Schneeweiss Sven, Esser Michael, Thaiss Wolfgang, Boesmueller Hans, Ditt Hendrik, Nikolau Konstantin, Horger Marius
Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
Acta Radiol Open. 2017 Jul 10;6(7):2058460117718224. doi: 10.1177/2058460117718224. eCollection 2017 Jul.
Computed tomography (CT) as a fast and reliable diagnostic technique is the imaging modality of choice for acute bowel ischemia. However, diagnostic is often difficult mainly due to low attenuation differences between ischemic and perfused segments.
To compare the diagnostic efficacy of a new post-processing tool based on frequency selective non-linear blending with that of conventional linear contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) image blending for the detection of bowel ischemia.
Twenty-seven consecutive patients (19 women; mean age = 73.7 years, age range = 50-94 years) with acute bowel ischemia were scanned using multidetector CT (120 kV; 100-200 mAs). Pre-contrast and portal venous scans (65-70 s delay) were acquired. All patients underwent surgery for acute bowel ischemia and intraoperative diagnosis as well as histologic evaluation of explanted bowel segments was considered "gold standard." First, two radiologists read the conventional CECT images in which linear blending was adapted for optimal contrast, and second (three weeks later) the frequency selective non-linear blending (F-NLB) image. Attenuation values were compared, both in the involved and non-involved bowel segments creating ratios between unenhanced and CECT.
The mean attenuation difference between ischemic and non-ischemic wall in the portal venous scan was 69.54 HU (reader 2 = 69.01 HU) higher for F-NLB compared with conventional CECT. Also, the attenuation ratio between contrast-enhanced and pre-contrast CT data for the non-ischemic walls showed significantly higher values for the F-NLB image (CECT: reader 1 = 2.11 (reader 2 = 3.36), F-NLB: reader 1 = 4.46 (reader 2 = 4.98)]. Sensitivity in detecting ischemic areas increased significantly for both readers using F-NLB (CECT: reader 1/2 = 53%/65% versus F-NLB: reader 1/2 = 62%/75%).
Frequency selective non-linear blending improves detection of bowel ischemia compared with conventional CECT by increasing attenuation differences between ischemic and perfused segments.
计算机断层扫描(CT)作为一种快速可靠的诊断技术,是急性肠缺血的首选成像方式。然而,诊断往往很困难,主要是因为缺血段和灌注段之间的衰减差异较小。
比较基于频率选择性非线性融合的新型后处理工具与传统线性对比增强CT(CECT)图像融合在检测肠缺血方面的诊断效能。
对27例连续的急性肠缺血患者(19名女性;平均年龄73.7岁,年龄范围50 - 94岁)进行多排CT扫描(120 kV;100 - 200 mAs)。采集平扫和门静脉期扫描(延迟65 - 70秒)。所有患者均接受了急性肠缺血手术,术中诊断以及切除肠段的组织学评估被视为“金标准”。首先,两名放射科医生阅读传统的CECT图像,其中采用线性融合以优化对比度,其次(三周后)阅读频率选择性非线性融合(F-NLB)图像。比较受累和未受累肠段的衰减值,计算平扫和CECT之间的比值。
与传统CECT相比,门静脉期扫描中缺血壁和非缺血壁之间的平均衰减差异,F-NLB更高,为69.54 HU(读者2为69.01 HU)。此外,非缺血壁的对比增强CT数据和平扫CT数据之间的衰减比值,F-NLB图像显示出显著更高的值(CECT:读者1为2.11(读者2为3.36),F-NLB:读者1为4.46(读者2为4.98)]。使用F-NLB时,两名读者检测缺血区域的敏感性均显著提高(CECT:读者1/2为53%/65%,而F-NLB:读者1/2为62%/75%)。
与传统CECT相比,频率选择性非线性融合通过增加缺血段和灌注段之间的衰减差异,提高了肠缺血的检测能力。