• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在自己的时间里:挑战丧亲之痛的时间性和线性。

In one's own time: Contesting the temporality and linearity of bereavement.

机构信息

University of New South Wales, Australia.

University of Westminster, UK.

出版信息

Health (London). 2019 Jan;23(1):58-75. doi: 10.1177/1363459317724854. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1177/1363459317724854
PMID:28795597
Abstract

This article explores the experience and meaning of time from the perspective of caregivers who have recently been bereaved following the death of a family member. The study is situated within the broader cultural tendency to understand bereavement within the logic of stages, including the perception of bereavement as a somewhat predictable and certainly time-delimited ascent from a nadir in death to a 'new normal' once loss is accepted. Drawing on qualitative data from interviews with 15 bereaved family caregivers we challenge bereavement as a linear, temporally bound process, examining the multiple ways bereavement is experienced and how it variously resists ideas about the timeliness, desirability and even possibility of 'recovery'. We posit, on the basis of these accounts, that the lived experience of bereavement offers considerable challenges to normative understandings of the social ties between the living and the dead and requires a broader reconceptualization of bereavement as an enduring affective state.

摘要

本文从最近经历过亲人去世的照顾者的角度探讨了时间的体验和意义。该研究立足于更广泛的文化倾向,即按照阶段的逻辑理解丧亲之痛,包括将丧亲之痛视为一种可预测且时间有限的上升过程,从死亡的最低点上升到一旦接受损失,就会达到“新常态”。本研究通过对 15 名丧亲家庭照顾者的访谈获得了定性数据,对丧亲之痛作为一个线性的、受时间限制的过程提出了挑战,考察了丧亲之痛的多种体验方式,以及它如何抵制关于“恢复”的及时性、可取性甚至可能性的观念。在此基础上,我们提出,丧亲之痛的实际体验对生者和死者之间社会联系的规范性理解提出了相当大的挑战,需要更广泛地重新概念化丧亲之痛,将其视为一种持久的情感状态。

相似文献

1
In one's own time: Contesting the temporality and linearity of bereavement.在自己的时间里:挑战丧亲之痛的时间性和线性。
Health (London). 2019 Jan;23(1):58-75. doi: 10.1177/1363459317724854. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
2
Identities in Transition: Women Caregivers in Bereavement.身份转变:处于丧亲之痛中的女性照料者
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2016 Jan-Jun;12(1-2):145-61. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2016.1165162.
3
What makes grief difficult? Perspectives from bereaved family caregivers and healthcare providers of advanced cancer patients.什么让悲伤变得难以承受?晚期癌症患者的丧亲家属和医护人员的观点。
Palliat Support Care. 2010 Sep;8(3):277-89. doi: 10.1017/S1478951510000076.
4
The meaning and experience of bereavement support: A qualitative interview study of bereaved family caregivers.丧亲支持的意义和体验:一项对丧亲家庭照顾者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Aug;16(4):396-405. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000475. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
Deathbed experiences and meaning-making: Perspectives of family caregivers of patients who received cancer palliative care.临终体验与意义建构:癌症姑息治疗患者的家庭照护者的观点。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Jun;22(3):444-450. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523001670.
6
'It's a traumatic illness, traumatic to witness': a qualitative study of the experiences of bereaved family caregivers of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.“这是一种创伤性疾病,目睹它让人痛苦不堪”:一项对患有皮肤 T 细胞淋巴瘤患者丧亲家属照顾者经历的定性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Oct;179(4):882-888. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16447. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
7
The "moment of death".死亡时刻。
Omega (Westport). 2007;55(3):219-36. doi: 10.2190/OM.55.3.d.
8
Factors Predicting Bereaved Caregiver Perception of Quality of Care in the Final Week of Life: Implications for Health Care Providers.预测丧亲照顾者对临终最后一周护理质量认知的因素:对医疗服务提供者的启示
J Palliat Med. 2015 Oct;18(10):849-57. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.29001.hp. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Multiple social contexts in qualitative bereavement research.定性丧亲研究中的多种社会背景。
J Aging Stud. 2012 Dec;26(4):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
10
Conducting research interviews with bereaved family carers: when do we ask?对失去亲人的家庭照顾者进行研究访谈:我们何时提问?
J Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;18(3):241-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0320. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Grief and grief support needs in Canada: A mixed methods protocol.加拿大的悲伤情绪与悲伤支持需求:一项混合方法研究方案。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 May 9;19:26323524251334180. doi: 10.1177/26323524251334180. eCollection 2025.
2
Who decides on time? Mad Time as a disruptor of normative research politics and practices.谁决定时间?作为规范研究政治与实践干扰因素的疯狂时间。
Front Sociol. 2025 Apr 17;10:1559616. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1559616. eCollection 2025.
3
Understanding the needs for support and coping strategies in grief following the loss of a significant other: insights from a cross-sectional survey in Sweden.
了解失去重要他人后悲伤情绪中的支持需求及应对策略:瑞典一项横断面调查的见解
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Sep 8;18:26323524241275699. doi: 10.1177/26323524241275699. eCollection 2024.
4
Diarised Reflections on COVID-19 and Bereavement: Disruptions and Affordances.关于新冠疫情与丧亲之痛的日记反思:干扰与机遇
Illn Crises Loss. 2023 Jan;31(1):151-167. doi: 10.1177/10541373211044069.
5
Recovering the body in grief: Physical absence and embodied presence.在悲痛中恢复身体:身体的缺席和身体的在场。
Health (London). 2022 Jul;26(4):393-410. doi: 10.1177/1363459320931914. Epub 2020 Jun 7.