The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK.
The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:316-332. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
Fertile soil is fundamental to our ability to achieve food security, but problems with soil degradation (such as acidification) are exacerbated by poor management. Consequently, there is a need to better understand management approaches that deliver multiple ecosystem services from agricultural land. There is global interest in sustainable soil management including the re-evaluation of existing management practices. Liming is a long established practice to ameliorate acidic soils and many liming-induced changes are well understood. For instance, short-term liming impacts are detected on soil biota and in soil biological processes (such as in N cycling where liming can increase N availability for plant uptake). The impacts of liming on soil carbon storage are variable and strongly relate to soil type, land use, climate and multiple management factors. Liming influences all elements in soils and as such there are numerous simultaneous changes to soil processes which in turn affect the plant nutrient uptake; two examples of positive impact for crops are increased P availability and decreased uptake of toxic heavy metals. Soil physical conditions are at least maintained or improved by liming, but the time taken to detect change varies significantly. Arable crops differ in their sensitivity to soil pH and for most crops there is a positive yield response. Liming also introduces implications for the development of different crop diseases and liming management is adjusted according to crop type within a given rotation. Repeated lime applications tend to improve grassland biomass production, although grassland response is variable and indirect as it relates to changes in nutrient availability. Other indicators of liming response in grassland are detected in mineral content and herbage quality which have implications for livestock-based production systems. Ecological studies have shown positive impacts of liming on biodiversity; such as increased earthworm abundance that provides habitat for wading birds in upland grasslands. Finally, understanding of liming impacts on soil and crop processes are explored together with functional aspects (in terms of ecosystems services) in a new qualitative framework that includes consideration of how liming impacts change with time. This holistic approach provides insights into the far-reaching impacts that liming has on ecosystems and the potential for liming to enhance the multiple benefits from agriculturally managed land. Recommendations are given for future research on the impact of liming and the implications for ecosystem services.
肥沃的土壤是我们实现粮食安全的基础,但由于管理不善,土壤退化(如酸化)问题更加严重。因此,需要更好地了解从农业土地中提供多种生态系统服务的管理方法。全球都对可持续土壤管理感兴趣,包括重新评估现有的管理做法。石灰处理是一种改良酸性土壤的长期做法,许多石灰处理引起的变化都得到了很好的理解。例如,短期石灰处理会对土壤生物区系和土壤生物过程产生影响(例如在氮循环中,石灰处理可以增加植物吸收的氮的可用性)。石灰处理对土壤碳储存的影响是可变的,并且与土壤类型、土地利用、气候和多种管理因素密切相关。石灰处理会影响土壤中的所有元素,因此会有许多同时发生的土壤过程变化,进而影响植物对养分的吸收;对作物的两个积极影响的例子是增加磷的可用性和减少对有毒重金属的吸收。石灰处理至少可以维持或改善土壤的物理条件,但检测变化所需的时间差异很大。耕地作物对土壤 pH 值的敏感性不同,对于大多数作物,产量都会有正响应。石灰处理还会对不同作物病害的发生产生影响,并且根据给定轮作中的作物类型调整石灰处理管理。重复施用石灰往往会提高草地生物量的产生,尽管草地的反应是可变的,并且是间接的,因为它与养分可用性的变化有关。在草地中还可以检测到与石灰处理响应有关的其他指标,例如矿物质含量和草料质量,这些指标对基于畜牧业的生产系统有影响。生态研究表明,石灰处理对生物多样性有积极影响;例如,蚯蚓数量的增加为高地草地中的涉禽提供了栖息地。最后,在一个新的定性框架中,一起探讨了石灰处理对土壤和作物过程的影响及其功能方面(就生态系统服务而言),其中考虑了石灰处理随时间的变化如何影响。这种整体方法深入了解了石灰处理对生态系统的深远影响,以及石灰处理增强农业管理土地的多种效益的潜力。对石灰处理的影响及其对生态系统服务的影响提出了未来研究的建议。