Suppr超能文献

乳糖吸收不良与味觉厌恶学习。

Lactose malabsorption and taste aversion learning.

作者信息

Arthurs Joe, Lin Jian-You, Ocampo Roberto, Reilly Steve

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2017 Oct 15;180:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

Abstract

Consumption of foods can be suppressed by two feeding system defense mechanisms: conditioned taste aversion (CTA) or taste avoidance learning (TAL). There is a debate in the literature about which form of intake suppression is caused by various aversive stimuli. For instance, illness-inducing stimuli like lithium chloride are the gold standard for producing CTA and external (or peripheral) painful stimuli, such as footshock, are the traditional model of TAL. The distinction between CTA and TAL, which have identical effects on intake, is based on differential effects on palatability. That is, CTA involves a decrease in both intake and palatability, whereas TAL suppresses intake without influencing palatability. We evaluated whether lactose, which causes gastrointestinal pain in adult rats, produces CTA or TAL. Using lick pattern analysis to simultaneously measure intake and palatability (i.e., lick cluster size and initial lick rate), we found that pairing saccharin with intragastric infusions of lactose suppressed both the intake and palatability of saccharin. These results support the conclusion that gastrointestinal pain produced by lactose malabsorption produces a CTA, not TAL as had previously been suggested. Furthermore, these findings encourage the view that the CTA mechanism is broadly tuned to defend against the ingestion of foods with aversive post-ingestive effects.

摘要

食物摄入可通过两种进食系统防御机制受到抑制

条件性味觉厌恶(CTA)或味觉回避学习(TAL)。文献中对于各种厌恶刺激会导致哪种形式的摄入抑制存在争议。例如,像氯化锂这样的致疾病刺激是产生CTA的金标准,而外部(或外周)疼痛刺激,如足部电击,是TAL的传统模型。CTA和TAL对摄入量有相同的影响,它们之间的区别基于对适口性的不同影响。也就是说,CTA涉及摄入量和适口性的降低,而TAL在不影响适口性的情况下抑制摄入量。我们评估了在成年大鼠中会引起胃肠道疼痛的乳糖是产生CTA还是TAL。通过舔舐模式分析同时测量摄入量和适口性(即舔舐簇大小和初始舔舐速率),我们发现将糖精与胃内注入乳糖配对会抑制糖精的摄入量和适口性。这些结果支持了以下结论:乳糖吸收不良产生的胃肠道疼痛会产生CTA,而不是如先前所认为的TAL。此外,这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即CTA机制具有广泛的调节作用,以防御摄入具有厌恶后效应的食物。

相似文献

1
Lactose malabsorption and taste aversion learning.
Physiol Behav. 2017 Oct 15;180:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
3
Intra-amygdalar okadaic acid enhances conditioned taste aversion learning and CREB phosphorylation in rats.
Brain Res. 2010 Aug 12;1348:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.06.029. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
4
Reduced palatability in pain-induced conditioned taste aversions.
Physiol Behav. 2013 Jul 2;119:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
6
GABAergic transmission in the rat ventral pallidum mediates a saccharin palatability shift in conditioned taste aversion.
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jul;30(1):110-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06800.x. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
8
Odor of taste stimuli in conditioned "taste" aversion learning.
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Dec;118(6):1400-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.6.1400.
10
Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):433-44. doi: 10.1037/a0027676. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Further characterization of the effect of the prototypical antidepressant imipramine on the microstructure of licking for sucrose.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0245559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245559. eCollection 2021.
2
Daily memantine treatment blunts hedonic response to sucrose in rats.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Jan;237(1):103-114. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05348-3. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
Conditioned taste aversion versus avoidance: A re-examination of the separate processes hypothesis.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0217458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217458. eCollection 2019.
4
The Functional and Neurobiological Properties of Bad Taste.
Physiol Rev. 2019 Jan 1;99(1):605-663. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00044.2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Anesthesia-inducing drugs also induce conditioned taste aversions.
Physiol Behav. 2017 Aug 1;177:247-251. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Flavors paired with internal pain or with nausea elicit divergent types of hedonic responses.
Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun;131(3):235-248. doi: 10.1037/bne0000197. Epub 2017 May 4.
3
Conditioned taste aversions: From poisons to pain to drugs of abuse.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):335-351. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1092-8.
4
Lactose Intolerance in Adults: Biological Mechanism and Dietary Management.
Nutrients. 2015 Sep 18;7(9):8020-35. doi: 10.3390/nu7095380.
5
Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:28-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
6
Reduced palatability in pain-induced conditioned taste aversions.
Physiol Behav. 2013 Jul 2;119:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
Role of the gustatory thalamus in taste learning.
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Aug 1;250:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.039. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
8
Ghrelin increases the motivation to eat, but does not alter food palatability.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012 Aug 1;303(3):R259-69. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00488.2011. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: I. Variations in the initial value of the conditioned stimulus.
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):423-32. doi: 10.1037/a0027674. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
10
Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):433-44. doi: 10.1037/a0027676. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验