Transfusion Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Transfusion Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Transfus Med Rev. 2018 Jan;32(1):6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
Optimal dose, timing and ratio to red blood cells (RBC) of blood component therapy (fresh frozen plasma [FFP], platelets, cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate) to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically bleeding patients requiring massive transfusion is unknown. We performed a systematic review for randomized controlled trials (RCT) in MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed the Transfusion Evidence Library and using multiple clinical trials registries to 21 February 2017. Sixteen RCTs were identified: six completed (five in adult trauma patients, one pediatric burn patients) and ten ongoing trials. Of the completed trials: three were feasibility trials, comparing a FFP, platelets and RBC ratio of 1:1:1 to laboratory-guided transfusion practice [n=69], early cryoprecipitate compared to standard practice [n=41], and early fibrinogen concentrate compared to placebo [n=45]; one trial compared the effect of FFP, platelets and RBC ratio of 1:1:1 with 1:1:2 on 24-hour and 30-day mortality [n=680]; one compared whole blood to blood component therapy on 24-hour blood use [n=107]; one compared a FFP to RBC ratio of 1:1 with 1:4 [n=16]. Data from two trials were pooled in a meta-analysis for 28-day mortality because the transfusion ratios achieved were similar. Results from these two trials suggest higher transfusion ratios were associated with transfusion of more FFP and platelets without evidence of significant difference with respect to mortality or morbidity. On the limited evidence available, there is insufficient basis to recommend a 1:1:1 over a 1:1:2 ratio or standard care for adult patients with critical bleeding requiring massive transfusion.
对于需要大量输血的严重出血患者,减少发病率和死亡率所需的血液成分治疗(新鲜冷冻血浆[FFP]、血小板、冷沉淀或纤维蛋白原浓缩物)的最佳剂量、时机和与红细胞(RBC)的比例尚不清楚。我们在 MEDLINE、The Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL、PubMed 输血证据库以及使用多个临床试验注册中心进行了系统评价,检索时间截至 2017 年 2 月 21 日。共确定了 16 项 RCT:6 项已完成(5 项在成人创伤患者中,1 项在儿科烧伤患者中),10 项正在进行中。已完成的试验中有 3 项是可行性试验,比较了 FFP、血小板和 RBC 比例为 1:1:1 与实验室指导的输血实践[n=69]、早期冷沉淀与标准实践[n=41]以及早期纤维蛋白原浓缩物与安慰剂[n=45];一项试验比较了 FFP、血小板和 RBC 比例为 1:1:1 与 1:1:2 对 24 小时和 30 天死亡率的影响[n=680];一项试验比较了全血与血液成分治疗对 24 小时血液使用量的影响[n=107];一项试验比较了 FFP 与 RBC 比例为 1:1 与 1:4[n=16]。由于达到的输血比例相似,因此两项试验的数据被汇总进行了 28 天死亡率的荟萃分析。这两项试验的结果表明,更高的输血比例与输注更多的 FFP 和血小板相关,但在死亡率或发病率方面没有显著差异。根据现有的有限证据,对于需要大量输血的严重出血的成年患者,没有足够的依据推荐使用 1:1:1 比 1:1:2 比例或标准治疗。