• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者来说,在选择治疗方法时最重要的是什么?为共同决策进行对话框架的构建。

What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making.

机构信息

Shared Decision Making Resources, Georgetown, ME and University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States of America.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0270209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270209. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0270209
PMID:35951553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9371337/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend including the patient's values and preferences when choosing treatment for severe aortic stenosis (sAS). However, little is known about what matters most to patients as they develop treatment preferences. Our objective was to identify, prioritize, and organize patient-reported goals and features of treatment for sAS.

METHODS

This multi-center mixed-methods study conducted structured focus groups using the nominal group technique to identify patients' most important treatment goals and features. Patients separately rated and grouped those items using card sorting techniques. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses generated a cognitive map and clusters.

RESULTS

51 adults with sAS and 3 caregivers with experience choosing treatment (age 36-92 years) were included. Participants were referred from multiple health centers across the U.S. and online. Eight nominal group meetings generated 32 unique treatment goals and 46 treatment features, which were grouped into 10 clusters of goals and 11 clusters of features. The most important clusters were: 1) trust in the healthcare team, 2) having good information about options, and 3) long-term outlook. Other clusters addressed the need for and urgency of treatment, being independent and active, overall health, quality of life, family and friends, recovery, homecare, and the process of decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

These patient-reported items addressed the impact of the treatment decision on the lives of patients and their families from the time of decision-making through recovery, homecare, and beyond. Many attributes had not been previously reported for sAS. The goals and features that patients' value, and the relative importance that they attach to them, differ from those reported in clinical trials and vary substantially from one individual to another. These findings are being used to design a shared decision-making tool to help patients and their clinicians choose a treatment that aligns with the patients' priorities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, Trial ID: NCT04755426, Trial URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755426.

摘要

背景

指南建议在为严重主动脉瓣狭窄(sAS)选择治疗方法时纳入患者的价值观和偏好。然而,对于患者在形成治疗偏好时最重要的因素知之甚少。我们的目的是确定、优先排序和组织患者报告的 sAS 治疗目标和特征。

方法

本多中心混合方法研究采用名义小组技术进行了结构化焦点小组,以确定患者最重要的治疗目标和特征。患者分别使用卡片分类技术对这些项目进行评分和分组。多维标度和层次聚类分析生成认知图和聚类。

结果

纳入了 51 名患有 sAS 的成年人和 3 名有治疗选择经验的照顾者(年龄 36-92 岁)。参与者来自美国各地的多个医疗中心和在线。8 次名义小组会议产生了 32 个独特的治疗目标和 46 个治疗特征,这些目标和特征被分为 10 个目标聚类和 11 个特征聚类。最重要的聚类包括:1)对医疗团队的信任,2)有关于治疗选择的信息,3)长期预后。其他聚类涉及治疗的必要性和紧迫性、独立和活跃、整体健康、生活质量、家庭和朋友、康复、家庭护理以及决策过程。

结论

这些患者报告的项目涉及治疗决策对患者及其家庭生活的影响,从决策时到康复、家庭护理以及以后。许多属性以前没有报告过 sAS。患者重视的目标和特征,以及他们对这些目标和特征的重视程度,与临床试验报告的不同,而且个体之间差异很大。这些发现正在被用于设计一个共同决策工具,以帮助患者及其临床医生选择与患者优先事项相一致的治疗方法。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,试验 ID:NCT04755426,试验网址 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755426。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd4/9371337/cd96dd3a98c5/pone.0270209.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd4/9371337/f99afba52274/pone.0270209.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd4/9371337/1a69806cdbc1/pone.0270209.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd4/9371337/cd96dd3a98c5/pone.0270209.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd4/9371337/f99afba52274/pone.0270209.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd4/9371337/1a69806cdbc1/pone.0270209.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbd4/9371337/cd96dd3a98c5/pone.0270209.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making.对于严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者来说,在选择治疗方法时最重要的是什么?为共同决策进行对话框架的构建。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0270209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270209. eCollection 2022.
2
An interactive, online decision aid assessing patient goals and preferences for treatment of aortic stenosis to support physician-led shared decision-making: Early feasibility pilot study.一种交互式在线决策辅助工具,用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗目标和偏好,以支持医生主导的共同决策:早期可行性试点研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0302378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302378. eCollection 2024.
3
Whose Preferences Matter? A Patient-Centered Approach for Eliciting Treatment Goals.谁的偏好重要?一种以患者为中心的方法来引出治疗目标。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):44-55. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17724434. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
Using Mind Mapping in Family Meetings to Support Shared Decision Making with Pediatric and Geriatric Patients.运用思维导图在家庭会议中支持儿科和老年患者的共同决策。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):709-717. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00447-2.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
Improving patient-provider communication about chronic pain: development and feasibility testing of a shared decision-making tool.改善医患双方关于慢性疼痛的沟通:一种共享决策工具的开发和可行性测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 17;20(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01279-8.
7
Patient-defined goals for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a qualitative analysis.患者定义的重度主动脉瓣狭窄治疗目标:一项定性分析
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1036-43. doi: 10.1111/hex.12393. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
8
Professionals' views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis.专业人士对重度主动脉瓣狭窄共同决策的看法。
Heart. 2022 Apr;108(7):558-564. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320194. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
9
Developing a Web-Based Shared Decision-Making Tool for Fertility Preservation Among Reproductive-Age Women With Breast Cancer: An Action Research Approach.开发基于网络的乳腺癌育龄期女性生育力保存决策支持工具:行动研究方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 17;23(3):e24926. doi: 10.2196/24926.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing the Contemporary Multidisciplinary Heart Valve Team: Update on Priorities for Clinicians and Programs.推进当代多学科心脏瓣膜团队建设:临床医生和项目优先事项的最新进展
Struct Heart. 2025 May 12;9(7):100490. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100490. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Patient-Reported Goals in Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient and Care Partner Perspectives.三尖瓣反流患者报告的目标:对患者及护理伙伴观点的定性分析
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 10;4(8):101982. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101982.
3
Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ): Validation in Polish Patients with Aortic Stenosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary Management of Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis.当代严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的处理方法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Nov 30;78(22):2131-2143. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.864.
2
Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Within Major Metropolitan Areas.主要大都市区内经导管主动脉瓣置换术获取机会的种族、民族和社会经济差异。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):150-157. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4641.
3
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
多伦多主动脉瓣狭窄生活质量问卷(TASQ):在波兰主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的验证
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 7;14(7):2502. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072502.
4
Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Younger Patients in the Low-Risk Era.低风险时代年轻患者经导管球囊扩张主动脉瓣置换术的结局
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Feb 1;10(2):127-135. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4237.
5
Expert Panel Perspective: Shared Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Team-Based Cardiovascular Care.专家小组观点:多学科团队心血管护理中的共同决策
JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 3;3(7):100981. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100981. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
An interactive, online decision aid assessing patient goals and preferences for treatment of aortic stenosis to support physician-led shared decision-making: Early feasibility pilot study.一种交互式在线决策辅助工具,用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗目标和偏好,以支持医生主导的共同决策:早期可行性试点研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0302378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302378. eCollection 2024.
7
Medical graphics to improve patient understanding and anxiety in elderly and cognitively impaired patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).医学图形用于改善计划接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的老年和认知障碍患者的理解能力并减轻其焦虑情绪。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Mar;114(3):302-312. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02352-8. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
8
Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model.共同决策和预先医疗照护计划:系统文献回顾与新颖决策模式
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Aug 14;24(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00944-7.
9
What matters most to older adults in skilled nursing facilities.在专业护理机构中,对老年人来说最重要的事情。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1332-1334. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18173. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020.
5
Improving patient-provider communication about chronic pain: development and feasibility testing of a shared decision-making tool.改善医患双方关于慢性疼痛的沟通:一种共享决策工具的开发和可行性测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 17;20(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01279-8.
6
Racial disparities and democratization of health care: A focus on TAVR in the United States.医疗保健中的种族差异与民主化:聚焦美国的经导管主动脉瓣置换术
Am Heart J. 2020 Jun;224:166-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.中度手术风险的重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(2):1-121. eCollection 2020.
8
Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review.老年有症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的共同决策:系统评价。
Heart. 2020 May;106(9):647-655. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316055. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
The Learning Curve for Shared Decision-making in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis.症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的共享决策学习曲线。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):442-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5719.
10
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review.共同决策模型的关键组成部分:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763.