Choi Ye Ra, Kim Jung Hoon, Park Sang Joon, Hur Bo Yun, Han Joon Koo
Department of Radiology, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182596. eCollection 2017.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: To evaluate accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) for response evaluation of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) using a personalized 3D-printed tumor model.
Twenty patients with liver metastasis from CRC who underwent baseline and after chemotherapy CT, were retrospectively included. Personalized 3D-printed tumor models using CT were fabricated. Two radiologists measured volume of each 3D printing model using 3D US. With CT as a reference, we compared difference between CT and US tumor volume. The response evaluation was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
3D US tumor volume showed no significant difference from CT volume (7.18 ± 5.44 mL, 8.31 ± 6.32 mL vs 7.42 ± 5.76 mL in CT, p>0.05). 3D US provided a high correlation coefficient with CT (r = 0.953, r = 0.97) as well as a high inter-observer intraclass correlation (0.978; 0.958-0.988). Regarding response, 3D US was in agreement with CT in 17 and 18 out of 20 patients for observer 1 and 2 with excellent agreement (κ = 0.961).
3D US tumor volume using a personalized 3D-printed model is an accurate and reliable method for the response evaluation in comparison with CT tumor volume.
使用个性化三维打印肿瘤模型评估三维超声(3D US)对结直肠癌(CRC)肝转移反应评估的准确性和可靠性。
回顾性纳入20例接受基线及化疗后CT检查的CRC肝转移患者。使用CT制作个性化三维打印肿瘤模型。两名放射科医生使用3D US测量每个三维打印模型的体积。以CT为参照,我们比较了CT与US肿瘤体积之间的差异。反应评估基于实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)标准。
3D US肿瘤体积与CT体积无显著差异(分别为7.18±5.44 mL、8.31±6.32 mL,而CT为7.42±5.76 mL,p>0.05)。3D US与CT具有较高的相关系数(r = 0.953,r = 0.97)以及较高的观察者间组内相关性(0.978;0.958 - 0.988)。关于反应,对于观察者1和观察者2,3D US与CT在20例患者中的17例和18例中结果一致,一致性极佳(κ = 0.961)。
与CT肿瘤体积相比,使用个性化三维打印模型的3D US肿瘤体积是一种准确且可靠的反应评估方法。