Bartoli Andrea, El Hassani Y, Jenny B, Momjian S, Korff C M, Seeck M, Vulliemoz S, Schaller K
Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Medical Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Medical Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jan;41(1):125-132. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0888-y. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
Hemispherotomy is an established surgical technique to cure or palliate selected, mostly young patients suffering from refractory epilepsy. However, a few patients continue to have seizures despite the surgical hemispherical disconnection. We present a case series of patients who underwent redo hemispherotomy after a first unsuccessful hemispherical disconnection and provide a roadmap for subsequent workup and treatment. The institutional database of epilepsy surgery was reviewed. Twenty-four patients who underwent hemispherotomies for refractory epilepsy were identified between 2007 and 2016. Patients' notes were checked for demographics, history, clinical presentation, preoperative workup, medical treatment, age at first hemispherotomy, and surgical technique. Complications, histopathology, postoperative antiepileptic drug, and postoperative neurological follow-up were documented. Engel class was used to determine the outcome after surgery. Three patients (one hemimegalencephaly, one perinatal stroke, and one Rasmussen's disease) underwent redo hemispherotomy after electroencephalography and MRI studies with particular importance given to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to demonstrate residual connection between hemispheres. In one case, redo disconnection followed by a frontal lobectomy rendered the patient seizure-free (Engel class I). In one case, the seizure frequency remained the same but generalized seizures disappeared (Engel class III), and in one case, seizure frequency was considerably reduced after the redo disconnection (Engel class II), with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Surgical aspects, possible reasons of failure of first hemispherotomy, and rationale that led to second-look surgery are presented. Reasons for failure can be related to patient's selection and/or surgical aspects. Hemispherotomy is a technically demanding procedure and requires accurate preoperative workup. Redo hemispherotomy is a valid option on the basis of further epileptological and radiological workup to demonstrate residual interhemispheric connections and/or rule out bi-hemispheric epileptic activity.
大脑半球切除术是一种已确立的外科技术,用于治疗或缓解选定的、大多为患有难治性癫痫的年轻患者。然而,少数患者尽管进行了手术性大脑半球离断术,仍会继续发作。我们展示了一组病例,这些患者在首次大脑半球离断术失败后接受了再次大脑半球切除术,并提供了后续检查和治疗的路线图。对癫痫手术的机构数据库进行了回顾。在2007年至2016年期间,确定了24例因难治性癫痫接受大脑半球切除术的患者。检查患者病历以获取人口统计学、病史、临床表现、术前检查、药物治疗、首次大脑半球切除术时的年龄以及手术技术等信息。记录并发症、组织病理学、术后抗癫痫药物以及术后神经学随访情况。采用恩格尔分级来确定手术后的结果。三名患者(一名半侧巨脑症、一名围产期卒中、一名拉斯穆森病)在进行脑电图和MRI检查后接受了再次大脑半球切除术,其中特别重视扩散张量成像(DTI)以显示半球之间的残余连接。在一例中,再次离断术随后进行额叶切除术使患者无癫痫发作(恩格尔I级)。在一例中,癫痫发作频率保持不变,但全身性发作消失(恩格尔III级);在一例中,再次离断术后癫痫发作频率大幅降低(恩格尔II级),最短随访时间为2年。介绍了手术方面、首次大脑半球切除术失败的可能原因以及导致二次手术的理由。失败原因可能与患者选择和/或手术方面有关。大脑半球切除术是一项技术要求很高的手术,需要准确的术前检查。基于进一步的癫痫学和放射学检查以显示残余的半球间连接和/或排除双侧半球癫痫活动,再次大脑半球切除术是一种有效的选择。