• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳糖吸收不良与味觉厌恶学习。

Lactose malabsorption and taste aversion learning.

作者信息

Arthurs Joe, Lin Jian-You, Ocampo Roberto, Reilly Steve

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2017 Oct 15;180:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.005
PMID:28807538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5597491/
Abstract

Consumption of foods can be suppressed by two feeding system defense mechanisms: conditioned taste aversion (CTA) or taste avoidance learning (TAL). There is a debate in the literature about which form of intake suppression is caused by various aversive stimuli. For instance, illness-inducing stimuli like lithium chloride are the gold standard for producing CTA and external (or peripheral) painful stimuli, such as footshock, are the traditional model of TAL. The distinction between CTA and TAL, which have identical effects on intake, is based on differential effects on palatability. That is, CTA involves a decrease in both intake and palatability, whereas TAL suppresses intake without influencing palatability. We evaluated whether lactose, which causes gastrointestinal pain in adult rats, produces CTA or TAL. Using lick pattern analysis to simultaneously measure intake and palatability (i.e., lick cluster size and initial lick rate), we found that pairing saccharin with intragastric infusions of lactose suppressed both the intake and palatability of saccharin. These results support the conclusion that gastrointestinal pain produced by lactose malabsorption produces a CTA, not TAL as had previously been suggested. Furthermore, these findings encourage the view that the CTA mechanism is broadly tuned to defend against the ingestion of foods with aversive post-ingestive effects.

摘要

食物摄入可通过两种进食系统防御机制受到抑制

条件性味觉厌恶(CTA)或味觉回避学习(TAL)。文献中对于各种厌恶刺激会导致哪种形式的摄入抑制存在争议。例如,像氯化锂这样的致疾病刺激是产生CTA的金标准,而外部(或外周)疼痛刺激,如足部电击,是TAL的传统模型。CTA和TAL对摄入量有相同的影响,它们之间的区别基于对适口性的不同影响。也就是说,CTA涉及摄入量和适口性的降低,而TAL在不影响适口性的情况下抑制摄入量。我们评估了在成年大鼠中会引起胃肠道疼痛的乳糖是产生CTA还是TAL。通过舔舐模式分析同时测量摄入量和适口性(即舔舐簇大小和初始舔舐速率),我们发现将糖精与胃内注入乳糖配对会抑制糖精的摄入量和适口性。这些结果支持了以下结论:乳糖吸收不良产生的胃肠道疼痛会产生CTA,而不是如先前所认为的TAL。此外,这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即CTA机制具有广泛的调节作用,以防御摄入具有厌恶后效应的食物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/5597491/7fb30399e24b/nihms900733f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/5597491/a0840d22dc73/nihms900733f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/5597491/7fb30399e24b/nihms900733f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/5597491/a0840d22dc73/nihms900733f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/5597491/7fb30399e24b/nihms900733f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Lactose malabsorption and taste aversion learning.乳糖吸收不良与味觉厌恶学习。
Physiol Behav. 2017 Oct 15;180:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
2
Reduced palatability in lithium- and activity-based, but not in amphetamine-based, taste aversion learning.在基于锂和活动的味觉厌恶学习中适口性降低,但在基于苯丙胺的味觉厌恶学习中则不然。
Behav Neurosci. 2008 Oct;122(5):1051-60. doi: 10.1037/a0012703.
3
Intra-amygdalar okadaic acid enhances conditioned taste aversion learning and CREB phosphorylation in rats.杏仁核内涂抹冈田酸增强大鼠条件性味觉厌恶学习和 CREB 磷酸化。
Brain Res. 2010 Aug 12;1348:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.06.029. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
4
Reduced palatability in pain-induced conditioned taste aversions.疼痛诱导的条件味觉厌恶反应中味觉适口性降低。
Physiol Behav. 2013 Jul 2;119:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
Comparing immune activation (lipopolysaccharide) and toxin (lithium chloride)-induced gustatory conditioning: lipopolysaccharide produces conditioned taste avoidance but not aversion.比较免疫激活(脂多糖)和毒素(氯化锂)诱导的味觉条件反射:脂多糖产生条件性味觉回避而非厌恶。
Behav Brain Res. 2004 Jan 5;148(1-2):11-9. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00181-5.
6
GABAergic transmission in the rat ventral pallidum mediates a saccharin palatability shift in conditioned taste aversion.大鼠腹侧苍白球中的γ-氨基丁酸能传递介导了条件性味觉厌恶中糖精适口性的转变。
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jul;30(1):110-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06800.x. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
7
Fourth ventricular CART reduces food and water intake and produces a conditioned taste aversion in rats.
Behav Neurosci. 2002 Oct;116(5):918-21.
8
Odor of taste stimuli in conditioned "taste" aversion learning.条件性“味觉”厌恶学习中味觉刺激的气味
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Dec;118(6):1400-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.6.1400.
9
Activation of mu-opioid receptors in the ventral pallidum decreases the negative hedonic evaluation of a conditioned aversive taste in rats.腹侧苍白球中μ-阿片受体的激活降低了大鼠对条件性厌恶性味觉的负性享乐评价。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.10.051. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
10
Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.药物诱导性味觉厌恶中的适口性降低:II. 厌恶和奖赏性非条件刺激
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):433-44. doi: 10.1037/a0027676. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Further characterization of the effect of the prototypical antidepressant imipramine on the microstructure of licking for sucrose.进一步描述典型抗抑郁药丙咪嗪对蔗糖舔吸行为微观结构的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0245559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245559. eCollection 2021.
2
Daily memantine treatment blunts hedonic response to sucrose in rats.每日美金刚治疗可削弱大鼠蔗糖快感反应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Jan;237(1):103-114. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05348-3. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
Conditioned taste aversion versus avoidance: A re-examination of the separate processes hypothesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Anesthesia-inducing drugs also induce conditioned taste aversions.麻醉诱导药物也会引起条件性味觉厌恶。
Physiol Behav. 2017 Aug 1;177:247-251. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Flavors paired with internal pain or with nausea elicit divergent types of hedonic responses.与体内疼痛或恶心感搭配的味道会引发不同类型的享乐反应。
Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun;131(3):235-248. doi: 10.1037/bne0000197. Epub 2017 May 4.
3
Conditioned taste aversions: From poisons to pain to drugs of abuse.条件性味觉厌恶:从毒药到疼痛再到滥用药物。
条件性味觉厌恶与回避:对分离过程假设的再检验。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0217458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217458. eCollection 2019.
4
The Functional and Neurobiological Properties of Bad Taste.不良味道的功能和神经生物学特性。
Physiol Rev. 2019 Jan 1;99(1):605-663. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00044.2017.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):335-351. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1092-8.
4
Lactose Intolerance in Adults: Biological Mechanism and Dietary Management.成人乳糖不耐受:生物学机制与饮食管理
Nutrients. 2015 Sep 18;7(9):8020-35. doi: 10.3390/nu7095380.
5
Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability.条件性味觉厌恶、成瘾性药物与适口性
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:28-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
6
Reduced palatability in pain-induced conditioned taste aversions.疼痛诱导的条件味觉厌恶反应中味觉适口性降低。
Physiol Behav. 2013 Jul 2;119:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
Role of the gustatory thalamus in taste learning.味觉丘脑在味觉学习中的作用。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Aug 1;250:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.039. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
8
Ghrelin increases the motivation to eat, but does not alter food palatability.生长激素释放肽可增加进食动机,但不会改变食物的美味度。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012 Aug 1;303(3):R259-69. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00488.2011. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: I. Variations in the initial value of the conditioned stimulus.药物诱导性味觉厌恶中的适口性降低:I. 条件刺激初始值的变化
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):423-32. doi: 10.1037/a0027674. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
10
Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.药物诱导性味觉厌恶中的适口性降低:II. 厌恶和奖赏性非条件刺激
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):433-44. doi: 10.1037/a0027676. Epub 2012 Mar 12.