Department of General, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Am J Surg. 2018 Apr;215(4):719-726. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.032. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
The component separation technique (CST) has gained popularity among general surgeons in the management of giant abdominal hernia. A systematic review of the MedLine and EMBASE databases was performed. 36 observational cohort studies were included for data-analysis and divided in 4 main groups: Open Anterior Approach (OAA), Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR), Laparoscopic Anterior Approach (LAA) and Perforator Preserving Approach (PPA). Surgical Site Occurrences (SSO) occurred in 21.4%, 23.7%, 20.3% and 16.0% respectively. Incidence of recurrence was 11.9% (OAA), 5.25% (TAR), 7.02% (LAA) and 6.47% (PPA) with a significant difference in the advantage of TAR over OAA (p < 0.001). Limitations in this systematic review were a lack of randomized trials, a heterogenous population and non-standardized methods for measuring outcomes, all making it difficult to postulate conclusions about CST and its modifications. Based on pooled results of 36 studies, the prevalence of SSO is comparable between the techniques with an average of one in five and the prevalence of recurrences is highest when using the Open Anterior Approach at 11.9%.
组件分离技术 (CST) 在巨型腹壁疝的治疗中受到普通外科医生的欢迎。对 MedLine 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了系统评价。纳入了 36 项观察性队列研究进行数据分析,并分为 4 个主要组:开放式前入路 (OAA)、腹直肌释放术 (TAR)、腹腔镜前入路 (LAA) 和穿支保留入路 (PPA)。手术部位发生 (SSO) 分别为 21.4%、23.7%、20.3%和 16.0%。复发率分别为 11.9% (OAA)、5.25% (TAR)、7.02% (LAA)和 6.47% (PPA),TAR 明显优于 OAA (p<0.001)。本系统评价的局限性在于缺乏随机试验、人群异质性和用于测量结果的非标准化方法,所有这些都使得难以对 CST 及其改良术式得出结论。基于 36 项研究的汇总结果,SSO 在这些技术之间的发生率相当,平均五分之一,而使用开放式前入路时复发率最高,为 11.9%。