• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有已知最大值和最小值的可调坚固景观。

Tunably Rugged Landscapes With Known Maximum and Minimum.

作者信息

Manukyan Narine, Eppstein Margaret J, Buzas Jeffrey S

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401 USA.

Department and Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401 USA.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2016 Apr;20(2):263-274. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2015.2454857. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1109/TEVC.2015.2454857
PMID:28804241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5553988/
Abstract

We propose landscapes as a new class of tunably rugged benchmark problems. landscapes are well defined on alphabets of any arity, including both discrete and real-valued alphabets, include epistasis in a natural and transparent manner, are proven to have known value and location of the global maximum and, with some additional constraints, are proven to also have a known global minimum. Empirical studies are used to illustrate that, when coefficients are selected from a recommended distribution, the ruggedness of landscapes is smoothly tunable and correlates with several measures of search difficulty. We discuss why these properties make landscapes preferable to both landscapes and Walsh polynomials as benchmark landscape models with tunable epistasis.

摘要

我们提出将景观作为一类新的具有可调崎岖度的基准问题。景观在任何元数的字母表上都有明确的定义,包括离散和实值字母表,以自然且透明的方式包含上位性,已被证明具有已知的全局最大值的数值和位置,并且在一些额外约束下,也被证明具有已知的全局最小值。实证研究用于说明,当系数从推荐分布中选取时,景观的崎岖度是可平滑调节的,并且与几种搜索难度度量相关。我们讨论了为什么这些特性使得景观作为具有可调上位性的基准景观模型比景观和沃尔什多项式更具优势。

相似文献

1
Tunably Rugged Landscapes With Known Maximum and Minimum.具有已知最大值和最小值的可调坚固景观。
IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2016 Apr;20(2):263-274. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2015.2454857. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
2
Adaptation in tunably rugged fitness landscapes: the rough Mount Fuji model.可调崎岖适应度景观中的适应:粗糙富士山模型。
Genetics. 2014 Oct;198(2):699-721. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.167668. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
3
Measuring epistasis in fitness landscapes: The correlation of fitness effects of mutations.测量适应度景观中的上位性:突变适应度效应的相关性
J Theor Biol. 2016 May 7;396:132-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.01.037. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
4
Fitness landscapes and evolvability.适应度景观与可进化性
Evol Comput. 2002 Spring;10(1):1-34. doi: 10.1162/106365602317301754.
5
Evolving generalists in switching rugged landscapes.在多变崎岖的环境中进化的通才
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Oct 1;15(10):e1007320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007320. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
Problem Features versus Algorithm Performance on Rugged Multiobjective Combinatorial Fitness Landscapes.崎岖多目标组合适应度景观上的问题特征与算法性能。
Evol Comput. 2017 Winter;25(4):555-585. doi: 10.1162/EVCO_a_00193. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
Coevolution to the edge of chaos: coupled fitness landscapes, poised states, and coevolutionary avalanches.共同进化至混沌边缘:耦合适应度景观、临界状态与共同进化雪崩
J Theor Biol. 1991 Apr 21;149(4):467-505. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80094-3.
8
The NK model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response.崎岖适应度景观的NK模型及其在免疫反应成熟中的应用。
J Theor Biol. 1989 Nov 21;141(2):211-45. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(89)80019-0.
9
Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes.探索性别对经验性适应度景观的影响。
Am Nat. 2009 Jul;174 Suppl 1:S15-30. doi: 10.1086/599081.
10
Effect of Host Species on Topography of the Fitness Landscape for a Plant RNA Virus.宿主物种对植物RNA病毒适合度景观地形的影响。
J Virol. 2016 Oct 28;90(22):10160-10169. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01243-16. Print 2016 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Team Learning for Healthcare Quality Improvement.用于医疗质量改进的团队学习
IEEE Access. 2013 Aug 28;1:545-557. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2280086.
2
Searching the clinical fitness landscape.探索临床适应度景观。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049901. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
3
Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.单中心试验比多中心试验显示出更大的治疗效果:来自荟萃流行病学研究的证据。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):39-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00006.
4
Analysis of a complete DNA-protein affinity landscape.完整 DNA-蛋白质亲和景观分析。
J R Soc Interface. 2010 Mar 6;7(44):397-408. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0193. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
5
The relationship between number of drugs and potential drug-drug interactions in the elderly: a study of over 600,000 elderly patients from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.老年人用药数量与潜在药物相互作用之间的关系:一项来自瑞典处方药登记处的60多万老年患者的研究。
Drug Saf. 2007;30(10):911-8. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730100-00009.
6
The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases.上位性在决定人类常见疾病易感性方面的普遍存在。
Hum Hered. 2003;56(1-3):73-82. doi: 10.1159/000073735.
7
Information characteristics and the structure of landscapes.信息特征与景观结构。
Evol Comput. 2000 Spring;8(1):31-60. doi: 10.1162/106365600568095.
8
The NK model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response.崎岖适应度景观的NK模型及其在免疫反应成熟中的应用。
J Theor Biol. 1989 Nov 21;141(2):211-45. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(89)80019-0.