galal Ushma, Buttery Jim, Snape Matthew D
Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Department of Infection and Immunity, Monash Children's Hospital, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Sep 20;102(10):958-962. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312941.
To determine whether the introduction of the capsular group B meningococcal vaccine (4CMenB) in the UK has increased presentations of infants to emergency departments with adverse events following immunisation (AEFI).
PARTICIPANTS, DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of hospital records of infants aged 1-6 months presenting to Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust's emergency departments from September 2013 to August 2016 with discharge diagnoses of vaccine reactions or non-specific conditions. Immunisation history was checked by reference to centralised immunisation records.
Presentation classifications were 'probable vaccine reaction' (ie, symptoms within 48 hours of immunisation; no alternative cause found), 'possible vaccine reaction' (symptoms within 48 hours of immunisation with a possible alternative cause) or 'not related' (clear alternative diagnosis or not immunised within previous 48 hours).
Prior to 4CMenB introduction (2013-15), an annual average of 12 infants presented with probable or possible AEFIs, increasing to 38 infants in the year following 4CMenB introduction (2015/2016). Rates of AEFIs per 1000 immunisation episodes increased post-4CMenB introduction from 1.03 to 3.4 (p<0.001) at 2 months and from 0.14 to 1.13 (p=0.005) at 4 months. At 3 months, when 4CMenB is not given, no increase was seen (p=0.380). 4CMenB introduction was also associated with increased AEFI-related hospital admissions, invasive investigations and intravenous antibiotic use.
The increase in emergency department attendances, investigations and antibiotic use for AEFIs following 4CMenB immunisation may influence the cost-effectiveness of the 4CMenB immunisation campaign.
确定在英国引入B群脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(4CMenB)后,是否会导致更多婴儿因免疫接种后出现不良事件(AEFI)而前往急诊科就诊。
参与者、设计与地点:对2013年9月至2016年8月期间前往牛津大学医院国民保健服务信托基金急诊科就诊的1至6个月婴儿的医院记录进行回顾性审查,出院诊断为疫苗反应或非特异性病症。通过查阅集中免疫记录检查免疫接种史。
就诊分类为“可能的疫苗反应”(即免疫接种后48小时内出现症状;未发现其他病因)、“可能的疫苗反应”(免疫接种后48小时内出现症状且可能存在其他病因)或“无关”(明确的其他诊断或在之前48小时内未接种疫苗)。
在引入4CMenB之前(2013 - 2015年),平均每年有12名婴儿出现可能或可能的AEFI,在引入4CMenB后的一年(2015/2016年)增加到38名婴儿。4CMenB引入后,每1000次免疫接种的AEFI发生率在2个月时从1.03增加到3.4(p<0.001),在4个月时从0.14增加到1.13(p = 0.005)。在3个月时,未接种4CMenB,未观察到增加(p = 0.380)。引入4CMenB还与AEFI相关的住院、侵入性检查和静脉使用抗生素增加有关。
4CMenB免疫接种后急诊科就诊、检查和抗生素使用的增加可能会影响4CMenB免疫接种活动的成本效益。