Reimer Holly, Keller Heather, Tindale Joseph
Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada.
Schlegel Research Chair, Nutrition and Aging, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.
Eur J Ageing. 2011 Dec 8;9(1):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0208-2. eCollection 2012 Mar.
Nutrition risk screening can help identify community-dwelling older adults who may benefit from nutrition education and interventions to improve food intake. Research has shown, however, that older adults who are found "at risk" through nutrition screening commonly do not see themselves at risk, and many do not follow through with accessing recommended nutrition services. Thus, the purpose of this qualitative study was to examine older adults' experiences of learning they were at risk through nutrition screening and to identify what influenced their perspectives and responses to their screening results. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 22 older adults who had screened at risk (SCREEN II scores < 54) through a nutrition screening process conducted by mail. Participants received their screening results in a personalized letter before the interview, along with some recommendations to help improve food intake and decrease their nutrition risk. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes. When participants reflected about receiving their screening results, some described feeling surprised or even upset by the message that they were at increased risk, whereas others felt unconcerned or reacted with heightened attentiveness to their nutrition. They also began to rationalize their screening score and found ways to explain away their risk. The message that they were at increased risk was poorly understood and not well received because it contradicted their perspective: they felt they were doing the right things, they saw room for improvement rather than seeing themselves at risk, and they tended to make comparisons that helped support the view that they were not truly at risk. Further, even though participants saw room for improvement, they described barriers to change and commonly felt that the recommendations were more applicable for others than themselves. Strategies to improve communication of nutrition screening results and recommendations are discussed to help seniors better understand their risk and take steps to improve their nutrition.
营养风险筛查有助于识别那些可能从营养教育和干预措施中受益以改善食物摄入量的社区老年人。然而,研究表明,通过营养筛查被认定为“有风险”的老年人通常并不认为自己有风险,而且许多人并未落实接受推荐的营养服务。因此,这项定性研究的目的是考察老年人通过营养筛查得知自己有风险的经历,并确定是什么影响了他们对筛查结果的看法和反应。通过邮寄方式进行的营养筛查过程,对22名筛查结果为有风险(筛查II评分<54)的老年人进行了面对面访谈。参与者在访谈前收到了一封个性化信件,其中包含他们的筛查结果以及一些有助于改善食物摄入量和降低营养风险的建议。访谈内容被转录并分析主题。当参与者反思收到筛查结果时,一些人表示对自己风险增加的信息感到惊讶甚至不安,而另一些人则漠不关心或对自己的营养状况反应更加关注。他们还开始为自己的筛查分数找理由,并想方设法解释掉自己的风险。他们风险增加的信息理解不佳且不被接受,因为这与他们的观点相矛盾:他们觉得自己做得对,他们看到的是改进的空间而非自己处于风险中,并且他们倾向于进行比较来支持自己并非真正处于风险中的观点。此外,尽管参与者看到了改进的空间,但他们描述了改变的障碍,并且通常觉得这些建议对他人比对自己更适用。本文讨论了改善营养筛查结果和建议沟通的策略,以帮助老年人更好地理解自己的风险并采取措施改善营养状况。