Suppr超能文献

宫腔镜下切除子宫内膜癌前病变及恶性息肉:它是子宫切除术的安全替代方案吗?

Hysterscopic Resection of Premalignant and Malignant Endometrial Polyps: Is it a Safe Alternative to Hysterectomy?

作者信息

Elyashiv Osnat, Sagiv Ron, Kerner Ram, Keidar Ran, Menczer Joseph, Levy Tally

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Wolfson Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wolfson Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wolfson Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1200-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The standard treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) and complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) is hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy. In the last decade several centers have attempted to perform hysteroscopic resection of malignant and premalignant polyps as an alternative to hysterectomy. In the present study we evaluated the safety of this procedure in regard to residual uterine pathology.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Women (n = 1766) who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy during the years 1998 to 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with CAH and endometrioid type EC in the removed polyps who underwent hysterectomy were included in the study. Patients with nonendometrioid pathology were excluded. The operative and pathologic reports of the hysteroscopy and hysterectomy procedures were revised.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Forty-three women (2.4%) were diagnosed with premalignant and malignant polyps: 21 with EC and 22 with CAH. Thirty-four women (79.0%) underwent hysterectomy and were included in the study group. The median age was 62 years (range, 35-83). Most women (79.4%) presented with postmenopausal bleeding or menorrhagia. In 13 patients (38.2%) more than 1 polyp was removed. The median size of the polyps was 2 cm (range, 1-4). In 27 women there were no other visible endometrial findings during the hysteroscopy except for the removed polyp. However, in 24 women (88.9%) residual CAH or EC was present in the hysterectomy specimen, mostly (55.6%) as multifocal lesions.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that hysteroscopic evaluation of the uterine cavity and polyp resection are not enough for the eradication of premalignant and malignant endometrial lesions. This alternative should be reserved for well-selected cases such as for fertility preservation and for patient with surgical risk factors that after the hysteroscopic polypectomy will receive further medical treatment.

摘要

研究目的

子宫内膜癌(EC)和复杂性非典型增生(CAH)的标准治疗方法是子宫切除术,可选择同时切除附件或不切除。在过去十年中,几个中心尝试通过宫腔镜切除恶性和癌前息肉来替代子宫切除术。在本研究中,我们评估了该手术在残留子宫病理方面的安全性。

设计

回顾性病历审查(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。

地点

大学医院。

患者

1998年至2016年间接受宫腔镜息肉切除术的女性(n = 1766)。

干预措施

研究纳入切除息肉中患有CAH和子宫内膜样型EC且接受子宫切除术的患者。排除非子宫内膜样病理患者。对宫腔镜检查和子宫切除术的手术及病理报告进行了复查。

测量指标和主要结果

43名女性(2.4%)被诊断患有癌前和恶性息肉:21例为EC,22例为CAH。34名女性(79.0%)接受了子宫切除术并被纳入研究组。中位年龄为62岁(范围35 - 83岁)。大多数女性(79.4%)表现为绝经后出血或月经过多。13例患者(38.2%)切除了不止1个息肉。息肉的中位大小为2厘米(范围1 - 4厘米)。27名女性在宫腔镜检查期间除了切除的息肉外没有其他可见的子宫内膜病变。然而,24名女性(88.9%)的子宫切除标本中存在残留的CAH或EC,大多(55.6%)为多灶性病变。

结论

我们的结果表明,宫腔镜评估子宫腔和息肉切除不足以根除癌前和恶性子宫内膜病变。这种替代方法应仅用于精心挑选的病例,如用于保留生育功能以及有手术风险因素且在宫腔镜息肉切除术后将接受进一步医学治疗的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验