Brooke Army Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, MCHE-ZDP, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, United States of America.
Baylor College of Medicine, Section of Critical Care Medicine, 6651 Main St., Legacy Tower, MC:E1420, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:472-475. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.060. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
The BIG score, which is comprised of admission base deficit (B), International Normalized Ratio (I), and GCS (G), is a severity of illness score that can be used to rapidly predict in-hospital mortality in pediatric patients presenting following traumatic injury. We sought to compare the mortality prediction of the pediatric trauma BIG score with other well-established pediatric trauma severity of illness scores: the pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD); the pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM2); and the pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM III).
In this retrospective cohort study, data from 2009 to 2015 was collected using a multi-institutional database. All pediatric patients admitted following traumatic injury with a recorded initial GCS were included. BIG, PELOD, PIM2, and PRISM III scores were calculated, and Receiver Operator Characteristic curves were derived for all severity of illness scores. Mortality prediction performance for each score was compared by the area under the curve (AUC).
A total of 29,204 patients were included in this analysis. AUC for BIG, PELOD, PIM2, and PRISM III scores were 0.97 (0.97-0.98), 0.98 (0.98-0.98), 0.98 (0.97-0.98), and 0.99 (0.98-0.99), respectively. At the optimum cut-off point of 16, the BIG score had a sensitivity of 0.937, specificity of 0.938, positive predictive value of 0.514, and negative predictive value of 0.995.
In this massive cohort of pediatric trauma patients, the BIG score using imputation of missing variables performed similarly to the PELOD, PIM2, and PRISM III, further validating the score as a predictor of mortality.
BIG 评分由入院基础缺失(B)、国际标准化比值(I)和 GCS(G)组成,是一种可用于快速预测创伤后就诊的儿科患者院内死亡率的疾病严重程度评分。我们旨在比较儿科创伤 BIG 评分与其他成熟的儿科创伤严重程度评分(小儿 logistic 器官功能障碍评分(PELOD)、小儿死亡率 2 评分(PIM2)和小儿死亡率风险评分(PRISM III))的死亡率预测能力。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用多机构数据库收集了 2009 年至 2015 年的数据。所有因创伤后就诊且初始 GCS 记录的儿科患者均纳入研究。计算 BIG、PELOD、PIM2 和 PRISM III 评分,并绘制所有疾病严重程度评分的受试者工作特征曲线。通过曲线下面积(AUC)比较各评分的死亡率预测性能。
共有 29204 例患者纳入本分析。BIG、PELOD、PIM2 和 PRISM III 评分的 AUC 分别为 0.97(0.97-0.98)、0.98(0.98-0.98)、0.98(0.97-0.98)和 0.99(0.98-0.99)。在最佳截断点 16 时,BIG 评分的敏感性为 0.937,特异性为 0.938,阳性预测值为 0.514,阴性预测值为 0.995。
在本大量儿科创伤患者队列中,使用缺失变量推断的 BIG 评分与 PELOD、PIM2 和 PRISM III 评分表现相似,进一步验证了该评分作为死亡率预测指标的有效性。