研究人员对道德准则和行为规范的看法。
Researcher perceptions of ethical guidelines and codes of conduct.
作者信息
Giorgini Vincent, Mecca Jensen T, Gibson Carter, Medeiros Kelsey, Mumford Michael D, Connelly Shane, Devenport Lynn D
机构信息
a Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.
出版信息
Account Res. 2015;22(3):123-38. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.955607.
Abstract
Ethical codes of conduct exist in almost every profession. Field-specific codes of conduct have been around for decades, each articulating specific ethical and professional guidelines. However, there has been little empirical research on researchers' perceptions of these codes of conduct. In the present study, we interviewed faculty members in six research disciplines and identified five themes bearing on the circumstances under which they use ethical guidelines and the underlying reasons for not adhering to such guidelines. We then identify problems with the manner in which codes of conduct in academia are constructed and offer solutions for overcoming these problems.
摘要
几乎每个行业都有道德行为准则。特定领域的行为准则已经存在了几十年，每一个都阐述了具体的道德和专业准则。然而，关于研究人员对这些行为准则的看法，实证研究却很少。在本研究中，我们采访了六个研究学科的教员，确定了五个主题，这些主题涉及他们使用道德准则的情况以及不遵守这些准则的潜在原因。然后，我们找出学术界行为准则构建方式存在的问题，并提出克服这些问题的解决方案。
相似文献
1
Researcher perceptions of ethical guidelines and codes of conduct.研究人员对道德准则和行为规范的看法。
Account Res. 2015;22(3):123-38. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.955607.
2
A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work.一种评估科研工作中道德行为的新方法。
Account Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;10(4):205-28. doi: 10.1080/714906104.
3
An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity.系统伦理：与科学家谈研究诚信。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1235-1253. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0064-y. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
4
Shifts in guidelines for ethical scientific conduct: how public and private organizations create and change norms of research integrity.伦理科学行为准则的转变：公共和私人组织如何创建和改变研究诚信规范。
Soc Stud Sci. 2009 Feb;39(1):137-55. doi: 10.1177/0306312708097659.
5
Research Integrity and Research Ethics in Professional Codes of Ethics: Survey of Terminology Used by Professional Organizations across Research Disciplines.职业道德准则中的研究诚信与研究伦理：跨研究学科的专业组织使用术语调查
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0133662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133662. eCollection 2015.
6
Nurse researchers' perspectives on research ethics in China.护士研究人员对中国研究伦理的看法。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):798-808. doi: 10.1177/0969733017720848. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
7
Recognition could support a science code of conduct.认可有助于形成科学行为准则。
Nature. 2007 May 17;447(7142):259. doi: 10.1038/447259c.
8
Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples?评论：不当激励还是害群之马？
Account Res. 2015;22(3):148-61. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.950253.
9
Professional ethics group reviews guidelines for misconduct investigations.职业道德小组审查不当行为调查指南。
Science. 1984 Sep 7;225(4666):1012-3. doi: 10.1126/science.11644154.
10
Using Ethical Reasoning to Amplify the Reach and Resonance of Professional Codes of Conduct in Training Big Data Scientists.运用伦理推理来扩大专业行为准则在大数据科学家培训中的影响范围与共鸣效果。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1485-507. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9613-1. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
引用本文的文献
1
Large-scale genotype prediction from RNA sequence data necessitates a new ethical and policy framework.从RNA序列数据进行大规模基因型预测需要一个新的伦理和政策框架。
Nat Genet. 2024 Aug;56(8):1537-1540. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01825-4.
2
Moral caring competency and moral distress among Ghanaian nurses in adult care settings: A descriptive-correlational study.加纳成人护理环境中护士的道德关怀能力与道德困扰：一项描述性相关性研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Apr 28;10(2):134-142. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3168. eCollection 2024.
3
Developer Perspectives on Potential Harms of Machine Learning Predictive Analytics in Health Care: Qualitative Analysis.开发者视角下医疗机器学习预测分析的潜在危害：定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 16;25:e47609. doi: 10.2196/47609.
4
Ethical Guidance for Hard Decisions: A Critical Review of Early International COVID-19 ICU Triage Guidelines.伦理决策指南：对早期国际 COVID-19 重症监护室分诊指南的批判性评价。
Health Care Anal. 2022 Jun;30(2):163-195. doi: 10.1007/s10728-021-00442-0. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
5
Awareness of pharmacy researchers about the national research code of ethics: A study from Jordan.约旦药学研究人员对国家研究伦理准则的认知：一项研究
Heliyon. 2021 Jun 2;7(6):e07180. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07180. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Researchers views about perceived harms and benefits of gene editing: A study from the MENA region.研究人员对基因编辑的感知危害和益处的看法：一项来自中东和北非地区的研究。
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 23;7(4):e06860. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06860. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Does Proof of Concept Trump All? RRI Dilemmas in Research Practices.概念验证是否胜过一切？研究实践中的 RRI 困境。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 2;27(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00288-8.
8
Differences in Biases and Compensatory Strategies Across Discipline, Rank, and Gender Among University Academics.大学学者在学科、职级和性别方面的偏见及补偿策略差异
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1551-79. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9615-z. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
本文引用的文献
1
Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.科学出版：撤稿的麻烦。
Nature. 2011 Oct 5;478(7367):26-8. doi: 10.1038/478026a.
2
Credit and authorship practices: educational and environmental influences.信用和作者身份实践：教育和环境影响。
Account Res. 2010 Sep;17(5):223-56. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2010.512857.
3
The death of Jesse Gelsinger: new evidence of the influence of money and prestige in human research.杰西·盖辛格之死：金钱与声望对人体研究影响的新证据。
Am J Law Med. 2010;36(2-3):295-325. doi: 10.1177/009885881003600202.
4
Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.科学中的规范失调：美国科学家全国性调查结果
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):3-14. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3.
5
Do ethical guidelines give guidance? A critical examination of eight ethics regulations.道德准则能提供指导吗？对八项伦理规范的批判性审视。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2008 Winter;17(1):15-29. doi: 10.1017/S0963180108080031.
6
A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work.一种评估科研工作中道德行为的新方法。
Account Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;10(4):205-28. doi: 10.1080/714906104.
Zotero 插件