• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Pharmacologic evaluation of loratadine (SCH 29851), chlorpheniramine and placebo.

作者信息

Batenhorst R L, Batenhorst A S, Graves D A, Foster T S, Kung M, Gural R P, Amkraut H J

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;31(2):247-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00606669.

DOI:10.1007/BF00606669
PMID:2879736
Abstract

The antihistaminic effect of loratadine (160 mg) was compared in twenty-four normal male volunteers to chlorpheniramine maleate (4 mg) and placebo in a double blinded 3-way cross-over study of latin square design. After receiving single oral doses of each medication, the wheal response to serial 0.1 ml intradermal histamine (2 micrograms) and saline (control) injections were recorded over a 24-h period. The calculated wheal areas were compared to base-line measurements. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance. Loratadine exhibited a more pronounced inhibition of histamine wheal formation than placebo or chlorpheniramine maleate (p less than 0.003). In contrast to chlorpheniramine maleate which had a duration of action of only 3 h, loratadine inhibited the response for the entire observation period between 1 and 24 h post-dose. Although sedation was observed less frequently with loratadine (Placebo, n = 2; chlorpheniramine, n = 3; and loratadine, n = 1), the relative incidence were not statistically significant.

摘要

相似文献

1
Pharmacologic evaluation of loratadine (SCH 29851), chlorpheniramine and placebo.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;31(2):247-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00606669.
2
A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, terfenadine, loratadine, astemizole, and chlorpheniramine versus placebo: suppressive effects on histamine-induced wheals and flares during 24 hours in normal subjects.西替利嗪、特非那定、氯雷他定、阿司咪唑和氯苯那敏与安慰剂的双盲、单剂量、交叉对照比较:对正常受试者24小时内组胺诱发风团和潮红的抑制作用
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990 Oct;86(4 Pt 1):540-7.
3
Suppression of histamine-induced wheal response by loratadine (SCH 29851) over 28 days in man.
Ann Allergy. 1986 Oct;57(4):253-6.
4
Central nervous system effects of H1-receptor antagonists in the elderly.H1受体拮抗剂对老年人中枢神经系统的影响。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Feb;82(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62590-2.
5
Clinical pharmacology of H1-antihistamines in the skin.H1 抗组胺药在皮肤中的临床药理学
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Nov;110(5):777-83. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.129123.
6
To evaluate and compare the effects of first generation anti-histamine (chlorpheniramine maleate) and second generation anti-histamine (loratadine) on isolated trachea of rabbit.评估并比较第一代抗组胺药(马来酸氯苯那敏)和第二代抗组胺药(氯雷他定)对兔离体气管的作用。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2004 Nov;54(11):556-61.
7
Suppression of histamine-induced skin reactions by loratadine and cetirizine diHCl.氯雷他定和盐酸西替利嗪对组胺诱导的皮肤反应的抑制作用。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;36(6):617-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00637746.
8
Efficacy and safety of loratadine suspension in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis.氯雷他定混悬液治疗儿童过敏性鼻炎的疗效与安全性。
Allergy. 1989 Aug;44(6):437-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1989.tb04176.x.
9
Comparative efficacy of bilastine, desloratadine and rupatadine in the suppression of wheal and flare response induced by intradermal histamine in healthy volunteers.比拉斯汀、地氯雷他定和卢帕他定对健康志愿者皮内注射组胺所致风团和潮红反应抑制作用的疗效比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jan;33(1):129-136. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1240665. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Comparative wheal and flare study of mizolastine vs terfenadine, cetirizine, loratadine and placebo in healthy volunteers.咪唑斯汀与特非那定、西替利嗪、氯雷他定及安慰剂在健康志愿者中的风团及红晕对比研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Nov;40(5):459-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.第二代抗组胺药:在过敏性疾病管理中的作用与疗效
Drugs. 2005;65(3):341-84. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565030-00004.
2
Comparative tolerability of second generation antihistamines.第二代抗组胺药的耐受性比较
Drug Saf. 1999 May;20(5):385-401. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199920050-00001.
3
Optimum pharmacological management of chronic rhinitis.慢性鼻炎的最佳药物治疗

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the CNS properties of SCH 29851, a potential non-sedating antihistamine.SCH 29851(一种潜在的非镇静性抗组胺药)的中枢神经系统特性评估。
Agents Actions. 1984 Jun;14(5-6):590-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01978891.
2
The evaluation of histamine antagonists in man.组胺拮抗剂在人体中的评估。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1971 Sep;3(4):215-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00565009.
3
A new approach to the use of histamine skin tests in the study of antihistamine drugs.一种在抗组胺药物研究中使用组胺皮肤试验的新方法。
Drugs. 1989 Aug;38(2):313-31. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198938020-00010.
4
Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy.氯雷他定。其药效学特性与治疗效果的初步综述。
Drugs. 1989 Jan;37(1):42-57. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198937010-00003.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1969 Mar-Apr;10(2):250-7. doi: 10.1002/cpt1969102250.
4
A comparison of triprolidine and clemastine on histamine antagonism and performance tests in man: implications for the mechanism of drug induced drowsiness.曲普利啶与氯马斯汀对人体组胺拮抗作用及行为测试的比较:对药物所致嗜睡机制的启示
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Aug 14;8(6):455-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00562321.