• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾性评估 BIG 评分对儿科钝性创伤患者死亡率的预测价值。

Retrospective evaluation of the BIG score to predict mortality in pediatric blunt trauma.

机构信息

*Division of Pediatrics,Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Sainte-Justine,Montreal,QC.

†Division of Surgery,Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Sainte-Justine,Montreal,QC.

出版信息

CJEM. 2018 Jul;20(4):592-599. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.379. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1017/cem.2017.379
PMID:28803574
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study's objective was to measure the criterion validity of the BIG score (a new pediatric trauma score composed of the initial base deficit [BD], international normalized ratio [INR], and Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]) to predict in-hospital mortality among children admitted to the emergency department with blunt trauma requiring an admission to the intensive care unit, knowing that a score <16 identifies children with a high probability of survival.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study performed in a single tertiary care pediatric hospital between 2008 and 2016. Participants were all children admitted to the emergency department for a blunt trauma requiring intensive care unit admission or who died in the emergency department. The primary analysis was the association between a BIG score ≥16 and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight children died among the 336 who met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred eighty-four children had information on the three components of the BIG score, and they were included in the primary analysis. A BIG score ≥16 demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.98) and specificity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87) to identify mortality. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve was higher for the BIG score (0.97; 95% IC: 0.95-0.99) in comparison to the Injury Severity Score (0.78; 95% IC: 0.71-0.85).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort, the BIG score was an excellent predictor of survival for children admitted to the emergency department following a blunt trauma.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测量 BIG 评分(一种新的儿科创伤评分,由初始基础缺陷[BD]、国际标准化比值[INR]和格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]组成)对因钝器伤需入住重症监护病房而收入急诊科的儿童院内死亡率的预测的标准效度,已知评分<16 可识别出具有高生存率的儿童。

方法

这是一项在 2008 年至 2016 年间在一家三级儿童专科医院进行的回顾性队列研究。所有参与者均为因钝器伤需入住重症监护病房或在急诊科死亡而收入急诊科的儿童。主要分析是 BIG 评分≥16 与院内死亡率之间的关系。

结果

在符合纳入标准的 336 名儿童中,有 28 名死亡。284 名儿童有 BIG 评分的三个组成部分的信息,他们被纳入主要分析。BIG 评分≥16 对死亡率的敏感性为 0.93(95%置信区间[CI]:0.76-0.98),特异性为 0.83(95% CI:0.78-0.87)。使用受试者工作特征曲线,BIG 评分(0.97;95% CI:0.95-0.99)的曲线下面积高于损伤严重度评分(0.78;95% CI:0.71-0.85)。

结论

在这项回顾性队列研究中,BIG 评分是预测因钝器伤收入急诊科的儿童生存率的一个极好指标。

相似文献

1
Retrospective evaluation of the BIG score to predict mortality in pediatric blunt trauma.回顾性评估 BIG 评分对儿科钝性创伤患者死亡率的预测价值。
CJEM. 2018 Jul;20(4):592-599. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.379. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
2
The BIG Score and Prediction of Mortality in Pediatric Blunt Trauma.小儿钝性创伤的 BIG 评分与死亡率预测。
J Pediatr. 2015 Sep;167(3):593-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.041. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
3
The Base Deficit, International Normalized Ratio, and Glasgow Coma Scale (BIG) Score, and Functional Outcome at Hospital Discharge in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患儿的基础赤字、国际标准化比值、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(BIG)评分与住院期间功能预后的关系
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;20(10):970-979. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002050.
4
Initial emergency department trauma scores from the OPALS study: the case for the motor score in blunt trauma.OPALS研究中急诊科最初的创伤评分:钝性创伤中运动评分的依据
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Aug;11(8):834-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb00764.x.
5
Use of the BIG score to predict mortality in pediatric trauma.利用 BIG 评分预测儿科创伤患者的死亡率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:472-475. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.060. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
Comparison of the trauma and injury severity score and modified early warning score with rapid lactate level (the ViEWS-L score) in blunt trauma patients.比较创伤和损伤严重程度评分与改良早期预警评分与快速乳酸水平(ViEWS-L 评分)在钝性创伤患者中的应用。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32836192d6.
7
Comparison of the predictive performance of the BIG, TRISS, and PS09 score in an adult trauma population derived from multiple international trauma registries.比较源自多个国际创伤登记处的成年创伤人群中BIG、TRISS和PS09评分的预测性能。
Crit Care. 2013 Jul 11;17(4):R134. doi: 10.1186/cc12813.
8
Appraisal of early evaluation of blunt chest trauma: development of a standardized scoring system for initial clinical decision making.钝性胸部创伤早期评估的评价:用于初始临床决策的标准化评分系统的开发
J Trauma. 2000 Sep;49(3):496-504. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200009000-00018.
9
Pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: the McGovern screening score.小儿钝性脑血管损伤:麦戈文筛查评分
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Jun;21(6):639-649. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.PEDS17498. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
10
Outcome of cardiovascular collapse in pediatric blunt trauma.小儿钝性创伤中心血管衰竭的结局
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jun;23(6):1229-35. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70346-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Can the BIG score reliably predict outcomes in pediatric traumatic brain ınjury?BIG评分能否可靠地预测小儿创伤性脑损伤的预后?
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 Apr 1;41(1):147. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06809-1.
2
How significant is the BIG score in childhood traumatic brain injury?儿童创伤性脑损伤中BIG评分的意义有多大?
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Jun;40(6):1827-1831. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06315-w. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
The prognostic value of an age-adjusted BIG score in adult patients with traumatic brain injury.年龄校正后的BIG评分在成年创伤性脑损伤患者中的预后价值。
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 2;14:1272994. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1272994. eCollection 2023.