Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash University and Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
General Medical Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Central and Eastern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Nov;23(11):1961-1967. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
Opportunistic infections such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and invasive fungal disease (IFD) cause significant morbidity and mortality to recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). We aimed to characterize the risk and relationship of CMV reactivation post-HSCT to IFD in the current era of CMV viral load monitoring using highly sensitive plasma DNA. A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was conducted of consecutive patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT from January 2006 to December 2010 in Melbourne, Australia. CMV reactivation was defined as detection of plasma CMV DNA ≥ 546 IU/mL or development of CMV disease. IFD was classified in accordance with current international consensus guidelines. Of the 419 study participants, the median age was 44 years (IQR, 34 to 54), and CMV reactivation occurred in 106 participants (25%) at a median time of 56 days (IQR, 45 to 79). Thirty-eight participants (9.1%) were identified with 41 cases of IFD (n = 22 proven, n = 8 probable, n = 11 possible) at a median time of 76 days (IQR, 24 to 344). The incidence of IFD was higher in participants with CMV reactivation compared with no CMV reactivation (15% versus 7%, P = .012). In a multivariate analysis CMV reactivation remained an independent risk factor for IFD (hazard ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.6 to 8.5; P = .002). The cumulative incidence of all IFD in patients with and without CMV reactivation using a competing risk regression was a hazard ratio of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to 4.1; P = .017) and for late-onset IFD was a hazard ratio of 3.95 (95% CI, 1.7 to 9; P = .001). The median time to IFD onset was longer in participants with than without CMV reactivation (184 versus 37 days, P = .03). The peak viral load, detection of any level of viremia, and experiencing more than 1 episode of CMV reactivation were not associated with development of IFD. CMV reactivation in HSCT recipients in the post-transplant period is associated with an increased risk of developing late-onset IFD. Further research is warranted to understand the interaction between these 2 important infectious complications.
机会性感染,如巨细胞病毒(CMV)再激活和侵袭性真菌病(IFD),会导致造血干细胞移植(HSCT)受者出现显著的发病率和死亡率。本研究旨在描述在当前使用高灵敏度血浆 DNA 监测 CMV 病毒载量的时代,HSCT 后 CMV 再激活与 IFD 的风险和关系。采用回顾性队列研究,纳入 2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月在澳大利亚墨尔本接受异基因 HSCT 的连续患者。CMV 再激活定义为检测到血浆 CMV DNA≥546 IU/mL 或出现 CMV 疾病。IFD 按照现行国际共识指南进行分类。在 419 名研究参与者中,中位年龄为 44 岁(IQR,34 至 54),106 名参与者(25%)在中位时间 56 天(IQR,45 至 79)时出现 CMV 再激活。38 名参与者(9.1%)出现 41 例 IFD(n=22 例确诊,n=8 例可能,n=11 例可能),中位时间为 76 天(IQR,24 至 344)。与无 CMV 再激活的参与者相比,有 CMV 再激活的参与者 IFD 的发生率更高(15% 比 7%,P=0.012)。多变量分析显示,CMV 再激活仍然是 IFD 的独立危险因素(危险比,3.7;95%CI,1.6 至 8.5;P=0.002)。在使用竞争风险回归的有和无 CMV 再激活的患者中,所有 IFD 的累积发生率的危险比为 2.2(95%CI,1.2 至 4.1;P=0.017),晚期 IFD 的危险比为 3.95(95%CI,1.7 至 9;P=0.001)。有 CMV 再激活的参与者 IFD 发病时间中位数长于无 CMV 再激活的参与者(184 天比 37 天,P=0.03)。病毒载量峰值、任何水平的病毒血症检测以及经历超过 1 次 CMV 再激活均与 IFD 发生无关。HSCT 受者移植后 CMV 再激活与晚期发生 IFD 的风险增加相关。需要进一步研究以了解这两种重要感染并发症之间的相互作用。