• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动注射器与手动注射磁共振对比剂的准确性和可重复性:实验室研究结果。

Accuracy and Repeatability of Automated Injector Versus Manual Administration of an MRI Contrast Agent-Results of a Laboratory Study.

出版信息

Invest Radiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000403.

DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000403
PMID:28796722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5728584/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare flow rates over time and the deviations from the target flow rate of a magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent achieved by an automated injector versus manual injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this laboratory study, the magnetic resonance contrast agent gadobutrol was repeatedly injected by an injector and by 10 experienced technologists. Six scenarios with 2 different target flow rates (1 and 5 mL/s), 2 different contrast volumes (10 and 20 mL), and 2 different intravenous (IV) catheters (22 gauge and 20 gauge) were tested. The flow rates over time were recorded. The target variable was the average absolute deviation and average absolute percentage deviation from the target flow rate.

RESULTS

The flow rates over time achieved by an injector were almost identical. Slight deviations from the target flow rate occurred during ramp-up and ramp-down only. Those of manual injection showed high variability over the whole course of the injection. In the 1 mL/s scenarios, the injector deviated from the target flow rate by 0.06 mL/s or less (≤6%) and in the 5 mL/s scenarios by 1.02 mL/s or less (<20%). For the manual injections at the same flow rates, these figures were 0.35 mL/s or less (≤35%) and 3.1 mL/s or less (≤62%).

CONCLUSIONS

Injector administration of a magnetic resonance contrast agent minimally deviated from the target flow rate, whereas manual injection varied widely. Injector administration is more accurate and repeatable.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较自动注射器和手动注射实现磁共振造影剂目标流速的时间内流速和流速偏差。

材料和方法

在这项实验室研究中,反复通过注射器和 10 名有经验的技师对磁共振造影剂钆布醇进行注射。测试了 6 种情况,具有 2 种不同的目标流速(1 和 5 mL/s)、2 种不同的对比剂体积(10 和 20 mL)和 2 种不同的静脉(IV)导管(22 号和 20 号)。记录了随时间变化的流速。目标变量是平均绝对偏差和平均绝对百分比偏差从目标流速。

结果

注射器随时间的流速几乎完全相同。仅在斜坡上升和斜坡下降期间发生对目标流速的轻微偏差。手动注射的偏差在整个注射过程中表现出高度的可变性。在 1 mL/s 情况下,注射器的流速偏差小于 0.06 mL/s(≤6%),在 5 mL/s 情况下,流速偏差小于 1.02 mL/s(<20%)。在相同流速下,手动注射的偏差为 0.35 mL/s 或更小(≤35%)和 3.1 mL/s 或更小(≤62%)。

结论

磁共振造影剂的注射器给药最小程度地偏离目标流速,而手动注射则变化很大。注射器给药更准确且可重复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/03b55b5ac221/rli-53-1-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/b460fa7781d9/rli-53-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/00f755f61c8a/rli-53-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/1e01d4b1d15e/rli-53-1-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/03b55b5ac221/rli-53-1-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/b460fa7781d9/rli-53-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/00f755f61c8a/rli-53-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/1e01d4b1d15e/rli-53-1-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc4/5728584/03b55b5ac221/rli-53-1-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy and Repeatability of Automated Injector Versus Manual Administration of an MRI Contrast Agent-Results of a Laboratory Study.自动注射器与手动注射磁共振对比剂的准确性和可重复性:实验室研究结果。
Invest Radiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000403.
2
The impact of injector-based contrast agent administration in time-resolved MRA.基于注射器的对比剂给药在时间分辨 MRA 中的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):2246-2253. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5178-0. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
3
Piston-Based vs Peristaltic Pump-Based CT Injector Systems.基于活塞式与基于蠕动泵的CT注射系统
Radiol Technol. 2019 Mar;90(4):344-352.
4
Safety assessment of gadoversetamide (OptiMARK) administered by power injector.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Jan;19(1):133-40. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10439.
5
Brain DSC MR Perfusion in Children: A Clinical Feasibility Study Using Different Technical Standards of Contrast Administration.脑 DSC MR 灌注成像在儿童中的临床可行性研究:使用不同对比剂给药技术标准。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Feb;40(2):359-365. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5954. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
Prospective study of access site complications of automated contrast injection with peripheral venous access in MDCT.前瞻性研究外周静脉入路自动对比注射在 MDCT 中的入路部位并发症。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Oct;195(4):825-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3739.
7
A multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blind comparison phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of gadobutrol 1.0 M versus gadopentetate dimeglumine following single injection in patients referred for contrast-enhanced MRI of the body regions or extremities.一项多中心、随机、对照、单盲的III期比较研究,旨在确定单次注射1.0 M钆布醇与钆喷酸葡胺在接受身体部位或四肢对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)检查患者中的疗效和安全性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;41(2):404-13. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24566. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
8
Intraindividual quantitative and qualitative comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobutrol in time-resolved contrast-enhanced 4-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in minipigs.在小型猪的时间分辨对比增强 4 维磁共振血管成像中,钆喷酸葡胺和钆布醇的个体内定量和定性比较。
Invest Radiol. 2014 Jul;49(7):457-64. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000036.
9
Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography.对比增强屏气三维磁共振血管造影术注射速率的差异。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Feb;170(2):345-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456943.
10
The Impact of Injector-Based Contrast Agent Administration on Bolus Shape and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Image Quality.基于注射器的造影剂给药对团注形状和磁共振血管造影图像质量的影响。
Magn Reson Insights. 2017 Apr 20;10:1178623X17705894. doi: 10.1177/1178623X17705894. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailored 3D Lattice Microstructures for Enhanced Functionality in Blood-Gas Exchange.用于增强血气交换功能的定制三维晶格微结构
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Apr 17:e2501162. doi: 10.1002/advs.202501162.
2
Technique, protocols and adverse reactions for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): a systematic review.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)的技术、方案及不良反应:一项系统评价
Insights Imaging. 2019 Aug 2;10(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0756-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Injector-Based Contrast Agent Administration on Bolus Shape and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Image Quality.基于注射器的造影剂给药对团注形状和磁共振血管造影图像质量的影响。
Magn Reson Insights. 2017 Apr 20;10:1178623X17705894. doi: 10.1177/1178623X17705894. eCollection 2017.
2
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging contrast media injectors: technical feature review - what is really needed?计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像造影剂注射器:技术特征综述——真正需要的是什么?
Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Jul 15;9:231-9. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S106338. eCollection 2016.
3
Safety of Gadobutrol: Results From 42 Clinical Phase II to IV Studies and Postmarketing Surveillance After 29 Million Applications.
钆布醇的安全性:42项II期至IV期临床研究结果及2900万次应用后的上市后监测
Invest Radiol. 2016 Sep;51(9):537-43. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000270.
4
Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions.灌注 MRI:五个最常被问到的临床问题。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):W495-510. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9544.
5
Gadobutrol: a review of its use for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in adults and children.钆布醇:用于成人和儿童对比增强磁共振成像的综述。
Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Apr;33(4):303-14. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0066-0.
6
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: first-pass arterial enhancement as a function of gadolinium-chelate concentration, and the saline chaser volume and injection rate.对比增强磁共振血管造影:钆螯合物浓度、生理盐水冲洗量和注射速度对首过动脉增强的影响。
Invest Radiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):121-7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182300603.
7
Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches.CT 静脉对比剂给药和扫描时机:考虑因素和方法。
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):32-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090908.
8
Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation.前列腺癌:3T 多参数磁共振成像检测的价值——与组织病理学相关性。
Radiology. 2010 Apr;255(1):89-99. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090475.
9
High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease.高分辨率心肌灌注心脏磁共振成像检测冠状动脉疾病。
Eur Heart J. 2008 Sep;29(17):2148-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn297. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
10
3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography.三维对比增强磁共振血管造影术
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):13-25. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20767.