École nationale d'administration publique, Canada.
McGill University, Canada.
Health (London). 2018 Nov;22(6):580-602. doi: 10.1177/1363459317724852. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
Our goal in this investigation was to help shed light on the very difficult process of collaboration between family physicians and specialists working at different levels of healthcare delivery. More precisely, and grounded on Giddens' structuration theory, our investigation aims to understand how medical collaboration emerges and develops around chronic patients. This was a longitudinal interpretive case study, the "case" being a continuum-of-care for patients suffering from diabetes, put in place in an urban health center in the Canadian province of Quebec. The study shows how the application of rules of signification and of legitimation, combined with domination resources, have supported the emergence of new forms of collaborative practices. Our analysis reveals, however, that new collaborative practices at the administrative level do not necessarily entail greater shared decision-making in patient management and the mobilization of knowledge across boundaries. The study also corroborates the mutual recursive influence of practices and structures. Our study's most important contribution concerns the impact of knowledge dynamics, that is, individual and collective learning, on the development of medical collaboration across levels of care.
我们的研究目标是帮助阐明家庭医生和在不同医疗服务层次工作的专家之间合作的艰难过程。更确切地说,基于吉登斯的结构化理论,我们的研究旨在了解医疗合作如何在慢性病患者周围产生和发展。这是一项纵向解释性案例研究,“案例”是在加拿大魁北克省一个城市健康中心为患有糖尿病的患者提供的连续护理。该研究展示了意义和合法化规则的应用,以及支配资源,如何支持新的合作实践形式的出现。然而,我们的分析表明,行政层面上的新合作实践并不一定需要在患者管理和跨越边界的知识调动方面进行更多的共同决策。该研究还证实了实践和结构的相互递归影响。我们研究的最重要贡献涉及知识动态(即个人和集体学习)对医疗合作在不同护理层次上发展的影响。