Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Jingmen Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital (Jingmen Shihua Hospital), Jingmen 448000, China.
Department of Endocrinology, Jingmen Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital (Jingmen Shihua Hospital), Jingmen 448000, China.
Biosci Rep. 2017 Sep 7;37(5). doi: 10.1042/BSR20170947. Print 2017 Oct 31.
Studies on elevated fasting insulin or insulin resistance (IR) and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality risk in non-diabetic individuals have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association of elevated fasting insulin levels or IR as defined by homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in non-diabetic adults. We searched for relevant studies in PubMed and Emabse databases until November 2016. Only prospective observational studies investigating the association of elevated fasting insulin levels or HOMA-IR with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality risk in non-diabetic adults were included. Risk ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was pooled for the highest compared with the lowest category of fasting insulin levels or HOMA-IR. Seven articles involving 26976 non-diabetic adults were included. The pooled, adjusted RR of all-cause mortality comparing the highest with the lowest category was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.00-1.27; =0.058) for fasting insulin levels and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.11-1.62; =0.002) for HOMA-IR, respectively. When comparing the highest with the lowest category, the pooled adjusted RR of cardiovascular mortality was 2.11 (95% CI: 1.01-4.41; =0.048) for HOMA-IR in two studies and 1.40 (95% CI: 0.49-3.96; =0.526) for fasting insulin levels in one study. IR as measured by HOMA-IR but not fasting insulin appears to be independently associated with greater risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in non-diabetic adults. However, the association of fasting insulin and HOMA-IR with cardiovascular mortality may be unreliable due to the small number of articles included.
在非糖尿病个体中,关于空腹胰岛素升高或胰岛素抵抗(IR)与心血管或全因死亡率风险的研究结果存在矛盾。本荟萃分析旨在评估稳态模型评估的 IR(HOMA-IR)定义的空腹胰岛素水平或 IR 升高与非糖尿病成年人心血管或全因死亡率的相关性。我们在 PubMed 和 Emabse 数据库中搜索了相关研究,截止日期为 2016 年 11 月。仅纳入了前瞻性观察性研究,这些研究调查了非糖尿病成年人空腹胰岛素水平或 HOMA-IR 升高与心血管或全因死亡率风险的相关性。最高与最低空腹胰岛素水平或 HOMA-IR 类别相比,风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)进行了汇总。纳入了 7 项涉及 26976 例非糖尿病成年人的研究。与最低类别相比,最高类别空腹胰岛素水平的全因死亡率的合并、调整 RR 为 1.13(95%CI:1.00-1.27;=0.058),HOMA-IR 的 RR 为 1.34(95%CI:1.11-1.62;=0.002)。与最低类别相比,两项研究中 HOMA-IR 最高与最低类别相比的心血管死亡率的合并、调整 RR 为 2.11(95%CI:1.01-4.41;=0.048),一项研究中空腹胰岛素水平的 RR 为 1.40(95%CI:0.49-3.96;=0.526)。HOMA-IR 测定的 IR 而不是空腹胰岛素似乎与非糖尿病成年人的心血管或全因死亡率风险增加独立相关。然而,由于纳入的文章数量较少,空腹胰岛素和 HOMA-IR 与心血管死亡率的相关性可能不可靠。