Instituto Ave Pulmo, Fundación Enfisema, Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Addict Behav. 2018 Jan;76:135-138. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
Models of tobacco smoking behaviour propose that anticipated pleasure or satisfaction, the need to alleviate a nicotine-induced drive state and a stimulus-driven impulse potentially play an important role. This study aimed to provide a preliminary assessment of how far urges to smoke are reported by smokers and whether the strength of such urges prior to a quit attempt predicts short-term success at quitting.
In a prospective study, 566 smokers attending a treatment programme to help smokers quit completed a written questionnaire covering frequency of different types of urge to smoke (automatic impulse - 'automatic urges', anticipated pleasure - 'pleasure urges', and fulfilling a need - 'need urges'). They were asked to rate this for whichever of these urges was dominant for them. The questionnaire also assessed daily cigarette consumption, time to first cigarette of the day, age and gender. Carbon monoxide verified smoking status was recorded at 1 and 4weeks after the target quit date.
A total of 47.9% (271) of smokers reported that automatic urges were dominant, 21.7% (123) reported pleasure urges to be dominant, and 30.4% (172) reported need urges to be dominant. The strength of automatic urges predicted abstinence at both 1week (OR=0.74, p=0.005, 95%CI=0.60-0.92) and 4weeks (OR=0.73, p=0.008, 95%CI=0.59-0.92). Associations between other urge types and abstinence were not statistically significant.
A substantial proportion of smokers attending a clinic for help with quitting report that their dominant urges to smoke occur without any anticipation of pleasure or relief and the strength of the automatic urges predicts failure to sustain abstinence following a quit attempt.
吸烟行为模型提出,预期的快感或满足感、缓解尼古丁引起的驱动状态的需求以及刺激驱动的冲动可能起着重要作用。本研究旨在初步评估吸烟者报告的吸烟冲动程度,以及在戒烟尝试前这种冲动的强烈程度是否能预测短期戒烟的成功。
在一项前瞻性研究中,566 名参加帮助吸烟者戒烟的治疗计划的吸烟者完成了一份书面问卷,涵盖了不同类型吸烟冲动的频率(自动冲动——“自动冲动”、预期的快感——“快感冲动”和满足需求——“需求冲动”)。他们被要求对这些冲动中对他们来说最强烈的一种进行评分。问卷还评估了每日吸烟量、每天第一支烟的时间、年龄和性别。在目标戒烟日期后的 1 周和 4 周,通过一氧化碳验证了吸烟状况。
共有 47.9%(271 人)的吸烟者报告自动冲动占主导地位,21.7%(123 人)报告快感冲动占主导地位,30.4%(172 人)报告需求冲动占主导地位。自动冲动的强烈程度预测了 1 周(OR=0.74,p=0.005,95%CI=0.60-0.92)和 4 周(OR=0.73,p=0.008,95%CI=0.59-0.92)时的戒烟率。其他冲动类型与戒烟之间的关联没有统计学意义。
大量参加戒烟诊所的吸烟者报告说,他们吸烟的主导冲动是在没有任何预期的快感或缓解的情况下发生的,而且自动冲动的强烈程度预测了戒烟尝试后无法维持戒烟状态。