• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良 Delphi 法在以患者和家属为中心的重症监护临床和研究重点中的应用

A modified Delphi process to identify clinical and research priorities in patient and family centred critical care.

机构信息

Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.008
PMID:28800520
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify elements which enable patient and family centred care (PFCC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and priorities for PFCC research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We engaged a panel of multidisciplinary stakeholders in a modified Delphi process. Items generated from a literature review and panelist suggestions were rated in 3 successive rounds on a scale from 1 to 7. Median score was used to rate each item's priority, with 5 or more indicating "essential priority," 4 or 5 "moderate priority" and 3 or less "low priority." Interquartile range (IQR) was used to measure consensus, with IQR of 1 indicating "high" consensus, 2 "moderate" consensus, and 3 or greater "low" consensus.

RESULTS

Six items were rated essential elements for facilitating PFCC with high consensus (flexible visiting hours, family participation in bedside care, trained family support person, interventions to facilitate continuity of care, staff education to support families, continuity of staff assignments). Three items were rated essential research topics: interventions to facilitate continuity of care following ICU discharge (moderate consensus), family participation in bedside care (low consensus), and decision aids for end of life decision-making (low consensus).

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholders identified clear and distinct priorities for PFCC in clinical care and research, though there was greater consensus for clinical care.

摘要

目的

确定重症监护病房(ICU)中以患者和家属为中心的护理(PFCC)的要素和 PFCC 研究的重点。

材料和方法

我们邀请了一组多学科利益相关者参与改良 Delphi 流程。从文献综述和小组成员建议中生成的项目在 3 轮中按 1 到 7 的等级进行评分。中位数评分用于评估每个项目的优先级,得分为 5 或以上表示“高度优先”,4 或 5 表示“中度优先”,3 或以下表示“低度优先”。四分位距(IQR)用于衡量共识,IQR 为 1 表示“高度”共识,2 表示“中度”共识,3 或更高表示“低度”共识。

结果

有 6 项被评为促进 PFCC 的基本要素,具有高度共识(灵活的探视时间、家属参与床边护理、受过培训的家庭支持人员、促进护理连续性的干预措施、支持家庭的员工教育、员工任务的连续性)。有 3 项被评为基本研究课题:促进 ICU 出院后护理连续性的干预措施(中度共识)、家属参与床边护理(低度共识)和生命终末期决策的决策辅助工具(低度共识)。

结论

利益相关者确定了明确的以患者和家属为中心的护理在临床护理和研究中的重点,尽管在临床护理方面的共识更高。

相似文献

1
A modified Delphi process to identify clinical and research priorities in patient and family centred critical care.改良 Delphi 法在以患者和家属为中心的重症监护临床和研究重点中的应用
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
2
Reconciling patient and provider priorities for improving the care of critically ill patients: A consensus method and qualitative analysis of decision making.协调患者和提供者的优先级,以改善危重症患者的护理:决策的共识方法和定性分析。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1367-1374. doi: 10.1111/hex.12576. Epub 2017 May 31.
3
Moving Forward Through Consensus: A Modified Delphi Approach to Determine the Top Research Priorities in Orthopaedic Oncology.通过共识推进:一种改进的德尔菲法确定骨肿瘤学的首要研究重点
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):3044-3055. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5482-7. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
Finding a Middle Ground: Exploring the Impact of Patient- and Family-Centered Design on Nurse-Family Interactions in the Neuro ICU.寻找中间地带:探索以患者和家庭为中心的设计对神经重症监护病房中护士-家庭互动的影响。
HERD. 2015 Fall;9(1):80-98. doi: 10.1177/1937586715593551. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
5
Aligning critical care interventions with patient goals: A modified Delphi study.使重症监护干预措施与患者目标保持一致:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Heart Lung. 2016 Nov-Dec;45(6):517-524. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005.以患者为中心的重症监护病房中支持家庭的临床实践指南:美国危重病医学会特别工作组,2004 - 2005年
Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):605-22. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254067.14607.EB.
7
Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study.支持 ICU 中生命维持治疗决策过程的框架:德尔菲研究的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):645-653. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221.
8
Consensus on the content of an instrument to measure person-centred teamwork: An e-Delphi study.关于衡量以患者为中心的团队合作的工具内容的共识:一项电子德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 May;33(5):1786-1797. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17042. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
9
Palliative Care Research and Clinical Practice Priorities in the United States as Identified by an Interdisciplinary Modified Delphi Approach.美国多学科改良德尔菲法确定的姑息治疗研究和临床实践重点。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Sep;27(9):1135-1145. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0664. Epub 2024 May 10.
10
Patient, family-centred care interventions within the adult ICU setting: An integrative review.成人重症监护病房环境下以患者和家庭为中心的护理干预措施:一项综合综述。
Aust Crit Care. 2016 Nov;29(4):179-193. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of a sensitive index system for nursing quality in the perioperative period of liver transplantation based on the Three-Dimensional Quality Structure theory.基于三维质量结构理论构建肝移植围手术期护理质量敏感指标体系
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12676-y.
2
Continuity Strategies for Long-Stay PICU Patients: Consensus Statements From the Lucile Packard Foundation PICU Continuity Panel.长期住院长达重症监护病房(PICU)患者的连续性策略:Lucile Packard 基金会 PICU 连续性专家组的共识声明。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct 1;24(10):849-861. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003308. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
Priorities for paediatric critical care research: a modified Delphi study by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group.
儿科重症监护研究的优先事项:澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护学会儿科研究小组的一项改良德尔菲研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(2):194-201. doi: 10.51893/2021.2.oa6. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Defining compassion: A Delphi study of compassion therapists' experiences when introducing patients to the term 'compassion'.定义怜悯:一项关于怜悯治疗师在向患者介绍“怜悯”一词时的体验的德尔菲研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2023 Mar;96(1):16-24. doi: 10.1111/papt.12423. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
5
Group Concept Mapping Conceptualizes High-Quality Care for Long-Stay Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients and Families.团体概念图构想了高质量的长期儿科重症监护病房患者和家庭的护理。
J Pediatr. 2023 Jan;252:48-55.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
6
A survey study of family members' encounters with healthcare services within the care of older people, psychiatric care, palliative care and diabetes care.一项关于老年人护理、精神科护理、姑息治疗和糖尿病护理中家庭成员在医疗保健服务方面遭遇的调查研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Dec;36(4):1228-1240. doi: 10.1111/scs.13096. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
7
Intensive care unit visiting using virtual technology: Barriers, solutions, and opportunities.使用虚拟技术进行重症监护病房探视:障碍、解决方案与机遇
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jun;70:103215. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103215. Epub 2022 Feb 15.