1 University of Auckland, New Zealand.
2 King's College London, UK.
J Health Psychol. 2017 Aug;22(9):1198-1200. doi: 10.1177/1359105317703789. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
The continued critiques of the PACE trial highlight how differing beliefs about the causes of chronic fatigue syndrome still influence how scientific studies in this area are accepted and evaluated. Causal beliefs about chronic fatigue syndrome and a modern version of Cartesian dualism are important in understanding the reaction to the PACE trial. The continued debate on the PACE trial seems to miss the fact that science is incremental. An unfortunate outcome of the PACE controversy and intimidation of researchers may be less research in the area. It is time to move on from criticism and collect more data on effective treatments.
持续对 PACE 试验的批评突显了对慢性疲劳综合征病因的不同看法如何影响人们对该领域科学研究的接受和评估。理解人们对 PACE 试验的反应,需要了解对慢性疲劳综合征的病因的看法和现代版笛卡尔二元论。PACE 试验的持续争议似乎忽略了一个事实,即科学是渐进的。PACE 争议和对研究人员的恐吓的一个不幸结果可能是该领域的研究减少。是时候停止批评,收集更多关于有效治疗方法的数据了。