• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰子宫内膜消融术后的长期随访:癌症风险与后续子宫切除术。

Long-term Follow-up After Endometrial Ablation in Finland: Cancer Risks and Later Hysterectomies.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital, Hyvinkää, the Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, and the University of Helsinki, Helsinki, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, and the University of Turku, Turku, the Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, and the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, and the National Institute for Health and Welfare, Department of Information Services, Helsinki, Finland; and the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;130(3):554-560. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002166.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002166
PMID:28796675
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the risk of endometrial cancer and breast cancer and the hysterectomy rate after endometrial ablation.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, records of all women with endometrial ablation at ages 30-49 years in Finland (1997-2014) were extracted from the Hospital Discharge Register and linked to the Cancer Registry and Finnish Central Population Register. The primary outcome was cancer incidences in the endometrial ablation cohort compared with those in the background population of the same age. Secondarily, the postablation hysterectomy rate was compared with that of a control cohort of similar-aged women extracted from the Finnish Central Population Register. Multivariate regression models with adjustment for age, parity, number of cesarean deliveries, history of sterilization, and the duration of follow-up were evaluated as risk factors for postablation hysterectomy.

RESULTS

In total, 154 cancers (standardized incidence ratio [observed-to-expected ratio] 0.96, 95% CI 0.82-1.13) were diagnosed among 5,484 women treated with endometrial ablation during the follow-up of 39,892 women-years. The standardized incidence ratio for endometrial cancer was 0.56 (95% CI 0.12-1.64) and for breast cancer 0.86 (95% CI 0.67-1.09). A total of 1,086 (19.8%) women had postablation hysterectomy. Risk of hysterectomy was almost fourfold in the endometrial ablation cohort compared with 26,938 women in a control group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.63, 95% CI 3.32-3.96). Factors predisposing to postablation hysterectomy were leiomyomas (adjusted HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.03-3.10), age younger than 35 years (adjusted HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15-1.81), at least two prior cesarean deliveries (adjusted HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.55), and history of sterilization (adjusted HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.32).

CONCLUSION

Endometrial ablation was not associated with an elevated endometrial cancer or breast cancer risk in Finland. Leiomyomas, young age, and history of prior cesarean deliveries or sterilization were associated with an increased risk of postablation hysterectomy.

摘要

目的

研究子宫内膜消融术后子宫内膜癌和乳腺癌的发病风险以及子宫切除术率。

方法

本回顾性队列研究从芬兰的住院患者登记系统中提取了年龄在 30-49 岁之间接受子宫内膜消融术的所有女性的记录,并与癌症登记系统和芬兰中央人口登记系统进行了链接。主要结局是比较子宫内膜消融组与同期年龄相匹配的背景人群的癌症发病率。其次,将消融术后的子宫切除术率与从芬兰中央人口登记系统中提取的年龄相匹配的对照组进行比较。通过多变量回归模型,调整年龄、产次、剖宫产次数、绝育史和随访时间等因素,评估这些因素是否为消融术后子宫切除术的危险因素。

结果

在 39892 名女性年的随访期间,共诊断出 5484 名接受子宫内膜消融术的女性中发生了 154 例癌症(标准化发病比[观察到的与预期的比值]0.96,95%CI0.82-1.13)。子宫内膜癌的标准化发病比为 0.56(95%CI0.12-1.64),乳腺癌为 0.86(95%CI0.67-1.09)。共有 1086 名(19.8%)女性在消融术后行子宫切除术。与对照组中 26938 名女性相比,子宫内膜消融组的子宫切除术风险几乎增加了 4 倍(调整后的危险比[HR]3.63,95%CI3.32-3.96)。导致消融术后子宫切除术的因素包括子宫肌瘤(调整后的 HR1.78,95%CI1.03-3.10)、年龄小于 35 岁(调整后的 HR1.44,95%CI1.15-1.81)、至少两次剖宫产(调整后的 HR1.27,95%CI1.04-1.55)和绝育史(调整后的 HR1.15,95%CI1.01-1.32)。

结论

在芬兰,子宫内膜消融术与子宫内膜癌或乳腺癌的发病风险升高无关。子宫肌瘤、年龄较小、既往剖宫产史或绝育史与消融术后子宫切除术风险增加相关。

相似文献

1
Long-term Follow-up After Endometrial Ablation in Finland: Cancer Risks and Later Hysterectomies.芬兰子宫内膜消融术后的长期随访:癌症风险与后续子宫切除术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;130(3):554-560. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002166.
2
Postablation risk factors for pain and subsequent hysterectomy.消融术后疼痛和随后子宫切除术的风险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;124(5):904-910. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000459.
3
Predicting pelvic pain after endometrial ablation: which preoperative patient characteristics are associated?预测子宫内膜消融术后的盆腔痛:哪些术前患者特征与之相关?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
4
Evaluation of Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation: A 17-year Canadian Experience.射频子宫内膜消融术评估:17 年加拿大经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Nov;30(11):905-911. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Endometrial ablation: postoperative complications.子宫内膜消融术:术后并发症。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;207(4):242-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
6
Intraoperative Predictors of Long-term Outcomes After Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation.射频子宫内膜消融术后长期结局的术中预测因素
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 May-Jun;23(4):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
7
Outcomes following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland.子宫切除术或子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多的结果:苏格兰医院病例统计的回顾性分析。
BJOG. 2011 Sep;118(10):1171-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03011.x. Epub 2011 May 31.
8
Endometrial ablation or resection versus levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity: a systematic review with meta-analysis.子宫内膜消融或切除术与左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗宫腔正常的月经过多妇女:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):302-311. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz051.
9
Probability of hysterectomy after endometrial ablation.子宫内膜切除术后子宫切除的概率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1214-1220. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818c1766.
10
Prognostic factors for the success of endometrial ablation in the treatment of menorrhagia with special reference to previous cesarean section.经阴道子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多的疗效预测因素,尤其是剖宫产史。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Mar;167(1):100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation: From Indications to Instrumentation and Techniques-A Call to Action.宫腔镜子宫内膜切除术:从适应证到器械与技术——行动呼吁
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;13(3):339. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030339.
2
Quality of Life, Anxiety and Depression in Women Treated with Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection or Ablation for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.生活质量、焦虑和抑郁在接受宫腔镜子宫内膜切除术或消融术治疗月经过多的女性中的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 17;58(11):1664. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111664.
3
Long-term incidence of endometrial cancer after endometrial resection and ablation: A population based Swedish gynecologic cancer group (SweGCG) study.
子宫内膜切除和消融术后子宫内膜癌的长期发病率:基于人群的瑞典妇科癌症组(SweGCG)研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Aug;101(8):923-930. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14385. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
Water Vapor Endometrial Ablation for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: 36-Month Follow-Up of a Prospective, Multicenter Pivotal Clinical Trial.水蒸气子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多:一项前瞻性、多中心关键临床试验的36个月随访
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Feb 10;13:169-176. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S279864. eCollection 2021.
5
Long-term outcome of endometrial ablation therapy with Cavaterm Thermal Balloon in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.使用Cavaterm热球囊进行子宫内膜消融治疗异常子宫出血患者的长期结局。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2020 Mar 6;21(1):1-9. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2019.2019.0107. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Endometrial ablation; less is more? Historical cohort study comparing long-term outcomes from two time periods and two treatment modalities for 854 women.子宫内膜消融术;越少越好?对 854 名女性两个时期和两种治疗方式的长期结果进行历史队列研究比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219294. eCollection 2019.
7
Predictors of a Successful Bipolar Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation.双极射频子宫内膜去除术成功的预测因素
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Mar;79(3):286-292. doi: 10.1055/a-0733-5798. Epub 2019 Mar 12.