• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年选民的新维度:选民为何投票给养老金领取者政党?以荷兰为例。

Old Voters on New Dimensions: Why Do Voters Vote for Pensioners' Parties? The Case of the Netherlands.

机构信息

a Researcher, Documentation Center, Dutch Political Parties , University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands.

b Associate Professor, Department of Communication Science , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-47. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1363589. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2017.1363589
PMID:28812440
Abstract

This article analyzes the electoral support of the Dutch pensioners' party 50Plus. Due to its open electoral system and aging population, the Netherlands is a key case to study pensioners' parties. Our study shows that this pensioners' party appeals to voters who are characterized by their age and their dependence on the welfare state as well as their policy positions on new lines of political conflict. In particular, their position on the new economic dimension (which concerns welfare state reform) and the new cultural dimension (which concerns immigration and EU integration) is distinct. Moreover, even when the majority of voters for this new party once supported the larger mainstream parties, they are now dissatisfied with the established politics. With rapidly aging populations across established democracies, this study is not just relevant for those studying pensioners' parties, but rather gives an important insight into the electoral dynamics and popular support for mainstream politics, the welfare state, and social security.

摘要

本文分析了荷兰养老金领取者政党 50Plus 的选举支持率。由于其开放的选举制度和人口老龄化,荷兰是研究养老金领取者政党的关键案例。我们的研究表明,这个养老金领取者政党吸引了那些以年龄、对福利国家的依赖以及在新的政治冲突线上的政策立场为特征的选民。特别是,他们在新的经济维度(涉及福利国家改革)和新的文化维度(涉及移民和欧盟一体化)上的立场是鲜明的。此外,即使这个新政党的大多数选民曾经支持更大的主流政党,他们现在也对既定政治感到不满。随着发达民主国家人口的迅速老龄化,这项研究不仅与研究养老金领取者政党的人有关,而且为主流政治、福利国家和社会保障的选举动态和民众支持提供了重要的见解。

相似文献

1
Old Voters on New Dimensions: Why Do Voters Vote for Pensioners' Parties? The Case of the Netherlands.老年选民的新维度:选民为何投票给养老金领取者政党?以荷兰为例。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-47. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1363589. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
2
Pensioners' political parties in Israel.以色列的退休人员政党。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;12(3):87-107. doi: 10.1300/J031v12n03_05.
3
The politics of welfare privatization: the British experience.福利私有化的政治:英国的经验
Int J Health Serv. 1989;19(2):209-20. doi: 10.2190/NGX2-3YK9-CRKU-P4T3.
4
Competing for the same value segments? Insight into the volatile Dutch political landscape.争夺相同的价值细分市场?洞察动荡的荷兰政治格局。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190598. eCollection 2018.
5
Immigration politics Italian style: the paradoxical behaviour of mainstream and populist parties.意大利式移民政治:主流政党与民粹主义政党的矛盾行为
South Eur Soc Polit. 1996 Autumn;1(2):229-52. doi: 10.1080/13608749608539473.
6
Governator vs. Hunter and Aggregator: A simulation of party competition with vote-seeking and office-seeking rules.州长对决猎人与聚合者:基于逐票规则和逐职规则的政党竞争模拟
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0191649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191649. eCollection 2018.
7
If they were to vote, they would vote for us.如果他们要投票,他们会投给我们。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Dec;22(12):1506-10. doi: 10.1177/0956797611420164. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
8
Distinguishing welfare state reform and income redistribution. A two-dimensional approach to the Dutch voter space on economic issues.区分福利国家改革与收入再分配。关于经济问题的荷兰选民空间的二维方法。
Party Politics. 2018 Sep;24(5):563-576. doi: 10.1177/1354068816663039. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
9
Group Appeals of Parties in Times of Economic and Identity Conflicts and Realignment.经济与身份冲突及重组时期政党的群体诉求
Polit Stud (Oxf). 2024 May;72(2):463-485. doi: 10.1177/00323217221123147. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
10
Left-Right Orientation and Electoral Choices: Divergences in the Relationships With Authority and Out-Groups.左右取向与选举选择:与权威和外群体关系中的差异
Psychol Rep. 2018 Dec;121(6):1131-1146. doi: 10.1177/0033294117742656. Epub 2017 Nov 21.