Central South University, P.R. China.
Yale University, USA.
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):798-808. doi: 10.1177/0969733017720848. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
In China, research ethics is a subject of increasingly formal regulation. However, little is known about how nursing researchers understand the concept of research ethics and the ways in which they can maintain ethical standards in their work.
The aim of this study is to examine nursing researchers' perspectives on research ethics in China.
We conducted a descriptive qualitative study. Qualitative research methods enabled us to gain an in-depth understanding of nursing researchers' views on research ethics.
We carefully selected and extensively interviewed 28 nursing researchers, nursing faculty, and clinical nurses who had been involved in research or who may undertake research in the future. We collected data between October 2014 and March 2015.
This study was approved by the institutional review boards of Yale University and Central South University.
We grouped the data into five categories based on the interviewees' responses: (1) perceptions of ethics, bioethics, and research ethics; (2) perception of the ethics review process; (3) perception of the function of institutional review boards; (4) the need for comprehensive ethical guidelines for future studies; and (5) ethical challenges faced by the interviewees.
This study contributes new insights into nursing researchers' views on research ethics in China and finds considerable shortcomings in researchers' understanding and implementation of ethical principles. Intensive educational efforts are needed to provide nursing researchers, institutional review board members, and even study subjects with accurate and up-to-date information and guidance on research ethics. In addition, while Western research ethics theoretically have guided Chinese clinical research for several years, the ways in which nursing researchers have implemented these ethical standards highlight the differences between the Eastern and Western ethical paradigms. This finding suggests the need for ethical standards that are more tailored to the Chinese context.
在中国,研究伦理已受到越来越多的规范监管。然而,对于护理研究人员如何理解研究伦理的概念以及如何在工作中保持伦理标准,人们知之甚少。
本研究旨在探讨中国护理研究人员对研究伦理的看法。
我们进行了一项描述性的定性研究。定性研究方法使我们能够深入了解护理研究人员对研究伦理的看法。
我们精心挑选并对 28 名护理研究人员、护理教师和临床护士进行了广泛访谈,这些人或参与过研究,或将来可能从事研究。我们于 2014 年 10 月至 2015 年 3 月期间收集数据。
本研究得到了耶鲁大学和中南大学机构审查委员会的批准。
我们根据受访者的回答将数据分为五类:(1)对伦理、生命伦理学和研究伦理的看法;(2)对伦理审查过程的看法;(3)对机构审查委员会功能的看法;(4)对未来研究综合伦理准则的需求;(5)受访者面临的伦理挑战。
本研究深入了解了中国护理研究人员对研究伦理的看法,并发现研究人员在理解和实施伦理原则方面存在相当大的不足。需要加强教育,为护理研究人员、机构审查委员会成员,甚至研究对象提供关于研究伦理的准确和最新信息和指导。此外,虽然西方研究伦理理论上已经指导了中国的临床研究多年,但护理研究人员实施这些伦理标准的方式突显了东西方伦理范式之间的差异。这一发现表明,需要制定更符合中国国情的伦理标准。