Hananta I Putu Yuda, van Dam Alje P, Bruisten Sylvia Maria, van der Loeff Maarten Franciscus Schim, Soebono Hardyanto, Christiaan de Vries Henry John
Deartment of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service (GGD) of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e016202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016202.
Gonorrhoea is a common sexually transmitted disease caused by (Ng) infection. Light microscopy of urogenital smears is used as a simple tool to diagnose urogenital gonorrhoea in many resource-limited settings. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of light microscopy to diagnose urogenital gonorrhoea as compared with a PCR-based test.
In 2014, we examined 632 male urethral and 360 endocervical smears in clinic-based and outreach settings in Jakarta, Yogyakarta and Denpasar, Indonesia. Using the detection of Ng DNA by a validated PCR as reference test, we evaluated the accuracy of two light microscopic criteria to diagnose urogenital gonorrhoea in genital smears: (1) the presence of intracellular Gram-negative diplococci (IGND) and (2) ≥5 polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNL)/oil-immersion field (oif) in urethral or ≥20 PMNL/oif in endocervical smears.
In male urethral smears, IGND testing had a sensitivity (95% CI), specificity (95% CI) and kappa±SE of 59.0% (50.1 to 67.4), 89.4% (86.3 to 91.9) and 0.49±0.04, respectively. For PMNL count, these were 59.0% (50.1 to 67.4), 83.7% (80.2 to 86.9) and 0.40±0.04, respectively. The accuracy of IGND in the clinic-based settings (72.0% (57.5 to 83.3), 95.2% (91.8 to 97.5) and 0.68±0.06, respectively) was better than in the outreach settings (51.2% (40.0 to 62.3), 83.4% (78.2 to 87.8) and 0.35±0.06, respectively). In endocervical smears, light microscopy performed poorly regardless of the setting or symptomatology, with kappas ranging from -0.09 to 0.24.
Light microscopy using IGND and PMNL criteria can be an option with moderate accuracy to diagnose urethral gonorrhoea among males in a clinic-based setting. The poor accuracy in detecting endocervical infections indicates an urgent need to implement advanced methods, such as PCR. Further investigations are needed to identify the poor diagnostic outcome in outreach services.
淋病是由淋病奈瑟菌(Ng)感染引起的常见性传播疾病。在许多资源有限的地区,泌尿生殖道涂片的光学显微镜检查被用作诊断泌尿生殖道淋病的一种简单工具。我们旨在评估光学显微镜诊断泌尿生殖道淋病的准确性,并与基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测方法进行比较。
2014年,我们在印度尼西亚雅加达、日惹和登巴萨的诊所及外展服务点检查了632份男性尿道涂片和360份宫颈涂片。以经过验证的PCR检测Ng DNA作为参考标准,我们评估了两种光学显微镜标准在诊断生殖器涂片泌尿生殖道淋病方面的准确性:(1)细胞内革兰氏阴性双球菌(IGND)的存在;(2)尿道涂片中每油镜视野(oif)≥5个多形核白细胞(PMNL),或宫颈涂片中每oif≥20个PMNL。
在男性尿道涂片中,IGND检测的敏感度(95%置信区间)、特异度(95%置信区间)和kappa±标准误分别为59.0%(50.1至67.4)、89.4%(86.3至91.9)和0.49±0.04。对于PMNL计数,这些指标分别为59.0%(50.1至67.4)、8