Suppr超能文献

使用三维超声评估结直肠癌肝转移的治疗反应:基于CT图像的个性化三维打印肿瘤模型的应用

Therapeutic response assessment using 3D ultrasound for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer: Application of a personalized, 3D-printed tumor model using CT images.

作者信息

Choi Ye Ra, Kim Jung Hoon, Park Sang Joon, Hur Bo Yun, Han Joon Koo

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182596. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To evaluate accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) for response evaluation of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) using a personalized 3D-printed tumor model.

METHODS

Twenty patients with liver metastasis from CRC who underwent baseline and after chemotherapy CT, were retrospectively included. Personalized 3D-printed tumor models using CT were fabricated. Two radiologists measured volume of each 3D printing model using 3D US. With CT as a reference, we compared difference between CT and US tumor volume. The response evaluation was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.

RESULTS

3D US tumor volume showed no significant difference from CT volume (7.18 ± 5.44 mL, 8.31 ± 6.32 mL vs 7.42 ± 5.76 mL in CT, p>0.05). 3D US provided a high correlation coefficient with CT (r = 0.953, r = 0.97) as well as a high inter-observer intraclass correlation (0.978; 0.958-0.988). Regarding response, 3D US was in agreement with CT in 17 and 18 out of 20 patients for observer 1 and 2 with excellent agreement (κ = 0.961).

CONCLUSIONS

3D US tumor volume using a personalized 3D-printed model is an accurate and reliable method for the response evaluation in comparison with CT tumor volume.

摘要

背景与目的

使用个性化三维打印肿瘤模型评估三维超声(3D US)对结直肠癌(CRC)肝转移反应评估的准确性和可靠性。

方法

回顾性纳入20例接受基线及化疗后CT检查的CRC肝转移患者。使用CT制作个性化三维打印肿瘤模型。两名放射科医生使用3D US测量每个三维打印模型的体积。以CT为参照,我们比较了CT与US肿瘤体积之间的差异。反应评估基于实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)标准。

结果

3D US肿瘤体积与CT体积无显著差异(分别为7.18±5.44 mL、8.31±6.32 mL,而CT为7.42±5.76 mL,p>0.05)。3D US与CT具有较高的相关系数(r = 0.953,r = 0.97)以及较高的观察者间组内相关性(0.978;0.958 - 0.988)。关于反应,对于观察者1和观察者2,3D US与CT在20例患者中的17例和18例中结果一致,一致性极佳(κ = 0.961)。

结论

与CT肿瘤体积相比,使用个性化三维打印模型的3D US肿瘤体积是一种准确且可靠的反应评估方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验