• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床研究中的伦理演变与伦理委员会

Evolution of Ethics in Clinical Research and Ethics Committee.

作者信息

Das Nilay Kanti, Sil Amrita

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, West Bengal, India.

Member of Institutional Ethics Committee of Human Research, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dermatol. 2017 Jul-Aug;62(4):373-379. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_271_17.

DOI:10.4103/ijd.IJD_271_17
PMID:28794547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5527717/
Abstract

Ethics are the moral values of human behavior and the principles which govern these values. The situation becomes challenging for a doctor when he assumes the role of researcher. The doctor-researcher has to serve both the roles and at times the zeal of an investigator has the potential to cloud the morality of the physician inside. It is very important to realize that exploiting the faith of patients is an offence that tantamount to a crime. Medical science is one discipline where the advancement of knowledge is hugely guided by research and mankind has benefitted from many experiments. However benefit and risk are the two faces of the same coin. Various unethical human experiments made us realize that the whims of researchers need to be reined and led to the evolution of the first guidelines for researcher, the Nuremberg code. Thereafter the Good Clinical Practice guidelines serve as the guiding doctrine of clinical research. The principles of ethics rest on the four pillars of autonomy, beneficence, justice, non-maleficence and recently two more pillars are added which includes, confidentiality and honesty. Ethics committees serve as a guardian of these principles. The multidisciplinary Ethics Committee ensures a competent review of the ethical aspects of the project proposal submitted and does it free from any bias or external influence. Ethical review of clinical trial applications follows a decentralized process in India, and requires Ethics Committee approval for each trial site. All Ethics committees have to be registered with Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) without which they cannot approve any clinical trial protocol and has come into effect from 25th February 2013.

摘要

伦理道德是人类行为的道德价值观以及支配这些价值观的原则。当医生承担起研究者的角色时,情况就变得具有挑战性了。医生-研究者必须兼顾这两个角色,有时研究者的热情有可能会蒙蔽其内心作为医生的道德准则。必须认识到,利用患者的信任是一种等同于犯罪的违法行为。医学是一门知识进步在很大程度上由研究引导的学科,人类从许多实验中受益。然而,益处和风险是同一枚硬币的两面。各种不道德的人体实验让我们意识到研究者的突发奇想需要受到约束,这也促成了第一部针对研究者的准则——《纽伦堡法典》的诞生。此后,《药物临床试验质量管理规范》准则成为了临床研究的指导原则。伦理道德原则基于自主、有益、公正、不伤害这四大支柱,最近又增加了另外两大支柱,即保密和诚实。伦理委员会是这些原则的守护者。多学科伦理委员会确保对提交的项目提案的伦理方面进行全面审查,并且审查过程不受任何偏见或外部影响。在印度,对临床试验申请的伦理审查遵循分散式流程,每个试验地点都需要伦理委员会的批准。所有伦理委员会都必须在印度药品总监(DCGI)处注册,否则它们无法批准任何临床试验方案,该规定自2013年2月25日起生效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96c/5527717/3a4d484e2625/IJD-62-373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96c/5527717/3a4d484e2625/IJD-62-373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f96c/5527717/3a4d484e2625/IJD-62-373-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of Ethics in Clinical Research and Ethics Committee.临床研究中的伦理演变与伦理委员会
Indian J Dermatol. 2017 Jul-Aug;62(4):373-379. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_271_17.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
4
Ethics in clinical research: the Indian perspective.临床研究中的伦理:印度视角
Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011 Mar;73(2):125-30. doi: 10.4103/0250-474x.91564.
5
Preliminary ethical appraisal of a trial - what's it all about?一项试验的初步伦理评估——这一切是关于什么的?
Duodecim. 2017;133(6):582-6.
6
[The Nazis, guide of the International Conference of Harmonization and ethics committees].[纳粹,国际协调会议及伦理委员会的引导者] (此内容与事实严重不符,纳粹在历史上犯下了不可饶恕的罪行,不应该被美化或给予不当描述)
Gac Med Mex. 2003 Jul-Aug;139(4):415-22.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
Medical ethics and ethical dilemmas.医学伦理与伦理困境。
Niger J Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):8-16.
9
Research ethics application: a guide for the novice researcher.研究伦理申请:新手研究者指南
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(1):38-40, 42-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.1.38.
10
[Research ethics committees: a necessary good].[研究伦理委员会:一项必要的善举]
Invest Clin. 2013 Dec;54(4):343-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical principles across countries: does 'ethical' mean the same everywhere?各国的伦理原则:“伦理”在各地的含义相同吗?
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1579778. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1579778. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceptions of Cardiovascular Healthcare Professionals Regarding Clinical Trials: A Survey-Based Study from the Middle East.中东地区心血管疾病医疗专业人员对临床试验的认知:一项基于调查的研究
Glob Heart. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):4. doi: 10.5334/gh.1389. eCollection 2025.
3
Emphasizing Patient-Centricity Through a Tailored Training Program to Empower Patients, Advocates, and Ethics Committees in Good Clinical Practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Indian clinical trials: Paradigm shift from speed to quality?印度的临床试验:从速度到质量的范式转变?
Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jan;3(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.92299.
2
Ethics in clinical research: the Indian perspective.临床研究中的伦理:印度视角
Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011 Mar;73(2):125-30. doi: 10.4103/0250-474x.91564.
3
Survey of ethics committee protocol approval letters: compliance with Schedule Y/ICMR guidelines 2006.伦理委员会方案批准函调查:是否符合2006年《Y表/印度医学研究理事会指南》
通过量身定制的培训计划强调以患者为中心,以增强患者、倡导者和伦理委员会在良好临床实践中的能力。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 7;16(7):e64042. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64042. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Post-approval process: A challenge for ethics committees.批准后程序:伦理委员会面临的一项挑战。
Perspect Clin Res. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):139-145. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_214_22. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
5
Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: A Comprehensive Review.临床试验与临床研究:全面综述
Cureus. 2023 Feb 16;15(2):e35077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35077. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Perceptions of Older People with Cognitive Impairment, Caregivers, and Professionals about ehcoBUTLER (Tablet Health Care Platform): A Qualitative Focus Group Study.认知障碍老年人、照顾者和专业人员对 ehcoBUTLER(平板电脑医疗保健平台)的看法:一项定性焦点小组研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;19(11):6761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116761.
7
Informed Consent in Biomedical Research: Scopes and Challenges.生物医学研究中的知情同意:范围与挑战。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021 Jul 14;12(4):529-535. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_83_21. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
8
A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery.外科指导中伦理问题的系统综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019 Dec 19;6:2382120519888915. doi: 10.1177/2382120519888915. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
9
Time to consider ovarian tissue cryopreservation for girls with Turner's syndrome: an opinion paper.是时候考虑为特纳综合征女孩进行卵巢组织冷冻保存了:一篇意见书。
Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Jun 20;2019(3):hoz016. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz016. eCollection 2019.
10
Who should pay for the continuity of post-trial health care treatments?谁应该为试验后医疗的连续性付费?
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0919-0.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2011 Oct-Dec;8(4):214-6. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2011.083.
4
Medical ethics: four principles, two decisions, two roles and no reasons.医学伦理学:四项原则、两种决策、两种角色且无理由。
J Prim Health Care. 2011 Jun 1;3(2):170-4.
5
A systematic review of ethical principles in the plastic surgery literature.系统评价整形外科学文献中的伦理原则。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1711-1718. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98a9f.
6
Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research.临床研究全球化的伦理与科学影响
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):816-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb0803929.
7
The Nuremberg Code.《纽伦堡法典》
JAMA. 1996 Nov 27;276(20):1691.
8
Ethics and clinical research.伦理与临床研究
N Engl J Med. 1966 Jun 16;274(24):1354-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196606162742405.
9
The Willowbrook hepatitis studies revisited: ethical aspects.
Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Jan-Feb;8(1):157-62. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.1.157.