Höner Oliver, Leyhr Daniel, Kelava Augustin
Institute of Sports Science, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0182211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182211. eCollection 2017.
Several talent development programs in youth soccer have implemented motor diagnostics measuring performance factors. However, the predictive value of such tests for adult success is a controversial topic in talent research. This prospective cohort study evaluated the long-term predictive value of 1) motor tests and 2) players' speed abilities (SA) and technical skills (TS) in early adolescence. The sample consisted of 14,178 U12 players from the German talent development program. Five tests (sprint, agility, dribbling, ball control, shooting) were conducted and players' height, weight as well as relative age were assessed at nationwide diagnostics between 2004 and 2006. In the 2014/15 season, the players were then categorized as professional (n = 89), semi-professional (n = 913), or non-professional players (n = 13,176), indicating their adult performance level (APL). The motor tests' prognostic relevance was determined using ANOVAs. Players' future success was predicted by a logistic regression threshold model. This structural equation model comprised a measurement model with the motor tests and two correlated latent factors, SA and TS, with simultaneous consideration for the manifest covariates height, weight and relative age. Each motor predictor and anthropometric characteristic discriminated significantly between the APL (p < .001; η2 ≤ .02). The threshold model significantly predicted the APL (R2 = 24.8%), and in early adolescence the factor TS (p < .001) seems to have a stronger effect on adult performance than SA (p < .05). Both approaches (ANOVA, SEM) verified the diagnostics' predictive validity over a long-term period (≈ 9 years). However, because of the limited effect sizes, the motor tests' prognostic relevance remains ambiguous. A challenge for future research lies in the integration of different (e.g., person-oriented or multilevel) multivariate approaches that expand beyond the "traditional" topic of single tests' predictive validity and toward more theoretically founded issues.
青少年足球的几个人才发展项目已经实施了测量表现因素的运动诊断。然而,此类测试对成年后成功的预测价值在人才研究中是一个有争议的话题。这项前瞻性队列研究评估了1)运动测试以及2)青少年早期球员的速度能力(SA)和技术技能(TS)的长期预测价值。样本包括来自德国人才发展项目的14178名12岁以下球员。在2004年至2006年的全国性诊断中,进行了五项测试(短跑、敏捷性、运球、控球、射门),并评估了球员的身高、体重以及相对年龄。在2014/15赛季,这些球员随后被分类为职业球员(n = 89)、半职业球员(n = 913)或非职业球员(n = 13176),以表明他们的成年表现水平(APL)。使用方差分析确定运动测试的预后相关性。通过逻辑回归阈值模型预测球员未来的成功。这个结构方程模型包括一个测量模型,该模型包含运动测试以及两个相关的潜在因素SA和TS,同时考虑了明显的协变量身高、体重和相对年龄。每个运动预测指标和人体测量特征在APL之间有显著差异(p <.001;η2≤.02)。阈值模型显著预测了APL(R2 = 24.8%),并且在青少年早期,因素TS(p <.001)似乎比SA(p <.05)对成年表现有更强的影响。两种方法(方差分析、结构方程模型)都验证了诊断在长期(约9年)内的预测有效性。然而,由于效应量有限,运动测试的预后相关性仍然不明确。未来研究的一个挑战在于整合不同的(例如,以人为本或多层次)多变量方法,这些方法超越了单一测试预测有效性的“传统”主题,朝着更具理论基础的问题发展。