Connor J M, Pirrit L A, Yates J R, Crossley J A, Imrie S J, Colgan J M
J Med Genet. 1987 Jan;24(1):14-22. doi: 10.1136/jmg.24.1.14.
Multipoint linkage analysis was undertaken with eight Xq cloned DNA sequences which identify one or more restriction fragment length polymorphisms in 26 families. These families comprise seven phase known normal families with three or more males in the third generation, seven families segregating for haemophilia B, one large family with dyskeratosis congenita, and 11 families with the fragile X syndrome. Phase known meioses informative for three or more loci supported the order centromere--DXYS1--DXS107--DXS102, DXS51--F9--FRAXA--DXS15, DXS52, F8--Xqter in each group of families studied. One of the normal families was segregating for protan colour blindness and showed a phase known recombination which would support the order centromere--F9--DXS52--CBP--Xqter. With the exception of DXYS1, all of these sequences have been localised to Xq27----qter by in situ hybridisation or hybridisation to Xq fragment panels, and on this basis should lie within 20 cM of one another. No recombination was observed between the sequences localised to Xq28, namely DXS52, F8, and DXS15 (between DXS15 and DXS52 Z = 12.25 at theta = 0 with confidence limits of 0 to 5 cM). However, an excess of recombination was apparent in the region of FRAXA with maximal lod scores as follows: F9 versus FRAXA (Z = 2.05, theta = 0.19), DXS52 versus FRAXA (Z = 1.85, theta = 0.26), and DXS15 versus FRAXA (Z = 1.33, theta = 0.27). No consistent differences were observed in the frequency of recombination when families with the fragile X syndrome were compared with normal families or families segregating for other X linked conditions. These results are compared with other published work and support the conclusion that although measurable linkage exists between these flanking markers and FRAXA, the intervals as measured by the frequency of meiotic recombination will seriously limit their clinical usefulness.
采用8个Xq克隆DNA序列进行多点连锁分析,这些序列可识别26个家系中的一种或多种限制性片段长度多态性。这些家系包括7个第三代中有3名或更多男性的已知相位的正常家系、7个血友病B分离家系、1个先天性角化不良的大家系以及11个脆性X综合征家系。对三个或更多位点有信息的已知相位减数分裂支持着丝粒-DXYS1-DXS107-DXS102、DXS51-F9-FRAXA-DXS15、DXS52、F8-Xq末端在每组研究家系中的顺序。其中一个正常家系正在分离红色盲,并显示出一个已知相位的重组,这将支持着丝粒-F9-DXS52-CBP-Xq末端的顺序。除DXYS1外,所有这些序列已通过原位杂交或与Xq片段板杂交定位到Xq27----q末端,在此基础上它们应该彼此位于20厘摩之内。在定位到Xq28的序列之间未观察到重组,即DXS52、F8和DXS15(在DXS15和DXS52之间,在θ=0时Z=12.25,置信区间为0至5厘摩)。然而,在FRAXA区域明显存在过多的重组,最大对数优势分数如下:F9与FRAXA(Z=2.05,θ=0.19)、DXS52与FRAXA(Z=1.85,θ=0.26)以及DXS15与FRAXA(Z=1.33,θ=0.27)。将脆性X综合征家系与正常家系或其他X连锁疾病分离家系进行比较时,在重组频率上未观察到一致的差异。将这些结果与其他已发表的工作进行比较,并支持以下结论:尽管这些侧翼标记与FRAXA之间存在可测量的连锁,但通过减数分裂重组频率测量的区间将严重限制它们的临床实用性。