• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚拟现实腹腔镜阑尾切除术模拟器的验证:一种使用认知任务分析的新方法。

Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK.

Maidstone Hospital, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, ME16 9QQ, UK.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):963-971. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1931-x. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-018-1931-x
PMID:30456516
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality (VR) simulation is a vital component of surgical training with demonstrated improvements in surgical quality and clinical outcome.

AIMS

To validate the LAP Mentor (Simbionix™) laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) VR simulator with inclusion of a novel tool, Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA).

METHODS

Thirty-two novices and nine experienced surgeons performed two simulated LAs. An expert-consensus questionnaire guided face validity assessment. Content validity was assessed using CTA-derived questions encompassing eight operative steps and four decision points. Construct validity was evaluated using dexterity metrics, masked assessment of surgical quality using the OSATS global rating scale, and mental workload from two validated tools: the NASA-TLX and SMEQ. Ten novices performed eight further LAs for learning curve assessment.

RESULTS

Face validity was demonstrated across all domains. Considering content validity, the essential technical and non-technical steps were evident. The experienced group performed the procedure quicker (median time 361 vs. 538 s, P = 0.0039) with fewer total movements (426 vs. 641, P < 0.0001) and shorter idle time (131 vs. 199 s, P = 0.0006). This correlated with higher OSATS scores (median 33.5 vs. 22.2, P < 0.0001) and lower mental demand (NASA-TLX: 9.0 vs. 13.75, P = 0.012; SMEQ: 60 vs. 80, P = 0.0025), indicating construct validity. Learning curve data showed statistically significant improvements after the 7th session for procedure time, total movements and idle time, which correlated with reduction in mental demand.

CONCLUSIONS

The LAP Mentor demonstrates face, content and construct validity for LA; thus, it can be used as an effective tool in surgical training. Task repetition leads to achievement of expert benchmarks.

摘要

背景

虚拟现实 (VR) 模拟是手术培训的重要组成部分,已证明其可提高手术质量和临床效果。

目的

验证 LAP Mentor(Simbionix™)腹腔镜阑尾切除术 (LA) VR 模拟器,其中包含一种新工具,认知任务分析 (CTA)。

方法

32 名新手和 9 名经验丰富的外科医生进行了两次模拟 LA。采用专家共识问卷进行表面效度评估。内容效度使用 CTA 衍生问题进行评估,涵盖 8 个操作步骤和 4 个决策点。使用灵巧度指标评估构念效度,使用 OSATS 全球评分量表对手术质量进行掩蔽评估,使用两个经过验证的工具:NASA-TLX 和 SMEQ 评估心理工作量。10 名新手进行了另外 8 次 LA 以评估学习曲线。

结果

所有领域均表现出表面效度。考虑到内容效度,明显存在必要的技术和非技术步骤。经验丰富的组完成手术更快(中位数时间 361 与 538s,P=0.0039),总运动次数更少(426 与 641,P<0.0001),空闲时间更短(131 与 199s,P=0.0006)。这与更高的 OSATS 评分(中位数 33.5 与 22.2,P<0.0001)和较低的心理需求(NASA-TLX:9.0 与 13.75,P=0.012;SMEQ:60 与 80,P=0.0025)相关,表明具有构念效度。学习曲线数据表明,在第 7 次手术后,手术时间、总运动次数和空闲时间均有统计学意义的改善,这与心理需求的降低相关。

结论

LAP Mentor 对 LA 具有表面、内容和构念效度,因此可作为手术培训的有效工具。任务重复导致达到专家基准。

相似文献

1
Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.虚拟现实腹腔镜阑尾切除术模拟器的验证:一种使用认知任务分析的新方法。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):963-971. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1931-x. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
2
Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.基于熟练程度的腹腔镜阑尾切除术虚拟现实模拟培训课程的开发。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Oct;87(10):760-766. doi: 10.1111/ans.14135. Epub 2017 Aug 13.
3
Psychomotor skills and cognitive load training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for tubal surgery is effective.经虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器进行的精神运动技能和认知负荷训练对于输卵管手术是有效的。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(2):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
4
Development of a structured virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.开发一种结构化的虚拟现实腹腔镜阑尾切除术课程。
Am J Surg. 2020 Apr;219(4):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.腹腔镜摄像头导航的结构效度、表面效度及任务工作量:圣安东尼奥胃肠内镜外科医师学会学习中心的虚拟现实与视频训练系统比较
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1158-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9112-9. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
6
Development of an evidence-based training program for laparoscopic hysterectomy on a virtual reality simulator.基于虚拟现实模拟器的腹腔镜子宫切除术循证培训计划的制定
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2474-2482. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5249-3. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
7
Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator.全腹腔镜子宫切除术客观评估工具的开发:专家德尔菲法及虚拟现实模拟器评估
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190580. eCollection 2018.
8
Validation of a novel basic virtual reality simulator, the LAP-X, for training basic laparoscopic skills.一种新型基础虚拟现实模拟器LAP-X用于基础腹腔镜技能培训的验证。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2014 Oct;23(5):287-93. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.903853. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
9
Prospective Cohort Study of Haptic Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Learning Curve Trajectory.触觉虚拟现实腹腔镜阑尾切除术学习曲线轨迹的前瞻性队列研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1128-1134. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0332. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
10
Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?虚拟现实模拟器训练在腹腔镜结直肠切除术中的应用:哪些指标具有构建效度?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):210-4. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000031.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovative approaches to pericardiocentesis training: a comparative study of 3D-printed and virtual reality simulation models.心包穿刺术培训的创新方法:3D打印模型与虚拟现实模拟模型的对比研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Apr 4;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00348-0.
2
Ergonomics in Laparoscopic Box Training and Virtual Reality (VR) Simulations: A Systematic Review.腹腔镜箱式训练和虚拟现实(VR)模拟中的人体工程学:一项系统综述。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 20;16(12):e76107. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76107. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Theoretical foundations and implications of augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality for immersive learning in health professions education.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.基于熟练程度的腹腔镜阑尾切除术虚拟现实模拟培训课程的开发。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Oct;87(10):760-766. doi: 10.1111/ans.14135. Epub 2017 Aug 13.
2
Validation of a Cognitive Task Simulation and Rehearsal Tool for Open Carpal Tunnel Release.开放性腕管松解术认知任务模拟与预演工具的验证
Arch Plast Surg. 2017 May;44(3):223-227. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.223. Epub 2017 May 22.
3
Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis ?A systematic review and meta-analysis.
增强现实、虚拟现实和混合现实在健康职业教育沉浸式学习中的理论基础及意义。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Sep 9;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00311-5.
4
Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy- a systematic review.结直肠外科和阑尾切除术的培训和评估-系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):597-608. doi: 10.1111/codi.16905. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
5
Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper.微创急诊消化外科学培训课程:2022 WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w.
6
Validity assessment of the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy module of the LapVision virtual reality simulator.LapVision虚拟现实模拟器的腹腔镜根治性肾切除术模块的有效性评估
Surg Open Sci. 2019 Nov 1;2(1):51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2019.08.003. eCollection 2020 Jan.
腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎是否可行?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项评估结局和成本效益的回顾性队列研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5. eCollection 2016.
5
WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.WSES耶路撒冷急性阑尾炎诊断与治疗指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 18;11:34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5. eCollection 2016.
6
Face, content, construct, and concurrent validity of a novel robotic surgery patient-side simulator: the Xperience™ Team Trainer.新型机器人手术患者端模拟器Xperience™团队训练器的表面效度、内容效度、结构效度和同时效度。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3334-44. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4607-x. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
Evaluation of three sources of validity evidence for a laparoscopic duodenal atresia repair simulator.腹腔镜十二指肠闭锁修复模拟器三种效度证据来源的评估
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Mar;25(3):256-60. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0358. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
8
Face, content, and construct validity of the EndoViS training system for objective assessment of psychomotor skills of laparoscopic surgeons.用于客观评估腹腔镜外科医生心理运动技能的EndoViS培训系统的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3392-403. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4032-6. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
Virtual reality simulators and training in laparoscopic surgery.虚拟现实模拟器和腹腔镜手术培训。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
10
Validation of a novel basic virtual reality simulator, the LAP-X, for training basic laparoscopic skills.一种新型基础虚拟现实模拟器LAP-X用于基础腹腔镜技能培训的验证。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2014 Oct;23(5):287-93. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.903853. Epub 2014 Apr 29.