• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型 1 L 聚乙二醇基肠道准备 NER1006 用于全面和右侧结肠清洗:与三硫酸盐相比的随机对照 3 期试验。

Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate.

机构信息

Associated Gastroenterology Medical Group, Anaheim, California, USA.

Clinical Development, Norgine Ltd, Harefield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):677-687.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.047
PMID:28803744
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

NER1006 is the first 32 fluid ounce (1 L) polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation. This randomized, multicenter, colonoscopist/central reader-blinded phase 3 non-inferiority trial assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of NER1006 versus trisulfate for bowel cleansing.

METHODS

Patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized (1:1) to receive NER1006 or trisulfate, using evening/morning split-dosing administration. Blinded central readers used the validated Harefield Cleansing Scale to evaluate 2 alternative primary endpoints: overall bowel-cleansing success and high-quality cleansing of the ascending colon/cecum. Secondary endpoints included lesion detection, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) assessment, and adherence. The non-inferiority margin was 10% and the significance threshold was P < .025.

RESULTS

Of 621 patients randomized (NER1006, n=310; trisulfate, n=311), 556 were evaluated for efficacy (NER1006, n=276; trisulfate, n=280). NER1006 achieved non-inferiority versus trisulfate for both primary endpoints of overall bowel-cleansing success (85.1% vs 85.0%; difference, 0.14%; one-sided 97.5% lower confidence limit [LCL], -8.15%; P = .528) and high-quality cleansing of the ascending colon/cecum (35.9% versus 29.3%; difference, 6.58%; LCL, -1.69%; P = .059). BBPS assessments supported overall bowel-cleansing success rates. Lesion detection rates were similar between the groups. The percentage of patients with treatment-related adverse events was 14.9% with NER1006 and 9.4% with trisulfate. Both bowel preparations showed similar overall tolerability and safety profiles. Adherence was very high in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

With evening/morning split dosing, NER1006 was as effective as trisulfate for overall bowel and right-sided colon cleansing. Adverse event rates were slightly higher with NER1006 than trisulfate, but did not compromise tolerability, adherence, or efficacy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02254486.).

摘要

背景和目的

NER1006 是首个 32 液盎司(1 升)聚乙二醇基肠道准备制剂。这是一项随机、多中心、由结肠镜检查医生/中心读片员设盲的 3 期非劣效性试验,旨在评估 NER1006 与三磺酸钠用于肠道清洁的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

方法

接受结肠镜检查的患者按 1:1 随机(双盲)分为 NER1006 组或三磺酸钠组,采用早晚分剂量给药。中心读片员采用经验证的 Harefield 清洁评分量表评估 2 个替代主要终点:总体肠道清洁成功率和升结肠/盲肠的高质量清洁度。次要终点包括病变检出率、波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分和依从性。非劣效性边界为 10%,显著性阈值为 P<0.025。

结果

在 621 例随机分组(NER1006 组 310 例,三磺酸钠组 311 例)的患者中,556 例接受了疗效评估(NER1006 组 276 例,三磺酸钠组 280 例)。NER1006 与三磺酸钠相比,在总体肠道清洁成功率(85.1% vs 85.0%;差值,0.14%;单侧 97.5%置信下限 [LCL],-8.15%;P=0.528)和升结肠/盲肠的高质量清洁度(35.9% vs 29.3%;差值,6.58%;LCL,-1.69%;P=0.059)这 2 个主要终点均达到非劣效性。BBPS 评估支持总体肠道清洁成功率。两组的病变检出率相似。NER1006 组和三磺酸钠组治疗相关不良事件的发生率分别为 14.9%和 9.4%。两种肠道准备药物的总体耐受性和安全性相似。两组的依从性均非常高。

结论

采用早晚分剂量给药,NER1006 在总体肠道和右半结肠清洁方面与三磺酸钠同样有效。NER1006 组的不良事件发生率略高于三磺酸钠组,但并未影响耐受性、依从性或疗效。(临床试验注册号:NCT02254486.)

相似文献

1
Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate.新型 1 L 聚乙二醇基肠道准备 NER1006 用于全面和右侧结肠清洗:与三硫酸盐相比的随机对照 3 期试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):677-687.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
2
Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial.1 L NER1006 与 2 L 聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸相比的结肠清洁效果和安全性:一项随机 3 期试验。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):60-72. doi: 10.1055/a-0638-8125. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial.使用 1 L NER1006 与聚乙二醇电解质散和柠檬酸镁对比的肠道清洁效果和安全性:一项随机 3 期试验。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):73-84. doi: 10.1055/a-0639-5070. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation (NER1006): proof of concept assessment versus standard 2 L polyethylene glycol with ascorbate - a randomized, parallel group, phase 2, colonoscopist-blinded trial.新型 1 L 聚乙二醇为基础的肠道准备(NER1006):与标准的 2 L 聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸的概念验证评估——一项随机、平行分组、盲法、结肠镜检查者的 2 期临床试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 May 30;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-0988-y.
5
Efficacy and safety of split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate compared with 2 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate in a Korean population: a phase IV, multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study.在韩国人群中,1 L 聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸与 2 L 聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸相比,分剂量肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项四期、多中心、随机、内镜盲法研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Mar;95(3):500-511.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
6
Improved high-quality colon cleansing with 1L NER1006 versus 2L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate or oral sulfate solution.与 2L 聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸或口服硫酸盐溶液相比,使用 1L NER1006 可改善高质量的结肠清洁效果。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Dec;51(12):1671-1677. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
7
Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter observational study.结肠镜检查前极低容量准备的效果:一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1950-1961. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1950.
8
1L NER1006 can improve rates of adequate and high-quality bowel cleansing in the right colon: a post hoc analysis of two randomised clinical trials.1L NER1006 可提高右半结肠充分且高质量肠道准备的达标率:两项随机临床试验的事后分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 25;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02106-2.
9
Effectiveness and safety of NER1006 versus standard bowel preparations: A meta-analysis of randomized phase-3 clinical trials.NER1006 与标准肠道准备的有效性和安全性:随机 3 期临床试验的荟萃分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Aug;52(8):833-839. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.05.046. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Split dosing with a low-volume preparation is not inferior to split dosing with a high-volume preparation for bowel cleansing in patients with a history of colorectal resection: a randomized trial.小容量分次给药在肠道清洁方面不劣于大容量分次给药,用于有结直肠切除史的患者:一项随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):917-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391987. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of 1 L PEG-ASC Preparation for Colonoscopy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Multicenter Observational Study.1升聚乙二醇-抗坏血酸制剂用于炎症性肠病患者结肠镜检查的有效性和安全性:一项多中心观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 16;14(14):5043. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145043.
2
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服硫酸溶液与聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
DEN Open. 2025 Apr 16;5(1):e70113. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70113. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Real-world effectiveness and safety of 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in patients aged 80 years or older.
1L聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸用于80岁及以上患者肠道准备的真实世界有效性和安全性。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Feb 26;13:a25259938. doi: 10.1055/a-2525-9938. eCollection 2025.
4
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Bowel cleansing effectiveness and safety of 1L PEG + Asc in the real-world setting: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study of over 13000 patients.1L聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸在现实环境中的肠道清洁效果及安全性:对13000多名患者的观察性、回顾性、多中心研究
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Aug 16;11(8):E785-E793. doi: 10.1055/a-2125-0025. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Efficacy and safety of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly: comparison with oral sulfate solution.1L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效和安全性:与口服硫酸镁溶液的比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(5):651-660. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.030. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
7
Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature.影响结肠镜检查困难患者肠道准备质量的因素:来自文献的证据。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 21;29(11):1685-1707. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1685.
8
Comparison of optimal bowel cleansing effects of 1L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: A randomized controlled study.1L 聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸与匹可硫酸钠联合柠檬酸钾用于肠道准备的效果比较:一项随机对照研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279631. eCollection 2022.
9
Predictive Factors of Adequate Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy in the Elderly: A Retrospective Analysis of a Prospective Cohort.老年人结肠镜检查肠道准备充分的预测因素:一项前瞻性队列的回顾性分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 19;12(11):2867. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112867.
10
Transient alterations in plasma sodium concentrations with NER1006 bowel preparation: an analysis of three phase III, randomized clinical trials.NER1006 肠道准备过程中血浆钠浓度的一过性改变:三项 III 期随机临床试验分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02484-7.