Kadobera Daniel, Waiswa Peter, Peterson Stefan, Blencowe Hannah, Lawn Joy, Kerber Kate, Tumwesigye Nazarius Mbona
a Indepth Network Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Working Group , Iganga/Mayuge Health and Demographic Surveillance System , Iganga , Uganda.
b Ministry of Health , Department of Clinical Services , Kampala , Uganda.
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1356641. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1356641.
In most low and middle-income countries vital events registration for births and child deaths is poor, with reporting of pregnancy outcomes highly inadequate or non-existent. Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) sites and periodic population-based household-level surveys can be used to identify pregnancies and retrospectively capture pregnancy outcomes to provide data for decision making. However, little is known about the performance of different methods in identifying pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, yet this is critical in assessing improvements in reducing maternal and newborn mortality and stillbirths.
To explore differences between a population-based household pregnancy survey and prospective health demographic surveillance system in identifying pregnancies and their outcomes in rural eastern Uganda.
The study was done within the Iganga-Mayuge HDSS site, a member centre of the INDEPTH Network. Prospective data about pregnancies and their outcomes was collected in the routine biannual census rounds from 2006 to 2010 in the HDSS. In 2011 a cross-sectional survey using the pregnancy history survey (PHS) tool was conducted among women aged 15 to 49 years in the HDSS area. We compared differences between the HDSS biannual census updates and the PHS capture of pregnancies identified as well as neonatal and child deaths, stillbirths and abortions.
A total of 10,540 women aged 15 to 49 years were interviewed during the PHS. The PHS captured 12.8% more pregnancies than the HDSS in the most recent year (2010-2011), though between 2006 and 2010 (earlier periods) the PHS captured only 137 (0.8%) more pregnancies overall. The PHS also consistently identified more stillbirths (18.2%), spontaneous abortions (94.5%) and induced abortions (185.8%) than the prospective HDSS update rounds.
Surveillance sites are designed to prospectively track population-level outcomes. However, the PHS identified more pregnancy-related outcomes than the HDSS in this study. Asking about pregnancy and its outcomes may be a useful way to improve measurement of pregnancy outcomes. Further research is needed to identify the most effective methods of improving the capture of pregnancies and their outcomes within HDSS sites, household surveys and routine health information systems.
在大多数低收入和中等收入国家,出生及儿童死亡等重要事件的登记工作很不完善,妊娠结局的报告严重不足或根本不存在。卫生和人口监测系统(HDSS)站点以及定期的基于人群的家庭层面调查可用于识别妊娠情况,并回顾性获取妊娠结局,从而为决策提供数据。然而,对于不同方法在识别妊娠及妊娠结局方面的表现了解甚少,而这对于评估降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率及死产率方面的改善情况至关重要。
探讨在乌干达东部农村地区,基于人群的家庭妊娠调查与前瞻性卫生人口监测系统在识别妊娠及其结局方面的差异。
该研究在伊甘加 - 马尤格HDSS站点开展,这是深入网络的一个成员中心。在HDSS于2006年至2010年进行的常规半年一次的人口普查轮次中收集有关妊娠及其结局的前瞻性数据。2011年,在HDSS地区对15至49岁的女性进行了一项使用妊娠史调查(PHS)工具的横断面调查。我们比较了HDSS半年一次的人口普查更新数据与PHS在识别妊娠以及新生儿和儿童死亡、死产和流产方面的差异。
在PHS期间,共对10,540名15至49岁的女性进行了访谈。在最近一年(2010 - 2011年),PHS识别出的妊娠比HDSS多12.8%,不过在2006年至2010年(早期阶段),PHS总体上仅多识别出137例(0.8%)妊娠。与前瞻性的HDSS更新轮次相比,PHS还始终能识别出更多的死产(18.2%)、自然流产(94.5%)和人工流产(185.8%)。
监测站点旨在前瞻性地跟踪人群层面的结局。然而,在本研究中,PHS识别出的与妊娠相关的结局比HDSS更多。询问妊娠及其结局可能是改善妊娠结局测量的一种有用方法。需要进一步研究以确定在HDSS站点、家庭调查和常规卫生信息系统内改善妊娠及其结局捕获的最有效方法。