Pragst Fritz, Suesse Silke, Salomone Alberto, Vincenti Marco, Cirimele Vincent, Hazon Jayne, Tsanaclis Lolita, Kingston Robert, Sporkert Frank, Baumgartner Markus R
Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Charité, Turmstraße 21, Building N, 10559 Berlin, Germany.
DC Drogencheck GmbH, Sedanstr. 14, 89077 Ulm, Germany.
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Sep;278:326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
The consensus on alcohol markers in hair was revised for the fourth time by an expert group of the Society of Hair Testing based on current state of research. This revision was adopted by the members of the Society during the business meeting in Brisbane on August 29th 2016. For both markers, ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs), two cut-off values for discrimination between teetotalers or occasional low amount consumption and moderate alcohol drinking (low cut-off), and between non-excessive (abstinence up to moderate alcohol intake) and chronic excessive drinking (high cut-off value) were critically examined. For the current revision, the cut-off values for EtG (7pg/mg and 30pg/mg, respectively) remained unchanged despite different findings or discussions published in the meantime. This was mainly due to the lack of broader data collections from new studies with great numbers of volunteers following thorough study concepts. In contrast, an essential change of the consensus was accepted for the FAEEs, where the concentration of ethyl palmitate (E16:0) can be used autonomously for interpretation instead of the concentration sum (ΣFAEE) of the four esters ethyl myristate, ethyl palmitate, ethyl oleate and ethyl stearate, as previously applied. After evaluation of the data from seven laboratories, the E16:0 cut-off for abstinence assessment was defined at 0.12ng/mg for the 0-3cm segment and at 0.15ng/mg for the 0-6cm segment. The cut-off for chronic excessive drinking was fixed at 0.35ng/mg for the 0-3cm segment and at 0.45ng/mg for the 0-6cm segment. The use of E16:0 with these cut-offs in place of ΣFAEE for alcohol intake assessment produces only a minor loss in discrimination power, leads to no essential difference in the interpretation concerning chronic excessive alcohol consumption and is suitable to confirm EtG results in abstinence assessment if ethanol containing hair sprays or lotions are excluded.
毛发检测协会的一个专家小组根据当前的研究状况,第四次修订了毛发中酒精标志物的共识。2016年8月29日在布里斯班举行的业务会议上,协会成员通过了这一修订版。对于两种标志物,即乙基葡萄糖醛酸苷(EtG)和脂肪酸乙酯(FAEEs),严格审查了两个区分界限值,一个用于区分绝对戒酒者或偶尔少量饮酒者与适度饮酒者(低界限值),另一个用于区分非过量饮酒者(从戒酒到适度饮酒)与慢性过量饮酒者(高界限值)。对于此次修订版,尽管在此期间发表了不同的研究结果或讨论,但EtG的界限值(分别为7pg/mg和30pg/mg)保持不变。这主要是因为缺乏按照全面研究概念对大量志愿者进行新研究后更广泛的数据收集。相比之下,FAEEs的共识有了实质性变化,其中棕榈酸乙酯(E16:0)的浓度可自主用于解释,而不是像以前那样使用肉豆蔻酸乙酯、棕榈酸乙酯、油酸乙酯和硬脂酸乙酯这四种酯的浓度总和(ΣFAEE)。在评估了七个实验室的数据后,0 - 3厘米段用于戒酒评估的E16:0界限值定义为0.12ng/mg,0 - 6厘米段为0.15ng/mg。慢性过量饮酒的界限值在0 - 3厘米段固定为0.35ng/mg,0 - 6厘米段为0.45ng/mg。使用这些界限值的E16:0代替ΣFAEE进行酒精摄入量评估,在区分能力上只会有轻微损失,在关于慢性过量饮酒的解释上不会产生本质差异,并且在排除含乙醇的发胶或乳液的情况下,适用于在戒酒评估中确认EtG结果。