Kanchustambham Venkatkiran, Saladi Swetha, Rodrigues Jonathan, Fernandes Hermina, Patolia Setu, Santosh Sadhashiv
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Allergy and Immunology, Sanford Health, Bismarck, ND, USA.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2017 Jul 13;7(3):144-150. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2017.1343076. eCollection 2017 Jul.
: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are battery-powered devices that deliver aerosolized nicotine. With easy access and over-the-counter availability, many patients consider using electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Few studies have looked at long-term safety/efficacy and physician knowledge/attitudes toward e-cigarettes. Physicians have insufficient guidelines for advising their patients about e-cigarettes. : 1) To identify knowledge and attitude of health care practitioners toward electronic cigarettes. 2) To identify the effect of level of training, experience and speciality on knowledge and practice of electronic cigarettes. 3) To identify factors influencing electronic cigarettes advise/prescribing practice. : An anonymous online questionnaire was sent to residents, fellows, and faculty in pre-selected specialties at Saint Louis University (SLU) Hospital. : We received 115 responses. Nine percent reported being 'very familiar' with e-cigarettes, while 25% reported no familiarity; 18% of physicians would advise e-cigarettes as nicotine-replacement therapy if asked by patients; 91% were aware of the nicotine content of e-cigarettes, but only 20% and 39%, respectively, were aware of the presence of carcinogens and polyethylene glycol. Only 63% of respondents knew what 'vape' meant. Lack of evidence regarding long-term safety (76%), e-cigarettes as starter products for nonsmokers (50%), absence of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations (51%) and marketing to youth (42%) were major concerns. Stricter regulations (54%), warning labels similar to tobacco products (53%), restricting advertising (36%), banning sales to minors (34%), and banning use in public spaces (25%) were favored as regulatory measures. More than 50% of physicians see a role for e-cigarettes as part of 'harm-reduction strategy'. : Further research is needed to assess whether e- cigarettes could be an effective smoking-cessation tool. There is an apparent knowledge deficit among physicians and an urgent need for evidence-based guidelines to aid with advising patients enquiring about e-cigarettes.
电子烟是由电池供电的设备,可输送雾化尼古丁。由于易于获取且可在柜台购买,许多患者考虑使用电子烟来戒烟。很少有研究关注其长期安全性/有效性以及医生对电子烟的了解/态度。医生在为患者提供有关电子烟的建议时缺乏足够的指导方针。:1)确定医疗从业者对电子烟的了解和态度。2)确定培训水平、经验和专业对电子烟知识和实践的影响。3)确定影响电子烟建议/开处方实践的因素。:向圣路易斯大学(SLU)医院预先选定专业的住院医师、研究员和教职员工发送了一份匿名在线问卷。:我们收到了115份回复。9%的人表示对电子烟“非常熟悉”,而25%的人表示不熟悉;如果患者询问,18%的医生会建议将电子烟作为尼古丁替代疗法;91%的人知道电子烟的尼古丁含量,但分别只有20%和39%的人知道其中存在致癌物和聚乙二醇。只有63%的受访者知道“vape”是什么意思。缺乏关于长期安全性的证据(76%)、电子烟作为非吸烟者的入门产品(50%)、食品药品监督管理局(FDA)缺乏相关规定(51%)以及针对青少年的营销(42%)是主要担忧。更严格的规定(54%)、类似于烟草产品的警告标签(53%)、限制广告(36%)、禁止向未成年人销售(34%)以及禁止在公共场所使用(25%)被视为有利的监管措施。超过50%的医生认为电子烟可作为“减少危害策略”的一部分发挥作用。:需要进一步研究以评估电子烟是否可能是一种有效的戒烟工具。医生中存在明显的知识欠缺,迫切需要基于证据的指导方针来帮助为询问电子烟的患者提供建议。