Shahin A A, Zayed H S, Said M, Amer S A
Rheumatology and Rehabilitaion department and Endemic Medicine and Hepatogastroenterology department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Z Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;77(7):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s00393-017-0356-7.
The use of pegylated interferon alpha (IFN) has been of concern in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients with rheumatologic extrahepatic manifestations (EHM) due to the immunostimulatory effects of IFN.
To study the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based, IFN-free antiviral therapy in chronic HCV patients with rheumatologic EHM.
Group A included 24 patients with arthropathy (arthralgia or arthritis, n = 15) or vasculitis (n = 9) who received sofosbuvir and ribavirin (n = 17) or sofosbuvir and simeprevir (n = 7). Group B comprised 15 historical controls suffering from arthropathy who had received IFN and ribavirin. All patients were clinically evaluated and by detection of HCV viremia at baseline (V0), at the end of treatment (V1), 12 weeks after end of treatment (V2) and 24 weeks after end of treatment (V3).
Sustained viral response was obtained in all patients of group A (100%) versus 12 out of 15 of group B (80%). In group A, the tender joint count (TJC) and visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) improved (p = 0.001 for both) while the swollen joint count (SJC) decreased at V1 (p = 0.001) but returned to baseline values at V3. All vasculitis patients improved. Purpura, arthralgia and leg ulcers disappeared, but peripheral neuropathy persisted. In group B, TJC, SJC and VAS increased from baseline values (p = 0.034, 0.03 and 0.001, respectively). Side effects in group A were generally mild, but one patient developed deterioration of arthralgia.
The use of IFN-free regimens is safe and effective in the treatment of most HCV-related rheumatologic EHM.
由于聚乙二醇化干扰素α(IFN)具有免疫刺激作用,在患有风湿性肝外表现(EHM)的慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者中使用IFN一直备受关注。
研究以索磷布韦为基础的、不含IFN的抗病毒疗法在患有风湿性EHM的慢性HCV患者中的疗效和安全性。
A组包括24例患有关节病(关节痛或关节炎,n = 15)或血管炎(n = 9)的患者,他们接受了索磷布韦和利巴韦林(n = 17)或索磷布韦和simeprevir(n = 7)治疗。B组包括15例接受过IFN和利巴韦林治疗的患有关节病的历史对照患者。所有患者均在基线(V0)、治疗结束时(V1)、治疗结束后12周(V2)和治疗结束后24周(V3)进行临床评估并检测HCV病毒血症。
A组所有患者(100%)均获得持续病毒学应答,而B组15例中有12例(80%)获得持续病毒学应答。在A组中,压痛关节计数(TJC)和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)有所改善(两者p均 = 0.001),而肿胀关节计数(SJC)在V1时下降(p = 0.001),但在V3时恢复到基线值。所有血管炎患者均有改善。紫癜、关节痛和腿部溃疡消失,但周围神经病变持续存在。在B组中,TJC、SJC和VAS较基线值升高(分别为p = 0.034、0.03和0.001)。A组的副作用一般较轻,但有1例患者关节痛加重。
不含IFN的治疗方案在治疗大多数HCV相关的风湿性EHM中是安全有效的。