Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Apr;79(4):2176-2182. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26865. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
The regularly incremented phase encoding-magnetic resonance fingerprinting (RIPE-MRF) method is introduced to limit the sensitivity of preclinical MRF assessments to pulsatile and respiratory motion artifacts.
As compared to previously reported standard Cartesian-MRF methods (SC-MRF), the proposed RIPE-MRF method uses a modified Cartesian trajectory that varies the acquired phase-encoding line within each dynamic MRF dataset. Phantoms and mice were scanned without gating or triggering on a 7T preclinical MRI scanner using the RIPE-MRF and SC-MRF methods. In vitro phantom longitudinal relaxation time (T ) and transverse relaxation time (T ) measurements, as well as in vivo liver assessments of artifact-to-noise ratio (ANR) and MRF-based T and T mean and standard deviation, were compared between the two methods (n = 5).
RIPE-MRF showed significant ANR reductions in regions of pulsatility (P < 0.005) and respiratory motion (P < 0.0005). RIPE-MRF also exhibited improved precision in T and T measurements in comparison to the SC-MRF method (P < 0.05). The RIPE-MRF and SC-MRF methods displayed similar mean T and T estimates (difference in mean values < 10%).
These results show that the RIPE-MRF method can provide effective motion artifact suppression with minimal impact on T and T accuracy for in vivo small animal MRI studies. Magn Reson Med 79:2176-2182, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
引入递增相位编码磁共振指纹识别(RIPE-MRF)方法,以限制临床前 MRF 评估对脉动和呼吸运动伪影的敏感性。
与之前报道的标准笛卡尔-MRF 方法(SC-MRF)相比,所提出的 RIPE-MRF 方法使用了一种改进的笛卡尔轨迹,该轨迹在每个动态 MRF 数据集内改变所采集的相位编码线。在 7T 临床前 MRI 扫描仪上,使用 RIPE-MRF 和 SC-MRF 方法对体模和小鼠进行了扫描,无需门控或触发。在这两种方法之间(n = 5),对体外体模纵向弛豫时间(T1)和横向弛豫时间(T2)测量以及体内肝脏的伪影噪声比(ANR)和 MRF 基于 T1 和 T2 的均值和标准差进行了比较。
RIPE-MRF 在脉动(P < 0.005)和呼吸运动(P < 0.0005)区域显示出显著的 ANR 降低。与 SC-MRF 方法相比,RIPE-MRF 还显示出 T1 和 T2 测量的精度提高(P < 0.05)。RIPE-MRF 和 SC-MRF 方法显示出相似的 T1 和 T2 均值估计值(平均值差异 < 10%)。
这些结果表明,RIPE-MRF 方法可以在不影响 T1 和 T2 准确性的情况下,为体内小动物 MRI 研究提供有效的运动伪影抑制。磁共振医学 79:2176-2182,2018。©2017 年国际磁共振学会。