Suppr超能文献

谁的偏好重要?一种以患者为中心的方法来引出治疗目标。

Whose Preferences Matter? A Patient-Centered Approach for Eliciting Treatment Goals.

机构信息

Five Islands Consulting LLC, Georgetown, ME (NFC, VS, BT, AH).

Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT (AJS).

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):44-55. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17724434. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients facing a high-stakes clinical decision are often confronted with an overwhelming array of options. High-quality decisions about treatment should reflect patients' preferences as well as their clinical characteristics. Preference-assessment instruments typically focus on pre-selected clinical outcomes and attributes chosen by the investigator.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop a patient-centered approach to elicit and compare the treatment goals of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthcare providers (HCPs).

METHODS

We conducted five nominal group technique (NGT) meetings to elicit and prioritize treatment goals from patients and HCPs. Five to nine participants in each group responded silently to one question about their treatment goals. Responses were shared, consolidated, and ranked to develop a prioritized list for each group. The ranked lists were combined. Goals were rated and sorted into categories. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to derive a visual representation, or cognitive map, of the data and to identify conceptual clusters, reflecting how frequently items were sorted into the same category.

RESULTS

Five NGT groups yielded 34 unique patient-generated treatment goals and 31 unique HCP-generated goals. There were differences between patients and HCPs in the goals generated and how they were clustered. Patients' goals tended to focus on the impact of specific symptoms on their day-to-day lives, whereas providers' goals focused on slowing down the course of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences between the treatment goals of patients and HCPs underscore the limitations of using HCP- or investigator-identified goals. This new adaptation of cognitive mapping is a patient-centered approach that can be used to generate and organize the outcomes and attributes for values clarification exercises while minimizing investigator bias and maximizing relevance to patients.

摘要

背景

面临高风险临床决策的患者通常会面临大量的选择。高质量的治疗决策应该反映患者的偏好以及他们的临床特征。偏好评估工具通常侧重于调查员预先选择的临床结果和属性。

目的

我们旨在开发一种以患者为中心的方法来引出和比较多发性硬化症(MS)患者和医疗保健提供者(HCP)的治疗目标。

方法

我们进行了五次名义群体技术(NGT)会议,以从患者和 HCP 中引出和优先考虑治疗目标。每个组有 5 到 9 名参与者,他们对自己的治疗目标回答一个问题。回答被分享、整合和排名,为每个组制定一个优先列表。将排名列表合并。对目标进行评分并分类。多维标度和层次聚类分析用于得出数据的视觉表示或认知图,并确定概念聚类,反映项目分类到同一类别中的频率。

结果

五个 NGT 组产生了 34 个独特的患者生成的治疗目标和 31 个独特的 HCP 生成的目标。在生成的目标以及聚类方式上,患者和 HCP 之间存在差异。患者的目标往往集中在特定症状对日常生活的影响上,而提供者的目标则集中在减缓疾病进展的速度上。

结论

患者和 HCP 治疗目标之间的差异突出了使用 HCP 或调查员确定的目标的局限性。这种认知图的新改编是一种以患者为中心的方法,可用于生成和组织价值观澄清练习的结果和属性,同时最大限度地减少调查员的偏见并最大限度地提高与患者的相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d115/5929460/410fb0cec06f/10.1177_0272989X17724434-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验