Nosworthy Matthew G, Franczyk Adam J, Medina Gerardo, Neufeld Jason, Appah Paulyn, Utioh Alphonsus, Frohlich Peter, House James D
Department of Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
Food Development Centre , Portage la Prarie, MB R1N 3J9, Canada.
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Sep 6;65(35):7790-7796. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03597. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
In order to determine the effect of extrusion, baking, and cooking on the protein quality of yellow and green split peas, a rodent bioassay was conducted and compared to an in vitro method of protein quality determination. The Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) of green split peas (71.4%) was higher than that of yellow split peas (67.8%), on average. Similarly, the average Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) of green split peas (69%) was higher than that of yellow split peas (67%). Cooked green pea flour had lower PDCAAS and DIAAS values (69.19% and 67%) than either extruded (73.61%, 70%) or baked (75.22%, 70%). Conversely, cooked yellow split peas had the highest PDCCAS value (69.19%), while extruded yellow split peas had the highest DIAAS value (67%). Interestingly, a strong correlation was found between in vivo and in vitro analysis of protein quality (R = 0.9745). This work highlights the differences between processing methods on pea protein quality and suggests that in vitro measurements of protein digestibility could be used as a surrogate for in vivo analysis.
为了确定挤压、烘焙和烹饪对黄、绿豌豆蛋白质质量的影响,进行了一项啮齿动物生物测定,并与蛋白质质量测定的体外方法进行了比较。平均而言,绿豌豆的蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)(71.4%)高于黄豌豆(67.8%)。同样,绿豌豆的平均可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS)(69%)高于黄豌豆(67%)。煮熟的绿豌豆粉的PDCAAS和DIAAS值(69.19%和67%)低于挤压(73.61%,70%)或烘焙(75.22%,70%)的绿豌豆粉。相反,煮熟的黄豌豆的PDCCAS值最高(69.19%),而挤压的黄豌豆的DIAAS值最高(67%)。有趣的是,在蛋白质质量的体内和体外分析之间发现了很强的相关性(R = 0.9745)。这项工作突出了加工方法对豌豆蛋白质质量的差异,并表明蛋白质消化率的体外测量可以用作体内分析的替代方法。