Frederix Ines, Vandijck Dominique, Hens Niel, De Sutter Johan, Dendale Paul
a Department of Cardiology , Jessa Hospital , Hasselt , Belgium.
b Faculty of Medicine & Life Sciences , Hasselt University , Diepenbeek , Belgium.
Acta Cardiol. 2018 Jun;73(3):222-229. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1361892. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
Cardiac rehabilitation for ischaemic heart disease effectively reduces cardiovascular readmission rate and mortality. Current uptake rates however, remain low. This study assesses the social and economic impact of increasing centre-based cardiac rehabilitation uptake and the additional value of cardiac telerehabilitation using cost-benefit analysis (CBA) in Belgium.
Cost-benefit analysis was conducted to analyse three scenarios: (1) current situation: 20% uptake rate of cardiac rehabilitation; (2) alternative scenario one: 40% uptake rate of cardiac rehabilitation; and (3) alternative scenario two: 20% uptake of cardiac rehabilitation and 20% uptake of both cardiac rehabilitation and telerehabilitation. Impacts considered included cardiac (tele)rehabilitation programme costs, direct inpatient costs, productivity losses and burden of disease.
Compared to the current situation, there was a net total monetised benefit of 9.18 M€ and 9.10 M€ for scenarios one and two, respectively. Disability Adjusted Life Years were 12,805-12,980 years lower than the current situation. This resulted in a benefit-cost ratio of 1.52 and 1.43 for scenarios one and two, respectively.
Increased cardiac rehabilitation uptake rates can reduce the burden of disease, and the resulting benefits exceed its costs. This research supports the necessity for greater promotion and routine referral to cardiac rehabilitation to be made standard practice. The implementation of telerehabilitation as an adjunct is to be encouraged, especially for those patients unable to attend centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.
缺血性心脏病的心脏康复可有效降低心血管疾病再入院率和死亡率。然而,目前的接受率仍然很低。本研究使用成本效益分析(CBA)评估在比利时提高基于中心的心脏康复接受率的社会和经济影响以及心脏远程康复的附加价值。
进行成本效益分析以分析三种情景:(1)现状:心脏康复接受率为20%;(2)替代情景一:心脏康复接受率为40%;(3)替代情景二:心脏康复接受率为20%且心脏康复和远程康复的接受率均为20%。考虑的影响包括心脏(远程)康复计划成本、直接住院成本、生产力损失和疾病负担。
与现状相比,情景一和情景二的货币化总净效益分别为918万欧元和910万欧元。伤残调整生命年比现状减少了12,805 - 12,980年。这导致情景一和情景二的效益成本比分别为1.52和1.43。
提高心脏康复接受率可减轻疾病负担,且产生的效益超过成本。本研究支持加大推广力度并将常规转诊至心脏康复作为标准做法的必要性。应鼓励实施远程康复作为辅助手段,特别是对于那些无法参加基于中心的心脏康复的患者。