Suppr超能文献

血脂稳定性对颈动脉粥样硬化进展的影响。

Effects of blood lipid stability on progression of carotid atherosclerosis.

作者信息

Ding Yu, Li Bo, Tian Feng, Zhou Shanshan, Chen Yundai

机构信息

Yu Ding, Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

Bo Li, Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2017 May-Jun;33(3):599-602. doi: 10.12669/pjms.333.12593.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of blood lipid stability on progression of carotid atherosclerosis.

METHODS

A total of 416 patients who had physical examination in our hospital annually from January 2010 to December 2015 were selected and divided into a progression group (n=216) and a non-progression group (n=200) according to the intima-media thickness measured by carotid ultrasound. The levels of lipid-related parameters within five years were retrospectively analyzed to calculate the smoothness index (SI = x±/s).

RESULTS

The cross-sectional TG, HDL-C, ApoAI, ApoB, ApoE and Lpa levels were similar in the two groups (p>0.05). The non-progression group had significantly higher TC ((4.15±0.82 vs. 4.50±1.04) mmol/L) and LDL-C ((2.53±0.76 vs. 2.99±1.03) mmol/L) levels than those of the progression group (p<0.05). The progression group had significantly lower TC SI (5.29±1.28 vs. 5.65±1.76), TG SI (2.13±0.71 vs. 2.79±0.82), LDL-C SI (3.66±1.17 vs. 4.36±1.58), ApoB SI (3.37±0.88 vs. 3.62±0.95) and Lpa SI (1.53±0.49 vs. 1.62±0.43) than those of the non-progression group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with cross-sectional results, SI was better correlated with the progression of atherosclerosis. The progression group had lower SI values.

摘要

目的

评估血脂稳定性对颈动脉粥样硬化进展的影响。

方法

选取2010年1月至2015年12月期间每年在我院进行体检的416例患者,根据颈动脉超声测量的内膜中层厚度分为进展组(n = 216)和非进展组(n = 200)。回顾性分析五年内血脂相关参数水平,计算平滑指数(SI = x±/s)。

结果

两组的横断面甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、载脂蛋白AI(ApoAI)、载脂蛋白B(ApoB)、载脂蛋白E(ApoE)和脂蛋白a(Lpa)水平相似(p>0.05)。非进展组的总胆固醇(TC)((4.15±0.82 vs. 4.50±1.04)mmol/L)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)((2.53±0.76 vs. 2.99±1.03)mmol/L)水平显著高于进展组(p<0.05)。进展组的TC平滑指数(SI)(5.29±1.28 vs. 5.65±1.76)、TG平滑指数(2.13±0.71 vs. 2.79±0.82)、LDL-C平滑指数(3.66±1.17 vs. 4.36±1.58)、ApoB平滑指数(3.37±0.88 vs. 3.62±0.95)和Lpa平滑指数(1.53±0.49 vs. 1.62±0.43)显著低于非进展组(p<0.05)。

结论

与横断面结果相比,SI与动脉粥样硬化进展的相关性更好。进展组的SI值较低。

相似文献

7
Variance of Serum Lipid Levels in Stroke Subtypes.中风亚型中血脂水平的方差
Clin Lab. 2015;61(10):1509-14. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2015.150118.

本文引用的文献

3
Lp(a) and cardiovascular risk: Investigating the hidden side of the moon.脂蛋白(a)与心血管风险:探索未知的一面。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Nov;26(11):980-986. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验