文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

基于熟练程度的腹腔镜阑尾切除术虚拟现实模拟培训课程的开发。

Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.

作者信息

Sirimanna Pramudith, Gladman Marc A

机构信息

Academic Colorectal Unit, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2017 Oct;87(10):760-766. doi: 10.1111/ans.14135. Epub 2017 Aug 13.


DOI:10.1111/ans.14135
PMID:28803457
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proficiency-based virtual reality (VR) training curricula improve intraoperative performance, but have not been developed for laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA). This study aimed to develop an evidence-based training curriculum for LA. METHODS: A total of 10 experienced (>50 LAs), eight intermediate (10-30 LAs) and 20 inexperienced (<10 LAs) operators performed guided and unguided LA tasks on a high-fidelity VR simulator using internationally relevant techniques. The ability to differentiate levels of experience (construct validity) was measured using simulator-derived metrics. Learning curves were analysed. Proficiency benchmarks were defined by the performance of the experienced group. Intermediate and experienced participants completed a questionnaire to evaluate the realism (face validity) and relevance (content validity). RESULTS: Of 18 surgeons, 16 (89%) considered the VR model to be visually realistic and 17 (95%) believed that it was representative of actual practice. All 'guided' modules demonstrated construct validity (P < 0.05), with learning curves that plateaued between sessions 6 and 9 (P < 0.01). When comparing inexperienced to intermediates to experienced, the 'unguided' LA module demonstrated construct validity for economy of motion (5.00 versus 7.17 versus 7.84, respectively; P < 0.01) and task time (864.5 s versus 477.2 s versus 352.1 s, respectively, P < 0.01). Construct validity was also confirmed for number of movements, path length and idle time. Validated modules were used for curriculum construction, with proficiency benchmarks used as performance goals. CONCLUSION: A VR LA model was realistic and representative of actual practice and was validated as a training and assessment tool. Consequently, the first evidence-based internationally applicable training curriculum for LA was constructed, which facilitates skill acquisition to proficiency.

摘要

背景:基于熟练度的虚拟现实(VR)培训课程可提高术中表现,但尚未针对腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)开发。本研究旨在为LA制定基于证据的培训课程。 方法:共有10名经验丰富(>50例LA手术)、8名中级(10 - 30例LA手术)和20名经验不足(<10例LA手术)的操作者在高保真VR模拟器上使用国际相关技术执行有引导和无引导的LA任务。使用模拟器得出的指标来衡量区分经验水平的能力(结构效度)。分析学习曲线。由经验丰富的组的表现来定义熟练度基准。中级和经验丰富的参与者完成一份问卷以评估逼真度(表面效度)和相关性(内容效度)。 结果:18名外科医生中,16名(89%)认为VR模型在视觉上逼真,17名(95%)认为它代表了实际操作。所有“有引导”模块均显示出结构效度(P < 0.05),学习曲线在第6至9次训练之间趋于平稳(P < 0.01)。将经验不足者与中级者及经验丰富者进行比较时,“无引导”LA模块在动作经济性(分别为5.00、7.17和7.84;P < 0.01)和任务时间(分别为864.5秒、477.2秒和352.1秒,P < 0.01)方面显示出结构效度。动作数量、路径长度和空闲时间的结构效度也得到了证实。经过验证的模块用于课程构建,将熟练度基准用作表现目标。 结论:VR LA模型逼真且代表实际操作,并被验证为一种培训和评估工具。因此,构建了首个基于证据的适用于国际的LA培训课程,该课程有助于技能获取直至熟练掌握。

相似文献

[1]
Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.

ANZ J Surg. 2017-10

[2]
Development of a structured virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Am J Surg. 2019-5-6

[3]
Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Br J Surg. 2009-9

[4]
Development of an evidence-based training program for laparoscopic hysterectomy on a virtual reality simulator.

Surg Endosc. 2017-6

[5]
Development and implementation of a virtual reality laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum.

Am J Surg. 2017-12-12

[6]
A Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

J Surg Educ. 2016

[7]
Construct and face validity of a virtual reality-based camera navigation curriculum.

J Surg Res. 2012-6-17

[8]
Mastery-Based Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Curriculum: The First Step Toward Operative Robotic Proficiency.

J Surg Educ. 2017

[9]
Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.

Ir J Med Sci. 2018-11-19

[10]
A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial.

J Surg Educ. 2015

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparison of the Learning Pace of Medical Students and Surgical Residents in a Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulation.

Cureus. 2025-6-12

[2]
The Use of a Novel Virtual Reality Training Tool for Peritoneal Dialysis: Qualitative Assessment Among Health Care Professionals.

JMIR Med Educ. 2024-8-6

[3]
Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy- a systematic review.

Colorectal Dis. 2024-4

[4]
Development and clinical implementation of a structured, simulation-based training programme in laparoscopic appendectomy: description, validation and evaluation.

BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021-6-2

[5]
Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty.

SICOT J. 2021

[6]
Needs Assessment for a VR-Based Adult Nursing Simulation Training Program for Korean Nursing Students: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Group Interviews.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-11-29

[7]
Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial.

Surg Endosc. 2020-3

[8]
Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.

Ir J Med Sci. 2018-11-19

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索